World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
14150
World Ranking
8375
National Ranking
840

Andy T. Woods publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andy T. Woods sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Andy T. Woods D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andy T. Woods sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Individual Differences in Reward Drive Predict Neural Responses to Images of Food

    John D. Beaver;Andrew David Lawrence;Jenneke van Ditzhuijzen;Matt H. Davis

  • Conducting perception research over the internet: a tutorial review.

    Andy T. Woods;Carlos Velasco;Carmel A. Levitan;Xiaoang Wan

  • On tasty colours and colourful tastes? Assessing, explaining, and utilizing crossmodal correspondences between colours and basic tastes

    Charles Spence;Xiaoang Wan;Andy Woods;Carlos Velasco

  • Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review

    Carlos Velasco;Andy T. Woods;Olivia Petit;Adrian D. Cheok

  • Effect of background noise on food perception

    Andrew T. Woods;E Poliakoff;Donna Lloyd;J Kuenzel

  • Hedonic mediation of the crossmodal correspondence between taste and shape

    Carlos Velasco;Andy T. Woods;Ophelia Deroy;Charles Spence

  • Cross-cultural differences in crossmodal correspondences between basic tastes and visual features.

    Xiaoang Wan;Andy T. Woods;Jasper J. F. van den Bosch;Kirsten J. McKenzie

  • ‘Show me the goods’: Assessing the effectiveness of transparent packaging vs. product imagery on product evaluation

    Gregory Simmonds;Andy T. Woods;Charles Spence

  • That sounds sweet: using cross-modal correspondences to communicate gustatory attributes

    Klemens M. Knoeferle;Andy Woods;Florian Käppler;Charles Spence

  • Visual, haptic and crossmodal recognition of scenes.

    Fiona N. Newell;Andrew T. Woods;Marion Mernagh;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • Do VR and AR versions of an immersive cultural experience engender different user experiences

    Isabelle Verhulst;Andy Woods;Laryssa Whittaker;James Bennett

  • The Taste of Typeface

    Carlos Velasco;Andy T. Woods;Sarah Hyndman;Charles Spence

  • Does Glass Size and Shape Influence Judgements of the Volume of Wine

    Rachel Katherine Pechey;Angela S Attwood;Dominique-Laurent Couturier;Marcus R Munafò

  • Impaired Recognition of Basic Emotions from Facial Expressions in Young People with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Assessing the Importance of Expression Intensity

    Sarah L Griffiths;Christopher R Jarrold;Ian S Penton-Voak;Andy Woods

  • Expected taste intensity affects response to sweet drinks in primary taste cortex.

    Andrew T. Woods;Donna M. Lloyd;Johanna Kuenzel;Ellen Poliakoff

  • The context of colour-flavour associations in crisps packaging: A cross-cultural study comparing Chinese, Colombian, and British consumers

    Carlos Velasco;Xiaoang Wan;Alejandro Salgado-Montejo;Alejandro Salgado-Montejo;Andy Woods

  • "What's Your Taste in Music?" A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Various Soundscapes in Evoking Specific Tastes.

    Qian Janice Wang;Andy T Woods;Charles Spence

  • Does the shape of a cup influence coffee taste expectations? A cross-cultural, online study

    George Van Doorn;Andy Woods;Carmel A. Levitan;Xiaoang Wan

  • Cross-cultural color-odor associations.

    Carmel A. Levitan;Jiana Ren;Andy T. Woods;Sanne Boesveldt

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Carlos Velasco
Carlos Velasco BI Norwegian Business School
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Ian S. Penton-Voak
Ian S. Penton-Voak University of Bristol
Fiona N. Newell
Fiona N. Newell Trinity College Dublin
Adrian David Cheok
Adrian David Cheok i-University Tokyo
Ophelia Deroy
Ophelia Deroy Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ellen Poliakoff
Ellen Poliakoff University of Manchester
Donna M. Lloyd
Donna M. Lloyd University of Leeds
Andrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot University of Rochester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Andy T. Woods

Recently Published Articles