World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernardo Cuenca Grau

Bernardo Cuenca Grau

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
14002
World Ranking
6689
National Ranking
399

Bernardo Cuenca Grau publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernardo Cuenca Grau sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 202 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bernardo Cuenca Grau D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernardo Cuenca Grau sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernardo Cuenca Grau is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research activity spans primarily across the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on Artificial Intelligence and related subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Information Systems.

The scientist's work concentrates on several key topics, notably:

  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Topic Modeling

They have published extensively, with frequent contributions to venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • Journal of Web Semantics

Recent papers by Bernardo Cuenca Grau include:

  • Benchmarking Ontology-Based Query Rewriting Systems, 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • MeTeoR: Practical Reasoning in Datalog with Metric Temporal Operators, 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Stratified Negation in Datalog with Metric Temporal Operators, 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Efficient Embeddings of Logical Variables for Query Answering over Incomplete Knowledge Graphs, 2023, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • The delay and window size problems in rule-based stream reasoning, 2022, Artificial Intelligence

The scientist collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Przemysław Andrzej Wałęga
  • Dingmin Wang
  • David J. Tena Cucala
  • Egor V. Kostylev
  • Ian Horrocks

Best Publications

  • Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner

    Evren Sirin;Bijan Parsia;Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Aditya Kalyanpur

  • OWL 2: The next step for OWL

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ian Horrocks;Boris Motik;Bijan Parsia

  • OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Profiles

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau

  • LogMap: logic-based and scalable ontology matching

    Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz;Bernardo Cuenca Grau

  • Modular reuse of ontologies: theory and practice

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ian Horrocks;Yevgeny Kazakov;Ulrike Sattler

  • Swoop: A Web Ontology Editing Browser

    Aditya Kalyanpur;Bijan Parsia;Evren Sirin;Bernardo Cuenca Grau

  • Just the right amount: extracting modules from ontologies

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ian Horrocks;Yevgeny Kazakov;Ulrike Sattler

  • Repairing unsatisfiable concepts in OWL ontologies

    Aditya Kalyanpur;Bijan Parsia;Evren Sirin;Bernardo Cuenca-Grau

  • A logical framework for modularity of ontologies

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ian Horrocks;Yevgeny Kazakov;Ulrike Sattler

  • Modularity and web ontologies

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Bijan Parsia;Evren Sirin;Aditya Kalyanpur

  • Working with multiple ontologies on the semantic web

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Bijan Parsia;Evren Sirin

  • Large-scale interactive ontology matching: algorithms and implementation

    Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz;Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Yujiao Zhou;Ian Horrocks

  • Combining OWL ontologies using E-Connections

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Bijan Parsia;Evren Sirin

  • Pellet: A Practical OWL-DL Reasoner

    Evren Sirin;Bijan Parsia;Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Aditya Kalyanpur

  • Safe and economic re-use of ontologies: a logic-based methodology and tool support

    Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz;Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ulrike Sattler;Thomas Schneider

  • Ontology Integration Using Mappings: Towards Getting the Right Logical Consequences

    Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz;Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ian Horrocks;Rafael Berlanga

  • Acyclicity notions for existential rules and their application to query answering in ontologies

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ian Horrocks;Markus Krötzsch;Clemens Kupke

  • Faceted search over RDF-based knowledge graphs

    Marcelo Arenas;Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Evgeny Kharlamov;Šarunas Marciuška

  • MORe: modular combination of OWL reasoners for ontology classification

    Ana Armas Romero;Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ian Horrocks

  • Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2013

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Zlatan Dragisic;Kai Eckert;Jérôme Euzenat

  • Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2014

    Zlatan Dragisic;Kai Eckert;Jérôme Euzenat;Daniel Faria

  • OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Direct Semantics

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Horrocks
Ian Horrocks University of Oxford
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz City, University of London
Boris Motik
Boris Motik University of Oxford
Bijan Parsia
Bijan Parsia University of Manchester
Evgeny Kharlamov
Evgeny Kharlamov University of Oslo
Ulrike Sattler
Ulrike Sattler University of Manchester
Evren Sirin
Evren Sirin University of Maryland, College Park
Aditya Kalyanpur
Aditya Kalyanpur Elemental Cognition
Marcelo Arenas
Marcelo Arenas Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Peter F. Patel-Schneider Palo Alto Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As computer science continues to evolve, related fields offer exciting degree and career opportunities—many of which can now be pursued online. For those interested in environmental impact and sustainability, an online environmental engineering degree provides strong foundations in problem-solving and emerging green technologies.

If you’re drawn to the application of physics and design in practical settings, a mechanical engineering degree online cost is becoming more affordable, opening doors to careers in robotics, automotive industries, and manufacturing.

A bachelor of science in physics online offers flexibility to build theoretical knowledge, develop strong analytical skills, and break into research-intensive positions or technology-focused roles.

Lastly, as demand for data-driven decision-making grows across sectors, earning a data science degree online can be a strategic step for launching a career in analytics, machine learning, or big data.

Best Scientists Citing Bernardo Cuenca Grau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles