World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rick A. Nishimura

Rick A. Nishimura

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 128 2665 2486 1487 1365 682 76627

Rick A. Nishimura publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rick A. Nishimura between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rick A. Nishimura published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 15.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2021. 14 of the 695 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2021. 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 16 publications 1991: 12 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 47 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 5 publications
1982 2025

695 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rick A. Nishimura: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 3
1983 3
1984 10
1985 9
1986 9
1987 8
1988 10
1989 10
1990 16
1991 12
1992 5
1993 6
1994 7
1995 13
1996 18
1997 16
1998 10
1999 9
2000 9
2001 9
2002 12
2003 9
2004 20
2005 9
2006 20
2007 14
2008 13
2009 23
2010 14
2011 23
2012 17
2013 27
2014 33
2015 29
2016 29
2017 34
2018 23
2019 32
2020 32
2021 47
2022 24
2023 5
2024 9
2025 5
Total 695
Download as CSV

Rick A. Nishimura publications per year - data summary

  • Rick A. Nishimura, a Medicine scholar from Mayo Clinic, has 695 publications recorded across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 47 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1982 and 1983, with 3 publications each.
  • The rate of publication averages 15.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 15.8 per year counting only the 44 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 90 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1996: 139 publications (9.3 per year); 1997-2011: 210 publications (14.0 per year); 2012-2025: 346 publications (24.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Rick A. Nishimura publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick A. Nishimura sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 682 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 682
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rick A. Nishimura publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Rick A. Nishimura, a Medicine scholar from Mayo Clinic, records 682 publications - the 79th percentile of the discipline.
  • 79% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Rick A. Nishimura, and about 21% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Rick A. Nishimura ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Rick A. Nishimura D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick A. Nishimura sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 128–129 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230 128
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Rick A. Nishimura D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Rick A. Nishimura, a Medicine scholar from Mayo Clinic, records 128 D-Index - the 87th percentile of the discipline.
  • 87% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Rick A. Nishimura, and about 13% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Rick A. Nishimura ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - Gifted Teacher Award, American College of Cardiology (ACC)

Overview

Rick A. Nishimura is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research emphases are centered on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, with notable contributions also spanning Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's work covers several specialized topics including:

  • Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Rick A. Nishimura has published extensively in key journals, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

Among recent papers, notable publications include:

  • Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Detection of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Using a Convolutional Neural Network-Enabled Electrocardiogram, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Left Atrial Myopathy in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction, 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamics in Pulmonary Hypertension and Heart Failure, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Hartzell V. Schaff
  • Steve R. Ommen
  • Joseph A. Dearani
  • Jeffrey B. Geske
  • Mackram F. Eleid

Rick A. Nishimura's contributions have been recognized with awards such as the Gifted Teacher Award from the American College of Cardiology in 2006.

Best Publications

  • 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease

    Rick A. Nishimura;Catherine M. Otto;Robert O. Bonow;Blase A. Carabello

  • Clinical Utility of Doppler Echocardiography and Tissue Doppler Imaging in the Estimation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures A Comparative Simultaneous Doppler-Catheterization Study

    Steve R. Ommen;R. A. Nishimura;C. P. Appleton;F. A. Miller

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

    Bernard J. Gersh;Barry J. Maron;Robert O. Bonow;Joseph A. Dearani;Joseph A. Dearani

  • Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Mild Coronary Artery Disease and Endothelial Dysfunction

    Jassim Al Suwaidi;Shuichi Hamasaki;Stuart T. Higano;Rick A. Nishimura

  • ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease)

    Robert O. Bonow;Blase A. Carabello;Kanu Chatterjee;Antonio C. de Leon

  • Evaluation of Diastolic Filling of Left Ventricle in Health and Disease: Doppler Echocardiography Is the Clinician’s Rosetta Stone

    Rick A Nishimura;A.Jamil Tajik

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

    Bernard J. Gersh;Barry J. Maron;Robert O. Bonow;Joseph A. Dearani

  • ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (Lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): Executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vas

    A. T. Hirsch;Z. J. Haskal;N. R. Hertzer;C. W. Bakal

  • Continuous wave doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: A simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients

    Philip J. Currie;James B. Seward;Kwan-Leung Chan;Derek A. Fyfe

  • Noninvasive Doppler-derived myocardial performance index: Correlation with simultaneous measurements of cardiac catheterization measurements

    Chuwa Tei;Rick A. Nishimura;James B. Seward;A.Jamil Tajik

  • Exercise Hemodynamics Enhance Diagnosis of Early Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

    Barry A. Borlaug;Rick A. Nishimura;Paul Sorajja;Carolyn S.P. Lam

  • Outcome of 622 Adults With Asymptomatic, Hemodynamically Significant Aortic Stenosis During Prolonged Follow-Up

    Patricia A. Pellikka;Maurice E. Sarano;Rick A. Nishimura;Joseph F. Malouf

  • The noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography

    Jae K. Oh;Christopher P. Appleton;Liv K. Hatle;Rick A. Nishimura

  • Assessment of diastolic function of the heart: background and current applications of Doppler echocardiography. Part II. Clinical studies.

    Rick A. Nishimura;Martin D. Abel;Liv K. Hatle;A. Jamil Tajik

  • Intravascular ultrasound imaging : in vitro validation and pathologic correlation

    Rick A. Nishimura;William D. Edwards;Carole A. Warnes;Guy S. Reeder

  • Long-term effects of surgical septal myectomy on survival in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    Steve R. Ommen;Barry J. Maron;Iacopo Olivotto;Martin S. Maron

  • Superiority of brain natriuretic peptide as a hormonal marker of ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction and ventricular hypertrophy.

    Kazuhiro Yamamoto;John C. Burnett;Michihisa Jougasaki;Rick A. Nishimura

  • Echocardiographically documented mitral-valve prolapse. Long-term follow-up of 237 patients.

    Rick A. Nishimura;Michael D. McGoon;Clarence Shub;Fletcher A. Miller

  • Relation of pulmonary vein to mitral flow velocities by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Effect of different loading conditions.

    R A Nishimura;M D Abel;L K Hatle;A J Tajik

  • 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Bernard J. Gersh;Barry J. Maron;Robert O. Bonow;Joseph A. Dearani

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve R. Ommen
Steve R. Ommen Mayo Clinic
David R. Holmes
David R. Holmes Mayo Clinic
A. Jamil Tajik
A. Jamil Tajik Mayo Clinic
Bernard J. Gersh
Bernard J. Gersh Mayo Clinic
Jonathan L. Halperin
Jonathan L. Halperin Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Alice K. Jacobs
Alice K. Jacobs Boston University
Sidney C. Smith
Sidney C. Smith University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Barbara Riegel
Barbara Riegel University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine goes beyond the traditional MD path. There are several in-demand online programs that open doors to growing healthcare fields. For example, nurse practitioners play a vital mental health role. If you want a fast-track option, consider enrolling in the fastest psych np program to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

If you are interested in the business side of healthcare, you’ll find many health administration degree programs available online. These programs are ideal for future hospital managers, clinical directors, or medical office leaders. Looking to save on tuition? Review these cheap mha programs to find affordable options that fit your budget.

Finally, advancing to clinical or executive leadership roles is easier than ever with flexible online options. Check out the best online dnp programs if you aim to earn a terminal nursing degree while balancing work and study.

Each of these pathways offers a unique way to make a difference in healthcare—without leaving your current job, your home, or your community.

Best Scientists Citing Rick A. Nishimura

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles