World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 39 8323 7688 612 565 173 6263

Ellen Poliakoff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ellen Poliakoff between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ellen Poliakoff published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2021. 18 of the 204 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 11 publications
2000 2025

204 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ellen Poliakoff: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 11
2008 7
2009 5
2010 12
2011 9
2012 13
2013 6
2014 3
2015 5
2016 11
2017 12
2018 9
2019 13
2020 15
2021 17
2022 13
2023 13
2024 7
2025 11
Total 204
Download as CSV

Ellen Poliakoff publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen Poliakoff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 173
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Ellen Poliakoff D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen Poliakoff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Ellen Poliakoff is a researcher affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their academic work spans several intersecting fields, primarily Psychology, Medicine, and Neuroscience. Within these disciplines, their focus extends to subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Neurology.

The central themes of Poliakoff's research are diverse and cover a variety of topics related to brain function, motor control, and neurological conditions. Key areas include:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Their recent publications reflect this multidisciplinary approach. Notable papers include:

  • "Cognitive training interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease" (2020), published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • "Applying Machine Learning to Kinematic and Eye Movement Features of a Movement Imitation Task to Predict Autism Diagnosis" (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • ""No Way Out Except From External Intervention": First-Hand Accounts of Autistic Inertia" (2021), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "More Than Movement: Exploring Motor Simulation, Creativity, and Function in Co-developed Dance for Parkinson's" (2022), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Action Imagery and Observation in Neurorehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease (ACTION-PD): Development of a User-Informed Home Training Intervention to Improve Functional Hand Movements" (2021), published in Parkinson's Disease

Poliakoff's research has been published extensively in several prominent journals, showing frequent contributions to:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Experimental Brain Research
  • PLoS ONE
  • Music & Science

Collaboration plays a significant role in their scholarly activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Emma Gowen
  • Judith Bek
  • Trevor J. Crawford
  • Dawn Rose
  • Stefan Vogt

Best Publications

  • Effect of background noise on food perception

    Andrew T. Woods;E Poliakoff;Donna Lloyd;J Kuenzel

  • Brief body-scan meditation practice improves somatosensory perceptual decision making

    Laura Mirams;Ellen Poliakoff;Richard J. Brown;Donna M. Lloyd

  • Vision and touch in ageing: crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions.

    E. Poliakoff;S. Ashworth;C. Lowe;C. Spence

  • Cognitive training interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease

    Vasiliki Orgeta;Kathryn R McDonald;Ellen Poliakoff;John Vincent Hindle

  • Goal-Directed and Goal-Less Imitation in Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Kelly S. Wild;Ellen Poliakoff;Andrew Jerrison;Emma Gowen

  • Expected taste intensity affects response to sweet drinks in primary taste cortex.

    Andrew T. Woods;Donna M. Lloyd;Johanna Kuenzel;Ellen Poliakoff

  • The Effect of Multimodal Feedback Presented via a Touch Screen on the Performance of Older Adults

    Ju-Hwan Lee;Ellen Poliakoff;Charles Spence

  • Modulation of saccadic intrusions by exogenous and endogenous attention

    Emma Gowen;RV Abadi;E Poliakoff;Peter Hansen

  • Tactile spatial acuity varies with site and axis in the human upper limb.

    Frederick W.J. Cody;Rebecca A.D. Garside;Donna Lloyd;Ellen Poliakoff

  • Visuotactile temporal order judgments in ageing

    E. Poliakoff;D.I. Shore;C. Lowe;C. Spence

  • The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation

    Kelly S. Wild;Ellen Poliakoff;Andrew Jerrison;Emma Gowen

  • Orienting of attention and Parkinson's disease: tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition.

    Ellen Poliakoff;Donald J O'Boyle;A Peter Moore;Francis P McGlone

  • Pre-stimulus alpha oscillations over somatosensory cortex predict tactile misperceptions.

    Matt Craddock;Ellen Poliakoff;Wael El-deredy;Ekaterini Klepousniotou

  • Automaticity and attention in Huntington's disease: When two hands are not better than one

    Jennifer C. Thompson;Ellen Poliakoff;Andrea C. Sollom;Elizabeth Howard

  • Applying Machine Learning to Kinematic and Eye Movement Features of a Movement Imitation Task to Predict Autism Diagnosis.

    Andrius Vabalas;Emma Gowen;Ellen Poliakoff;Alexander J. Casson

  • Development of a paradigm for measuring somatic disturbance in clinical populations with medically unexplained symptoms

    Donna M. Lloyd;Liam Mason;Richard J. Brown;Ellen Poliakoff

  • Illusory touch and tactile perception in somatoform dissociators.

    Richard J. Brown;Natalie Brunt;Ellen Poliakoff;Donna M. Lloyd

  • Time perception and autistic spectrum condition: A systematic review

    Martin Casassus;Ellen Poliakoff;Emma Gowen;Daniel Poole

  • Response-specific effects of pain observation on motor behavior.

    India Morrison;Ellen Poliakoff;Lucy Gordon;Paul Downing

  • The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch

    Ellen Poliakoff;Eleanor Miles;Xinying Li;Isabelle Blanchette

  • Somatoform dissociation and somatosensory amplification are differentially associated with attention to the tactile modality following exposure to body-related stimuli

    Richard J. Brown;Ellen Poliakoff;Matthew A. Kirkman

  • A third-person perspective on co-speech action gestures in Parkinson's disease

    Stacey Humphries;Judith Holler;Trevor Jeremy Crawford;Elena Herrera

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard J. Brown
Richard J. Brown University of Manchester
Donna M. Lloyd
Donna M. Lloyd University of Leeds
Trevor J. Crawford
Trevor J. Crawford Lancaster University
Judith Holler
Judith Holler Max Planck Society
Wael El-Deredy
Wael El-Deredy Valparaiso University
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford
Paul S. Holmes
Paul S. Holmes Manchester Metropolitan University
Steven P. Tipper
Steven P. Tipper University of York
Francis McGlone
Francis McGlone Liverpool John Moores University
Andy T. Woods
Andy T. Woods University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing neuroscience can open a wide range of professional opportunities in the fields of healthcare, mental health, social work, and research. For students seeking flexibility, online degrees have become increasingly popular—and affordable.

If you're interested in counseling or supporting mental health, a cheap online msw program can be a practical choice. Many programs now also offer faster completion times; for those ready to accelerate their careers, consider an accelerated msw option.

Another popular route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. There’s a growing demand for this credential in therapy and special education, and many institutions now feature online bcba programs.

If your interests are broader within the realm of the brain and behavior, an online psychology degree provides solid preparation for both research and clinical careers. These online pathways offer flexible, cost-effective ways to launch or advance your career related to neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Ellen Poliakoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles