World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Chile
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
11648
World Ranking
4108
National Ranking
2

Marcelo Arenas publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcelo Arenas sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 261 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marcelo Arenas D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcelo Arenas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Chile Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Chile Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Chile Leader Award

Overview

Marcelo Arenas is a researcher affiliated with the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile in Chile. Their work primarily focuses on various domains within computer science, with specific research interests that include artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, computational theory and mathematics, computer vision and pattern recognition, and signal processing.

Their research covers several main topics, including:

  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Graph Theory and Algorithms
  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Marcelo Arenas has published extensively in a variety of venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGMOD Record
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Data Intelligence

Among recent published papers, the following stand out:

  • "The Tractability of SHAP-Score-Based Explanations for Classification over Deterministic and Decomposable Boolean Circuits," 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "On the Complexity of SHAP-Score-Based Explanations: Tractability via Knowledge Compilation and Non-Approximability Results," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "On Computing Probabilistic Explanations for Decision Trees," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)

Other notable papers related to graph processing and the broader field of computing include:

  • "The future is big graphs," 2021, Communications of the ACM (authored by Sherif Sakr)
  • "The Future is Big Graphs! A Community View on Graph Processing Systems," 2020, Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (authored by Sherif Sakr)

Collaborations are an important component of Marcelo Arenas's scientific activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Pablo Barceló
  • Cristian Riveros
  • Mikaël Monet
  • Bernardo Subercaseaux
  • Renzo Angles

Best Publications

  • Semantics and complexity of SPARQL

    Jorge Pérez;Marcelo Arenas;Claudio Gutierrez

  • Consistent query answers in inconsistent databases

    M. Arenas;L. Bertossi;J. Chomicki

  • A normal form for XML documents

    Marcelo Arenas;Leonid Libkin

  • Foundations of Modern Query Languages for Graph Databases

    Renzo Angles;Marcelo Arenas;Pablo Barceló;Aidan Hogan

  • Mapping data in peer-to-peer systems: semantics and algorithmic issues

    Anastasios Kementsietsidis;Marcelo Arenas;Renée J. Miller

  • Semantics and complexity of SPARQL

    Jorge Pérez;Marcelo Arenas;Claudio Gutierrez

  • XML data exchange: Consistency and query answering

    Marcelo Arenas;Leonid Libkin

  • nSPARQL: A navigational language for RDF

    Jorge Pérez;Marcelo Arenas;Claudio Gutierrez

  • The hyperion project: from data integration to data coordination

    Marcelo Arenas;Vasiliki Kantere;Anastasios Kementsietsidis;Iluju Kiringa

  • Answer sets for consistent query answering in inconsistent databases

    Marcelo Arenas;Leopoldo Bertossi;Jan Chomicki

  • On directly mapping relational databases to RDF and OWL

    Juan F. Sequeda;Marcelo Arenas;Daniel P. Miranker

  • Querying semantic web data with SPARQL

    Marcelo Arenas;Jorge Pérez

  • An information-theoretic approach to normal forms for relational and XML data

    Marcelo Arenas;Leonid Libkin

  • Scalar aggregation in inconsistent databases

    Marcelo Arenas;Leopoldo Bertossi;Jan Chomicki;Xin He

  • XML data exchange: consistency and query answering

    Marcelo Arenas;Leonid Libkin

  • G-CORE: A Core for Future Graph Query Languages

    Renzo Angles;Marcelo Arenas;Pablo Barcelo;Peter Boncz

  • Counting beyond a Yottabyte, or how SPARQL 1.1 property paths will prevent adoption of the standard

    Marcelo Arenas;Sebastián Conca;Jorge Pérez

  • The future is big graphs: a community view on graph processing systems

    Sherif Sakr;Angela Bonifati;Hannes Voigt;Alexandru Iosup

  • A normal form for XML documents

    Marcelo Arenas;Leonid Libkin

  • Locally consistent transformations and query answering in data exchange

    Marcelo Arenas;Pablo Barceló;Ronald Fagin;Leonid Libkin

  • nSPARQL: A Navigational Language for RDF

    Jorge Pérez;Marcelo Arenas;Claudio Gutierrez

  • On Directly Mapping Relational Databases to RDF and OWL (Extended Version)

    Juan F. Sequeda;Marcelo Arenas;Daniel P. Miranker

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonid Libkin
Leonid Libkin University of Edinburgh
Leopoldo Bertossi
Leopoldo Bertossi Carleton University
Jan Chomicki
Jan Chomicki University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Diego Calvanese
Diego Calvanese Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Anastasios Kementsietsidis
Anastasios Kementsietsidis Google (United States)
Axel Polleres
Axel Polleres Vienna University of Economics and Business
Wenfei Fan
Wenfei Fan University of Edinburgh
Bernardo Cuenca Grau
Bernardo Cuenca Grau University of Oxford
Renée J. Miller
Renée J. Miller University of Toronto
Evgeny Kharlamov
Evgeny Kharlamov University of Oslo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science can lead to a wide range of online degree options and career pathways. Whether you’re just starting out or advancing your skills, there are flexible choices to fit your goals.

Many students opt for an associate degree online as an entry point into tech careers. Associate programs offer fundamental knowledge and can be a quick path into the workforce or a stepping stone to further study.

For those looking to maximize their investment, certain computer science graduate programs are ranked among the masters degrees that are worth it. These degrees are in high demand and often result in strong career prospects and salary growth.

Affordability is often a concern, but you can find the cheapest online colleges offering accredited computer science and IT programs. This allows students from all backgrounds to pursue their academic dreams without high financial barriers.

If your academic record isn’t perfect, there are still options. Several online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa make advanced study accessible, emphasizing potential and motivation as much as grades.

Best Scientists Citing Marcelo Arenas

Trending Scientists