World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
14184
World Ranking
4258
National Ranking
261

Michael Zakharyaschev publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Zakharyaschev sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 253 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Zakharyaschev D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Zakharyaschev sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Zakharyaschev is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on areas within Computer Science, with a particular emphasis on Artificial Intelligence. They have published extensively, contributing to subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Signal Processing, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their main research topics include Semantic Web and Ontologies, Advanced Database Systems and Queries, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, Data Management and Algorithms, semigroups and automata theory, DNA and Biological Computing, and Logic, programming, and type systems.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Michael Zakharyaschev cover several developments in ontology-mediated queries and linear temporal logic. These include:

  • First-order rewritability of ontology-mediated queries in linear temporal logic (2021), published in Artificial Intelligence
  • First-Order Rewritability and Complexity of Two-Dimensional Temporal Ontology-Mediated Queries (2022), published in Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • Deciding FO-Rewritability of Ontology-Mediated Queries in Linear Temporal Logic (2021), published by Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Deciding FO-rewritability of Regular Languages and Ontology-Mediated Queries in Linear Temporal Logic (2023), published in Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
  • A tetrachotomy of ontology-mediated queries with a covering axiom (2022), published in Artificial Intelligence

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Michael Zakharyaschev include Frank Wolter, Vladislav Ryzhikov, Agi Kurucz, Alessandro Artale, and Yury Savateev.

Most of their publications appear in leading venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Artificial Intelligence, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, European Urology, and venues from Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl).

Best Publications

  • Modal Logic

    Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Monodic fragments of first-order temporal logics: 2000-2001 A.D

    Ian M. Hodkinson;Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Semi-qualitative Reasoning about Distances: A Preliminary Report

    Holger Sturm;Nobu-Yuki Suzuki;Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Many-Dimensional Modal Logics: Theory and Applications

    Dov M Gabbay;Agi Kurucz;Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • The DL-lite family and relations

    Alessandro Artale;Diego Calvanese;Roman Kontchakov;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Ontology-based data access: a survey

    Guohui Xiao;Diego Calvanese;Roman Kontchakov;Domenico Lembo

  • ε-connections of abstract description systems

    Oliver Kutz;Carsten Lutz;Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Connecting abstract description systems

    Oliver Kutz;Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Temporal Description Logics: A Survey

    C. Lutz;F. Wolter;M. Zakharyashev

  • Decidable fragments of first-order temporal logics

    Ian M. Hodkinson;Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Multi-Dimensional Modal Logic as a Framework for Spatio-Temporal Reasoning

    Brandon Bennett;Anthony G. Cohn;Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Spatio-temporal representation and reasoning based on RCC-8

    Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Ontology-Based Data Access: Ontop of Databases

    Mariano Rodríguez-Muro;Roman Kontchakov;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • The combined approach to query answering in DL-Lite

    R. Kontchakov;C. Lutz;D. Toman;F. Wolter

  • Exploring Artificial Intelligence in the New Millenium

    F Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • The combined approach to ontology-based data access

    R. Kontchakov;C. Lutz;D. Toman;F. Wolter

  • Reasoning over Extended ER Models

    A. Artale;D. Calvanese;R. Kontchakov;V. Ryzhikov

  • Logic-based ontology comparison and module extraction, with an application to DL-Lite

    Roman Kontchakov;Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

  • Answering SPARQL Queries over Databases under OWL 2 QL Entailment Regime

    Roman Kontchakov;Martin Rezk;Mariano Rodríguez-Muro;Guohui Xiao

  • Temporalizing Description Logics.

    Frank Wolter;Michael Zakharyaschev

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Wolter
Frank Wolter University of Liverpool
Roman Kontchakov
Roman Kontchakov Birkbeck, University of London
Carsten Lutz
Carsten Lutz Leipzig University
Diego Calvanese
Diego Calvanese Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Dov M. Gabbay
Dov M. Gabbay University of Luxembourg
Enrico Franconi
Enrico Franconi Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Ulrike Sattler
Ulrike Sattler University of Manchester
Maarten de Rijke
Maarten de Rijke University of Amsterdam
Thomas Schwentick
Thomas Schwentick TU Dortmund University
Michael Fisher
Michael Fisher University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up diverse opportunities to specialize through online learning. Whether you’re interested in programming, security, design, or management, there are flexible options to match your goals.

Choosing online accredited colleges is essential for ensuring your degree is recognized by employers and can lead to wider career prospects. Accreditation guarantees a high-quality curriculum and can improve credit transferability if you continue your studies.

For those drawn to creative technology, video game design programs offer specialized courses in animation, game mechanics, and interactive storytelling. These programs can launch careers in game development, graphics, and virtual reality.

Security is another rapidly growing field. With the increasing demand for digital safety skills, enrolling in online cybersecurity master's programs prepares students for roles in threat analysis, network defense, and IT compliance.

Additionally, those interested in integrating tech with leadership can pursue an online construction management degree. This pathway blends project management, business, and technology, creating many opportunities in the booming construction technology sector.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Zakharyaschev

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles