World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
4602
World Ranking
9213
National Ranking
3890

Jorge Otero-Millan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge Otero-Millan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 104 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jorge Otero-Millan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge Otero-Millan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jorge Otero-Millan is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions in neurology, cognitive neuroscience, ophthalmology, human-computer interaction, and forensic medicine.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a focus on eye tracking, vestibular disorders, and neurological assessment methods. Notable papers include:

  • "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline" (2022), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "Minimal reporting guideline for research involving eye tracking (2023 edition)" (2023), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • "Proof of Concept for an 'eyePhone' App to Measure Video Head Impulses" (2020), published in Digital Biomarkers
  • "Opinion and Special Articles: Remote Evaluation of Acute Vertigo" (2020), published in Neurology
  • "aEYE: A deep learning system for video nystagmus detection" (2022), published in Frontiers in Neurology

The range of publication venues where Jorge Otero-Millan's work appears highlights a multidisciplinary approach. Frequent venues include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Digital Biomarkers
  • Frontiers in Neurology

Cooperative work is a significant aspect of their research output, collaborating regularly with a group of co-authors. Frequent collaborators are:

  • David E. Newman-Toker
  • David S. Zee
  • Amir Kheradmand
  • Ali S. Saber Tehrani
  • Nathan Farrell

Jorge Otero-Millan's research covers multiple main topics of interest. These include:

  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Gaze tracking and assistive technology
  • Ophthalmology and eye disorders
  • Hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics
  • Ophthalmology and visual impairment studies

The scope of their research demonstrates integration across clinical and experimental approaches, focusing on conditions affecting balance and vision, as well as technological advances in eye-tracking methods and diagnostics.

Best Publications

  • The impact of microsaccades on vision: towards a unified theory of saccadic function

    Susana Martinez-Conde;Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;Stephen L. Macknik

  • Saccades and microsaccades during visual fixation, exploration, and search: foundations for a common saccadic generator.

    Jorge Otero-Millan;Xoana G Troncoso;Stephen L Macknik;Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza

  • Task difficulty in mental arithmetic affects microsaccadic rates and magnitudes

    Eva Siegenthaler;Francisco M. Costela;Francisco M. Costela;Michael B. McCamy;Leandro L. Di Stasi;Leandro L. Di Stasi

  • Microsaccadic efficacy and contribution to foveal and peripheral vision

    Michael McCamy;Jorge Otero-Millan;Stephen Macknik;Yan Yang

  • The disturbance of gaze in progressive supranuclear palsy: implications for pathogenesis

    Athena L. Chen;David E. Riley;Susan A. King;Anand C. Joshi

  • Distinctive Features of Saccadic Intrusions and Microsaccades in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

    Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;Alessandro Serra;Alessandro Serra;R. John Leigh;Xoana G. Troncoso;Xoana G. Troncoso

  • An oculomotor continuum from exploration to fixation

    Jorge Otero-Millan;Stephen L. Macknik;Rachel E. Langston;Susana Martinez-Conde

  • Triggering mechanisms in microsaccade and saccade generation: a novel proposal.

    Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;Stephen L. Macknik;Alessandro Serra;R. John Leigh

  • Unsupervised clustering method to detect microsaccades.

    Jorge Otero-Millan;Jose L. Alba Castro;Stephen L. Macknik;Susana Martinez-Conde

  • Microsaccades drive illusory motion in the Enigma illusion.

    Xoana G. Troncoso;Stephen L. Macknik;Jorge Otero-Millan;Susana Martinez-Conde

  • Highly informative natural scene regions increase microsaccade production during visual scanning.

    Michael B McCamy;Jorge Otero-Millan;Leandro Luigi Di Stasi;Stephen L Macknik

  • Microsaccades and blinks trigger illusory rotation in the Rotating Snakes illusion

    Jorge Otero-Millan;Stephen L. Macknik;Susana Martinez-Conde

  • Fixational eye movements and binocular vision.

    Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;Stephen L. Macknik;Susana Martinez-Conde

  • Saccades during attempted fixation in parkinsonian disorders and recessive ataxia: from microsaccades to square-wave jerks.

    Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;Rosalyn Schneider;R. John Leigh;Stephen L. Macknik

  • Abnormal Fixational Eye Movements in Amblyopia.

    Aasef G. Shaikh;Jorge Otero-Millan;Priyanka Kumar;Fatema F. Ghasia;Fatema F. Ghasia

  • The effects of fixation target size and luminance on microsaccades and square-wave jerks

    Michael B. McCamy;Ali Najafian Jazi;Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;Stephen L. Macknik

  • Distinctive features of microsaccades in Alzheimer’s disease and in mild cognitive impairment

    Zoi Kapoula;Qing Yang;Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;Shifu Xiao

  • Knowing what the brain is seeing in three dimensions: A novel, noninvasive, sensitive, accurate, and low-noise technique for measuring ocular torsion

    Jorge Otero-Millan;Dale C. Roberts;Adrian Lasker;David S. Zee

  • Simultaneous recordings of human microsaccades and drifts with a contemporary video eye tracker and the search coil technique.

    Michael B. McCamy;Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;R. John Leigh;Susan A. King

  • Social misdirection fails to enhance a magic illusion

    Jie Cui;Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan;Stephen L. Macknik;Mac King

  • Microsaccades restore the visibility of minute foveal targets.

    Francisco M. Costela;Francisco M. Costela;Michael B. McCamy;Stephen L. Macknik;Jorge Otero-Millan;Jorge Otero-Millan

Frequent Co-Authors

Susana Martinez-Conde
Susana Martinez-Conde SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Stephen L. Macknik
Stephen L. Macknik SUNY Downstate Medical Center
David S. Zee
David S. Zee Johns Hopkins University
Michael C. Schubert
Michael C. Schubert Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Jong M. Rho
Jong M. Rho University of California, San Diego
Zoï Kapoula
Zoï Kapoula Howard Brain Sciences Foundation
David M. Treiman
David M. Treiman Barrow Neurological Institute
G. Michael Halmagyi
G. Michael Halmagyi Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Collin Broholm
Collin Broholm Johns Hopkins University
Peter U. Tse
Peter U. Tse Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways. For those interested in mental health services, earning a 1 year msw programs equips graduates with advanced social work skills and can lead to roles in healthcare, research, or clinical practice.

If you're considering the field of psychology, enrolling in an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology offers a fast track to foundational knowledge in behavioral and cognitive sciences.

Those drawn to counseling careers should seek programs that meet industry standards. Look for cacrep accredited counseling programs to ensure your education is recognized by employers and licensing boards. Additionally, finding an online counseling degree accredited by reputable organizations can prepare you for professional certification and practice.

Each of these pathways supports diverse career options in healthcare, research, therapy, and beyond, while offering the flexibility and accessibility of online education.

Best Scientists Citing Jorge Otero-Millan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles