World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas Schwentick

Thomas Schwentick

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
6734
World Ranking
7667
National Ranking
378

Thomas Schwentick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Schwentick sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 209 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thomas Schwentick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Schwentick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Thomas Schwentick is affiliated with TU Dortmund University in Germany. The primary area of their research lies within computer science, focusing on several subfields including artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, computer networks and communications, hardware and architecture, and signal processing.

The main research topics covered by Thomas Schwentick include:

  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Semigroups and Automata Theory
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Algorithms and Data Compression

Schwentick has contributed extensively to the academic literature with notable papers such as:

  • "Sketches of Dynamic Complexity," 2020, ACM SIGMOD Record
  • "Dynamic Complexity Meets Parameterised Algorithms," 2020, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • "Rewriting with Acyclic Queries: Mind Your Head," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Rewriting with Acyclic Queries: Mind Your Head," 2023, Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • "Distribution Constraints: The Chase for Distributed Data," 2020, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Frequent collaborators in their work include Nils Vortmeier, Thomas Zeume, Gaetano Geck, Jens Keppeler, and Christopher Spinrath. This collaborative network has contributed to ongoing research across various topics in theoretical computer science and database theory.

Thomas Schwentick's publications have appeared predominantly in:

  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGMOD Record
  • Logical Methods in Computer Science

In recognition of their contribution to science, Thomas Schwentick was elected as a member of the Academia Europaea in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Finite state machines for strings over infinite alphabets

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick;Victor Vianu

  • Two-variable logic on data trees and XML reasoning

    Mikoaj Bojańczyk;Anca Muscholl;Thomas Schwentick;Luc Segoufin

  • XPath Containment in the Presence of Disjunction, DTDs, and Variables

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick

  • Two-Variable Logic on Words with Data

    M. Bojanczyk;A. Muscholl;T. Schwentick;Luc Segoufin

  • When is the evaluation of conjunctive queries tractable

    Martin Grohe;Thomas Schwentick;Luc Segoufin

  • Expressiveness and complexity of XML Schema

    Wim Martens;Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick;Geert Jan Bex

  • Two-variable logic on data words

    Mikołaj Bojańczyk;Claire David;Anca Muscholl;Thomas Schwentick

  • Automata for XML---A survey

    Thomas Schwentick

  • Inference of concise DTDs from XML data

    Geert Jan Bex;Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick;Karl Tuyls

  • XPath query containment

    Thomas Schwentick

  • Query automata over finite trees

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick

  • On the complexity of equational horn clauses

    Kumar Neeraj Vermal;Helmut Seidl;Thomas Schwentick

  • Expressive and Efficient Pattern Languages for Tree-Structured Data.

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick

  • On the power of polynomial time bit-reductions

    U. Hertrampf;C. Lautemann;T. Schwentick;H. Vollmer

  • On the complexity of equational horn clauses

    Kumar Neeraj Verma;Helmut Seidl;Thomas Schwentick

  • On The Complexity Of Xpath Containment In The Presence Of Disjunction, Dtds, And Variables

    Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick

  • Inference of concise regular expressions and DTDs

    Geert Jan Bex;Frank Neven;Thomas Schwentick;Stijn Vansummeren

  • Generalized hypertree decompositions: NP-hardness and tractable variants

    Georg Gottlob;Zoltán Miklós;Thomas Schwentick

  • On notions of regularity for data languages

    Henrik Björklund;Thomas Schwentick

  • Counting in Trees for Free

    Helmut Seidl;Thomas Schwentick;Anca Muscholl;Peter Habermehl

  • Two-variable logic on data trees and XML reasoning

    Mikolaj Bojańczyk;Claire David;Anca Muscholl;Thomas Schwentick

  • Theory of computing systems

    W. Bartol;Z. Raś;A. Skowron

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Neven
Frank Neven Hasselt University
Luc Segoufin
Luc Segoufin French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Georg Gottlob
Georg Gottlob University of Calabria
Dan Suciu
Dan Suciu University of Washington
Victor Vianu
Victor Vianu University of California, San Diego
Helmut Seidl
Helmut Seidl Technical University of Munich
Leonid Libkin
Leonid Libkin University of Edinburgh
Marcelo Arenas
Marcelo Arenas Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Martin Grohe
Martin Grohe RWTH Aachen University
Serge Abiteboul
Serge Abiteboul École Normale Supérieure

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to various specialized online degrees that can diversify your career pathway. For students interested in protecting digital assets and understanding the evolving threat landscape, a cyber security degree offers in-depth knowledge of information systems security and risk management. These programs combine technical skills with practical strategies for real-world problems.

Computer Science foundations also pair well with fields outside pure technology. An online construction management degree cost is increasingly relevant, as building projects rely on digital planning and project tracking tools. Similarly, integrating tech with legal studies through a masters in criminology online can prepare you for roles in digital forensics or cybersecurity law.

Finally, students who value finance and analytics may benefit from online accounting classes that emphasize data systems, automation, and security—skills increasingly in demand across industries. These related online programs provide flexibility, lower costs, and interdisciplinary knowledge crucial for today’s competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Schwentick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles