World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Giuseppe De Giacomo

Giuseppe De Giacomo

Award Badge
Computer Science
Italy
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
84
Citations
23320
World Ranking
867
National Ranking
7

Giuseppe De Giacomo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuseppe De Giacomo sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 372 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Giuseppe De Giacomo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giuseppe De Giacomo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2016 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to the field of knowledge representation and reasoning, and applications to data integration, ontologies, planning, and process synthesis and verification.
  • 2015 - ACM Fellow For contributions to description logics, data management, and verification of data-driven processes

Overview

Giuseppe De Giacomo is affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research contributions primarily focus on computer science, with an emphasis on artificial intelligence and computational theory.

Their work spans several subfields including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Software
  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems

Key topics covered in their research are:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis

Some of Giuseppe De Giacomo's recent papers include:

  • "Compositional Approach to Translate LTLf/LDLf into Deterministic Finite Automata," 2021, Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
  • "Digital twin composition in smart manufacturing via Markov decision processes," 2023, Computers in Industry
  • "Monitoring Constraints and Metaconstraints with Temporal Logics on Finite Traces," 2022, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Other significant papers associated with their frequent collaborators include:

  • "AI-augmented Business Process Management Systems: A Research Manifesto," 2023, ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
  • "LTLƒ Synthesis with Fairness and Stability Assumptions," 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

They have collaborated frequently with researchers such as Shufang Zhu, Marco Favorito, Fabio Patrizi, Moshe Y. Vardi, and Francesco Fuggitti.

Their publications frequently appear in venues including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
  • Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence

Giuseppe De Giacomo has received recognition as a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 2016 for contributions to knowledge representation, reasoning, data integration, ontologies, planning, and process synthesis and verification.

They were also named an ACM Fellow in 2015 for work in description logics, data management, and verification of data-driven processes.

Best Publications

  • Tractable Reasoning and Efficient Query Answering in Description Logics: The DL-Lite Family

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe Giacomo;Domenico Lembo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Linking data to ontologies

    Antonella Poggi;Domenico Lembo;Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo

  • ConGolog , a concurrent programming language based on the situation calculus

    Giuseppe de Giacomo;Yves Lespérance;Hector J. Levesque

  • Reasoning on UML class diagrams

    Daniela Berardi;Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo

  • Automatic Composition of E-services That Export Their Behavior

    Daniela Berardi;Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Data complexity of query answering in description logics

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Domenico Lembo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Linear temporal logic and linear dynamic logic on finite traces

    Giuseppe De Giacomo;Moshe Y. Vardi

  • DL-Lite: tractable description logics for ontologies

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Domenico Lemho;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • On the decidability of query containment under constraints

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Data complexity of query answering in description logics

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Domenico Lembo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Data integration under integrity constraints

    Andrea Calì;Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Automatic composition of transition-based semantic web services with messaging

    Daniela Berardi;Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Richard Hull

  • The MASTRO system for ontology-based data access

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Domenico Lembo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Description logic framework for information integration

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Maurizio Lenzerini;Daniele Nardi

  • A framework for ontology integration

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • TBox and ABox reasoning in expressive description logics

    Giuseppe De Giacomo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Logical foundations of peer-to-peer data integration

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Maurizio Lenzerini;Riccardo Rosati

  • AUTOMATIC SERVICE COMPOSITION BASED ON BEHAVIORAL DESCRIPTIONS

    Daniela Berardi;Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Ontologies and Databases: The DL-Lite Approach

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe Giacomo;Domenico Lembo;Maurizio Lenzerini

  • Rewriting of regular expressions and regular path queries

    Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Maurizio Lenzerini;Moshe Y. Vardi

  • The MASTRO system for ontology-based data

    Thomas Lukasiewicz;Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Domenico Lembo

Frequent Co-Authors

Diego Calvanese
Diego Calvanese Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Maurizio Lenzerini
Maurizio Lenzerini Sapienza University of Rome
Riccardo Rosati
Riccardo Rosati Sapienza University of Rome
Domenico Lembo
Domenico Lembo Sapienza University of Rome
Moshe Y. Vardi
Moshe Y. Vardi Rice University
Massimo Mecella
Massimo Mecella Sapienza University of Rome
Marco Montali
Marco Montali Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Hector J. Levesque
Hector J. Levesque University of Toronto
Luca Iocchi
Luca Iocchi Sapienza University of Rome
Daniele Nardi
Daniele Nardi Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees and career pathways can help students maximize both flexibility and marketability in the ever-evolving field of Computer Science. Whether you’re aiming for swift entry into the workforce or seeking advanced expertise, several options are available to match your goals and schedule.

For those seeking a quick start in tech, 1 year associate degree programs online offer foundational skills and fast-track job readiness without a long-term commitment. Alternatively, individuals looking to boost their qualifications in the shortest time may consider the quickest online masters degree programs. These accelerated tracks enable graduates to increase earning potential and assume specialized roles sooner.

Pursuing graduate degrees that are worth it remains a strong option for those aiming at advanced career opportunities, leadership, or research positions. Additionally, gaining certifications that pay well can sharpen your skills in high-demand areas and significantly enhance your employability—even if you’re not ready for a full degree.

With these diverse online pathways, students can find the approach that best fits their ambitions and lifestyle, all while positioning themselves for rewarding careers in Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Giuseppe De Giacomo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles