World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
50
Citations
6333
World Ranking
17794
National Ranking
7279

Barbara M. Sanborn publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara M. Sanborn sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 137 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Barbara M. Sanborn D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara M. Sanborn sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barbara M. Sanborn is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their academic career is associated with this institution, which serves as the primary platform for their research activities.

Data on research publications, co-authors, and collaborative works are not available, which limits detailed commentary on the development of their scientific network or contribution to specific published literature. Similarly, no information on frequent publication venues or book publications has been provided.

Details regarding their main fields of study, subfields, and main research topics are not listed, indicating either a broad scope of interests or a lack of documented specialization information from the available data.

There are no recorded awards linked to Barbara M. Sanborn, reflecting an absence of publicly documented recognitions or honors at this time.

This profile presents available information strictly based on currently accessible data, without extrapolation beyond the source provided.

Best Publications

  • International Union of Pharmacology LVII: Recommendations for the Nomenclature of Receptors for Relaxin Family Peptides

    Ross Bathgate;Richard Ivell;Barbara M Sanborn;O David Sherwood

  • Isolation and culture of FSH responsive Sertoli cells.

    A. Steinberger;J. J. Heindel;J. N. Lindsey;J. S. H. Elkington

  • Calcium-activated K+ channels as modulators of human myometrial contractile activity.

    K. Anwer;C. Oberti;G. J. Perez;N. Perez-Reyes

  • Antibodies from preeclamptic patients stimulate increased intracellular Ca2+ mobilization through angiotensin receptor activation

    Theingi M. Thway;Sergiy G. Shlykov;Mary Clare Day;Barbara M. Sanborn

  • Prostaglandins Differentially Modulate Progesterone Receptor-A and -B Expression in Human Myometrial Cells: Evidence for Prostaglandin-Induced Functional Progesterone Withdrawal

    Gemma Madsen;Tamas Zakar;Chun Ying Ku;Barbara M. Sanborn

  • Direct measurement of androgen receptors in cultured sertoli cells

    Barbara M. Sanborn;Anna Steinberger;R.K. Tcholakian;Emil Steinberger

  • Phosphorylation and Regulation of G-protein-activated Phospholipase C-β3 by cGMP-dependent Protein Kinases

    Chunzhi Xia;Zhenmin Bao;Caiping Yue;Barbara M. Sanborn

  • Molecular Mechanism of the Inhibition of Phospholipase C β3 by Protein Kinase C

    Caiping Yue;Chun-Ying Ku;Mingyao Liu;Melvin I. Simon

  • Changes in intracellular free calcium in isolated myometrial cells: role of extracellular and intracellular calcium and possible involvement of guanine nucleotide-sensitive proteins.

    Khursheed Anwer;Barbara M. Sanborn

  • Relaxin stimulates myometrial calcium-activated potassium channel activity via protein kinase A.

    P. Meera;K. Anwer;M. Monga;C. Oberti

  • Increase in testicular androgen receptor during sexual maturation in the rat.

    S W Buzek;B M Sanborn

  • Molecular signaling through G-protein-coupled receptors and the control of intracellular calcium in myometrium.

    Barbara M. Sanborn;Chun-Ying Ku;Sergiy Shlykov;Lidiya Babich

  • Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Activation by Myometrial Oxytocin Receptor Involves GαqGβγ and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Activation

    Miao Zhong;Ming Yang;Barbara M. Sanborn

  • Antagonism of contractants and relaxants at the level of intracellular calcium and phosphoinositide turnover in the rat uterus.

    Khursheed Anwer;Johanne A. Hovington;B. M. Sanborn

  • Androgen binding sites in testis cell fractions as measured by a nuclear exchange assay

    Barbara M. Sanborn;Anna Steinberger;Marvin L. Meistrich;Emil Steinberger

  • Receptors for relaxin family peptides.

    Ross A Bathgate;Richard Ivell;Barbara M Omar Sanborn;O David Sherwood

  • Evidence for inhibition by protein kinase A of receptor/G alpha(q)/phospholipase C (PLC) coupling by a mechanism not involving PLCbeta2.

    Kimberly L. Dodge;Barbara M. Sanborn

  • Effect of hypotonic treatment on Sertoli cell purity and function in culture.

    J. R. Wagle;J. J. Heindel;A. Steinberger;B. M. Sanborn

  • The effect of testosterone propionate on the concentration of testicular and epididymal androgen binding activity in the hypophysectomised rat.

    J.S.H. Elkington;B.M. Sanborn;E. Steinberger

  • Specific estrogen binding proteins in human cervix.

    Barbara M. Sanborn;Berel Held;Hsu S. Kuo

Frequent Co-Authors

Ligia Toro
Ligia Toro University of California, Los Angeles
Robert C. Burghardt
Robert C. Burghardt Texas A&M University
Roger J. Summers
Roger J. Summers Monash University
Richard Ivell
Richard Ivell University of Nottingham
Ross A. D. Bathgate
Ross A. D. Bathgate Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Melvin I. Simon
Melvin I. Simon California Institute of Technology
Shutsung Liao
Shutsung Liao University of Chicago
Daniel W. Carr
Daniel W. Carr Oregon Health & Science University
George M. Weinstock
George M. Weinstock The Jackson Laboratory
Olivier Lichtarge
Olivier Lichtarge Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, you might also consider healthcare-focused online degrees that offer flexible pathways and high-demand careers. For example, many students are curious: is medical billing and coding worth it? This field suits those who want to work in healthcare administration without direct patient care and enjoy data-driven roles.

For broader health information roles, health information management online programs combine technology, compliance, and management. These programs often appeal to detail-oriented students looking for tech-driven healthcare careers.

If you’re passionate about nutrition and wellness, an online nutrition masters can open doors to roles in healthcare, research, and public health education, especially for those who want to promote healthy living on a population scale.

Finally, those interested in diagnostic imaging might explore accredited online ultrasound tech school options that blend practical skills with online study.

These online degree paths can complement or expand your opportunities beyond traditional biology and biochemistry routes, offering diverse career prospects across the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara M. Sanborn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles