World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Francesco M. Donini

Francesco M. Donini

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7894
World Ranking
9209
National Ranking
259

Francesco M. Donini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco M. Donini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 197 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Francesco M. Donini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco M. Donini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Francesco M. Donini is affiliated with Tuscia University in Italy and specializes in Computer Science with a focus on Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. Their research encompasses multiple subfields, including Molecular Biology, Information Systems and Management, and Management Information Systems. The scientist's work predominantly addresses topics such as Semantic Web and Ontologies, Recommender Systems and Techniques, Topic Modeling, and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies. Additional areas of expertise include Advanced Graph Neural Networks, Scientific Computing and Data Management, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).

Their recent publications include:

  • "A Formal Approach to Ontology-Based Semantic Match of Skills Descriptions" (2020, TUGraz OPEN Library - Graz University of Technology)
  • "Semantic-based Approach to Task Assignment of Individual Profiles" (2020, TUGraz OPEN Library - Graz University of Technology)
  • "Semantic-based Skill Management for Automated Task Assignment and Courseware Composition" (2020, TUGraz OPEN Library - Graz University of Technology)
  • "A qualitative analysis of knowledge graphs in recommendation scenarios through semantics-aware autoencoders" (2024, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems)
  • "Conversational recommendation: Theoretical model and complexity analysis" (2022, Information Sciences)

Frequent coauthors with whom Francesco M. Donini has collaborated include:

  • Eugenio Di Sciascio
  • Simona Colucci
  • Tommaso Di Noia
  • Claudio Pomo
  • Azzurra Ragone

The main venues where this scientist's research has been published are:

  • TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
  • Information Sciences
  • ACM SIGIR Forum

Best Publications

  • Reasoning in description logics

    Francesco M. Donini;Maurizio lenzerini;Daniele Nardi;Andrea Schaerf

  • The complexity of concept languages

    Werner Nutt;Francesco M. Donini;Maurizio Lenzerini;Daniele Nardi

  • {\cal A}{\cal L} -log: Integrating Datalog and Description Logics

    Francesco M. Donini;Maurizio Lenzerini;Daniele Nardi;Andrea Schaerf

  • A System for Principled Matchmaking in an Electronic Marketplace

    Tommaso Di Noia;Eugenio Di Sciascio;Francesco M. Donini;Marina Mongiello

  • Decidable reasoning in terminological knowledge representation systems

    Martin Buchheit;Francesco M. Donini;Andrea Schaerf

  • Description logics of minimal knowledge and negation as failure

    Francesco M. Donini;Daniele Nardi;Riccardo Rosati

  • A survey on knowledge compilation

    Marco Cadoli;Francesco M. Donini

  • The Complexity of Concept Languages.

    Francesco M. Donini;Maurizio Lenzerini;Daniele Nardi;Werner Nutt

  • An epistemic operator for description logics

    F. M. Donini;M. Lenzerini;D. Nardi;W. Nutt

  • EXP TIME tableaux for ALC

    Francesco M. Donini;Fabio Massacci

  • Tractable concept languages

    Francesco M. Donini;Maurizio Lenzerini;Daniele Nardi;Werner Nutt

  • Concept abduction and contraction for semantic-based discovery of matches and negotiation spaces in an e-marketplace

    Simona Colucci;Tommaso Di Noia;Eugenio Di Sciascio;Francesco M. Donini

  • Deduction in Concept Languages: from Subsumption to Instance Checking

    Francesco M. Donini;Maurizio Lenzerini;Daniele Nardi;Andrea Schaerf

  • The complexity of existential quantification in concept languages

    Francesco M. Donini;Maurizio Lenzerini;Daniele Nardi;Bernhard Hollunder

  • Elliot: A Comprehensive and Rigorous Framework for Reproducible Recommender Systems Evaluation

    Vito Walter Anelli;Alejandro Bellogin;Antonio Ferrara;Daniele Malitesta

  • Semantic matchmaking as non-monotonic reasoning: a description logic approach

    Tommaso Di Noia;Eugenio Di Sciascio;Francesco M. Donini

  • Adding Epistemic Operators to Concept Languages.

    Francesco M. Donini;Maurizio Lenzerini;Daniele Nardi;Andrea Schaerf

  • A Formal Approach to Ontology-Based Semantic Match of Skills Descriptions.

    Simona Colucci;Tommaso Di Noia;Eugenio Di Sciascio;Francesco M. Donini

  • Complexity of reasoning

    Francesco M. Donini

  • Abductive matchmaking using description logics

    Tommaso Di Noia;Eugenio Di Sciascio;Francesco M. Donini;Marina Mongiello

  • Exptime Tableaux for ALC.

    Giuseppe De Giacomo;Francesco M. Donini;Fabio Massacci

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugenio Di Sciascio
Eugenio Di Sciascio Polytechnic University of Bari
Tommaso Di Noia
Tommaso Di Noia Polytechnic University of Bari
Daniele Nardi
Daniele Nardi Sapienza University of Rome
Maurizio Lenzerini
Maurizio Lenzerini Sapienza University of Rome
Andrea Schaerf
Andrea Schaerf University of Udine
Werner Nutt
Werner Nutt Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Fabio Massacci
Fabio Massacci Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Riccardo Rosati
Riccardo Rosati Sapienza University of Rome
Umberto Straccia
Umberto Straccia National Research Council (CNR)
Diego Calvanese
Diego Calvanese Free University of Bozen-Bolzano

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in computer science opens various doors beyond traditional on-campus degrees. Many students start with flexible online options, such as 1 year associate degree programs online. These are beneficial for those seeking quick entry into the tech industry or wishing to build foundational knowledge before pursuing a bachelor’s degree.

Cost is a significant concern for many learners. Some institutions offer cheap online degrees fast, allowing students to minimize debt while gaining valuable credentials at an accelerated pace. These programs often provide the same accreditation and job prospects as their on-campus counterparts.

Not all students have high GPAs, but opportunities still exist. There are reputable online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa, helping more students access quality education in computer science and related fields, regardless of their academic background.

Beyond computer science, degrees in related areas can open unique career pathways. For example, if you’re interested in technology’s impact on the planet, explore what paths exist and what can you do with an environmental science major. Combining computer science skills with another field can further broaden your job opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Francesco M. Donini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles