World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
6040
World Ranking
13896
National Ranking
672

Gert Smolka publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gert Smolka sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 135 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Gert Smolka D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gert Smolka sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gert Smolka is affiliated with Saarland University in Germany and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The main topics of their work focus on areas such as:

  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Gert Smolka has contributed to academic literature with papers published in well-known venues within the computer science community. Recent publications include:

  • "A history of the Oz multiparadigm language" (2020), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "A Mechanised Proof of the Time Invariance Thesis for the Weak Call-By-Value λ-Calculus" (2021), published by Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Gert Smolka include:

  • Yannick Forster
  • Fabian Kunze
  • Maximilian Wuttke
  • Peter Van Roy
  • Seif Haridi

Publication venues where their work has commonly appeared are:

  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

Their body of work is firmly rooted in theoretical and applied aspects of computer science, particularly addressing verification methods and formal logic systems. This places Gert Smolka in a research context that combines rigorous mathematical frameworks with practical programming paradigms.

Best Publications

  • Attributive concept descriptions with complements

    Manfred Schmidt-Schaubß;Gert Smolka

  • The Oz Programming Model

    G. Smolka

  • Feature-constraint logics for unification grammars

    Gert Smolka

  • A Feature Logic with Subsorts

    Gert Smolka

  • Records for logic programming

    Gert Smolka;Ralf Treinen

  • The Oz Programming Model

    Gert Smolka

  • Order-Sorted Equational Computation

    Gert Smolka;Werner Nutt;Joseph A. Goguen;José Meseguer

  • Mobile objects in distributed Oz

    Peter Van Roy;Seif Haridi;Per Brand;Gert Smolka

  • A feature constraint system for logic programming with entailment

    Hassan Aït-Kaci;Andreas Podelski;Gert Smolka

  • Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming-CP97

    Gert Smolka

  • A concurrent lambda calculus with futures

    J. Niehren;J. Schwinghammer;G. Smolka

  • Object-Oriented Concurrent Constraint Programming in Oz

    Gert Smolka;Martin Henz;Jörg Würtz

  • Basic narrowing revisited

    Werner Nutt;Pierre Réty;Gert Smolka

  • Representation and reasoning with attributive descriptions

    B. Nebel;G. Smolka

  • Inheritance hierarchies: Semantics and unification

    Gert Smolka;Hassan Ait-Kaci

  • Oz—A Programming Language for Multi-Agent Systems

    Martin Henz;Gert Smolka;Jorg Wurtz

  • Oz: a programming language for multi-agent systems

    Martin Henz;Gert Smolka;Jorg Wurtz

  • Order-sorted unification

    Jose Meseguer;Joseph A. Goguen;Gert Smolka

  • The Definition of Kernel Oz

    Gert Smolka

  • Autosubst: Reasoning with de Bruijn Terms and Parallel Substitutions

    Steven Schäfer;Tobias Tebbi;Gert Smolka

  • Encapsulated Search and Constraint Programming in Oz

    Christian Schulte;Gert Smolka;Jörg Würtz

  • Efficient logic variables for distributed computing

    Seif Haridi;Peter Van Roy;Per Brand;Michael Mehl

  • Encapsulated search for higher-order concurrent constraint programming

    Christian Schulte;Gert Smolka

  • A Feature-Based Constraint System for Logic Programming with Entailment.

    Hassan Aït-Kaci;Andreas Podelski;Gert Smolka

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernhard Nebel
Bernhard Nebel University of Freiburg
Seif Haridi
Seif Haridi Royal Institute of Technology
Werner Nutt
Werner Nutt Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Andreas Podelski
Andreas Podelski University of Freiburg
Rolf Backofen
Rolf Backofen University of Freiburg
Franz Baader
Franz Baader TU Dresden
Joseph A. Goguen
Joseph A. Goguen University of California, San Diego
José Meseguer
José Meseguer University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Moritz Hardt
Moritz Hardt Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of educational and career options, especially with the rise of flexible online degrees. Students concerned about academic history often ask, "will grad schools accept low gpa?" Thankfully, many accredited online programs offer accessible pathways, even for those with less-than-perfect GPAs.

For those eager to accelerate their careers, consider pursuing the fastest computer science degree programs. These allow students to complete high-quality coursework in a shorter time frame, providing a faster route into the tech industry.

Career opportunities go beyond software or IT. With a computer science background, you might ask, "what can you get with an environmental science degree?" There is increasing demand for professionals who combine tech and environmental expertise, opening paths in data analysis, sustainability, and more.

If you’re passionate about environmental innovation, explore a practical environmental engineer degree online. This is a dynamic field at the intersection of technology and sustainability, offering meaningful work with global impact.

Best Scientists Citing Gert Smolka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles