World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4482 4148 483 456 175 26199

Ian S. Penton-Voak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian S. Penton-Voak between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian S. Penton-Voak published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2017. 25 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2017. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 6 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications
1995 2025

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian S. Penton-Voak: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 6
2000 2
2001 4
2002 4
2003 2
2004 3
2005 4
2006 6
2007 6
2008 8
2009 8
2010 6
2011 6
2012 6
2013 10
2014 4
2015 11
2016 5
2017 14
2018 11
2019 10
2020 13
2021 13
2022 12
2023 14
2024 14
2025 11
Total 216
Download as CSV

Ian S. Penton-Voak publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian S. Penton-Voak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 175
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ian S. Penton-Voak D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian S. Penton-Voak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ian S. Penton-Voak is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their academic focus lies predominantly within the field of Psychology, with extensive work in Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's research covers a variety of topics, including:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Ian S. Penton-Voak has contributed to several publications in a range of journals. Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by them include:

  • "A Randomized Controlled Trial of Computerized Interpretation Bias Training for Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder: A Fast-Fail Study" (2021), published in Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "The effects of age at menarche and first sexual intercourse on reproductive and behavioural outcomes: A Mendelian randomization study" (2020), published in PLoS ONE
  • "The role of state and trait anxiety in the processing of facial expressions of emotion" (2022), published in Royal Society Open Science
  • "Emotional recognition training modifies neural response to emotional faces but does not improve mood in healthy volunteers with high levels of depressive symptoms" (2020), published in Psychological Medicine
  • "Cohort profile for the STratifying Resilience and Depression Longitudinally (STRADL) study: A depression-focused investigation of Generation Scotland, using detailed clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging assessments" (2021), published in Wellcome Open Research

The primary venues where Ian S. Penton-Voak's work appears include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • PLoS ONE

Frequent collaborators in their research encompass:

  • Marcus R. Munafò
  • Angela S. Attwood
  • Helen Bould
  • Steph Suddell
  • Zoe E. Reed

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness

    David I. Perrett;Kieran J Lee;Kieran J Lee;Ian S. Penton-Voak;Duncan Rowland

  • Menstrual cycle alters face preference

    I. S. Penton-Voak;D. I. Perrett;D. L. Castles;D. L. Castles;T. Kobayashi

  • Symmetry and human facial attractiveness.

    David I Perrett;D.Michael Burt;Ian S Penton-Voak;Kieran J Lee

  • Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence

    I.S Penton-Voak;D.I Perrett

  • Evolutionary Psychology of Facial Attractiveness

    Bernhard Fink;Ian Penton-Voak

  • Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape

    A. C. Little;Benedict Christopher Jones;I. S. Penton-Voak;D. M. Burt

  • Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces

    A. C. Little;D. M. Burt;I. S. Penton-Voak;D. I. Perrett

  • Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness.

    I. S. Penton-Voak;Benedict Christopher Jones;A. C. Little;S. Baker

  • High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans.

    Ian S Penton-Voak;Jennie Y Chen

  • Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship

    Benedict Christopher Jones;A. C. Little;I. S. Penton-Voak;B. P. Tiddeman

  • Oxytocin and social perception: oxytocin increases perceived facial trustworthiness and attractiveness.

    Angeliki Theodoridou;Angela C. Rowe;Ian S. Penton-Voak;Peter J. Rogers

  • Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a "kernel of truth" in social perception

    Ian S. Penton-Voak;Nicholas Pound;Anthony C. Little;David I. Perrett

  • Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder.

    Michael N Dalili;Ian S Penton-Voak;Catherine Harmer;Marcus R Munafo

  • Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity

    Lisa M DeBruine;Benedict C Jones;Anthony C Little;Lynda G Boothroyd

  • Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration

    I. S. Penton-Voak;Helen Edwards;Andrew Percival;J. H. Wearden

  • Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens).

    I. S. Penton-Voak;A. C. Little;Benedict C. Jones;D. M. Burt

  • The watching eyes effect in the Dictator Game: it's not how much you give, it's being seen to give something

    Daniel Nettle;Zoe Harper;Adam Kidson;Rosie Stone

  • Feeling the heat: body temperature and the rate of subjective time, revisited.

    J H Wearden;I S Penton-Voak

  • Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples

    Ian S Penton-Voak;A Jacobson;R Trivers

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
David I. Perrett
David I. Perrett University of St Andrews
Catherine J. Harmer
Catherine J. Harmer University of Oxford
Anthony C. Little
Anthony C. Little University of Bath
Benedict C. Jones
Benedict C. Jones University of Strathclyde
Matthew R. Broome
Matthew R. Broome University of Birmingham
Glyn Lewis
Glyn Lewis University College London
Christopher Jarrold
Christopher Jarrold University of Bristol
Andy T. Woods
Andy T. Woods University of Oxford
George Davey Smith
George Davey Smith University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology can open doors to a variety of related degrees and career paths, especially in Social Work. Many students choose to supplement or even transition their psychology studies with a specialized social work program. These programs often provide a strong foundation in community engagement, mental health services, and counseling—skills highly valued in today's job market.

There are numerous online and in-person Social Work degrees to consider across different locations. For example, if you’re based in the Southwest, check out popular social work degrees in Arizona. Students in the Midwest may find tailored options among the popular social work degrees in Duluth. Those considering the Southeast can explore the top-ranked social work degree programs in North Carolina, while the Northeast features top choices such as the best-ranked social work degree programs in Pittsburgh.

Whether you aim for a clinical role, community outreach, or policy advocacy, pairing Psychology with a Social Work degree can significantly expand your career options and help make a broader impact.

Best Scientists Citing Ian S. Penton-Voak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles