World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Markus Krötzsch

Markus Krötzsch

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
11505
World Ranking
8196
National Ranking
401

Markus Krötzsch publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Krötzsch sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 171 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Markus Krötzsch D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Krötzsch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Krötzsch is a researcher affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany, with a primary focus on computer science. Their work encompasses a broad spectrum of subfields within this area, including artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, computational theory and mathematics, signal processing, and software.

The researcher's contributions are notably concentrated in several key topics that include semantic web and ontologies, logic, reasoning, and knowledge, advanced database systems and queries, formal methods in verification, data management and algorithms, logic, programming, and type systems, as well as AI-based problem solving and planning.

Markus Krötzsch has published in various venues with multiple papers, reflecting an engagement with prominent conferences and journals in their field. The recent papers include:

  • "Partially Ordered Automata and Piecewise Testability," 2021, published in Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • "Expressivity of Planning with Horn Description Logic Ontologies," 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Nemo: First Glimpse of a New Rule Engine," 2023, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science
  • "Reasoner = Logical Calculus + Rule Engine," 2020, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
  • "Simulating Sets in Answer Set Programming," 2022, Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Several frequent coauthors have collaborated with Markus Krötzsch, indicating ongoing research partnerships. These include Irina Dragoste, David Carral, Stephan Mennicke, Alex Ivliev, and Martin Bromberger. This network suggests interdisciplinary cooperation across various specialized topics and methodologies.

The researcher's publication record spans respected venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, and Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Markus Krötzsch's main area of study is computer science, supported by extensive work in artificial intelligence as its dominant subfield. Their research involves formal theoretical aspects as well as applied computational methods related to logic, semantic web technologies, database queries, and AI planning systems.

Best Publications

  • Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase

    Denny Vrandečić;Markus Krötzsch

  • Semantic Wikipedia

    Max Völkel;Markus Krötzsch;Denny Vrandecic;Heiko Haller

  • The two cultures: Mashing up Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web

    Anupriya Ankolekar;Markus Krötzsch;Thanh Tran;Denny Vrandečić

  • Semantic Wikipedia

    Markus Krötzsch;Denny Vrandečić;Max Völkel;Heiko Haller

  • Semantic mediawiki

    Markus Krötzsch;Denny Vrandečić;Max Völkel

  • Introducing Wikidata to the Linked Data Web

    Fredo Erxleben;Michael Günther;Markus Krötzsch;Julian Mendez

  • Semantic Web: Grundlagen

    Pascal Hitzler;Markus Krotzsch;Sebastian Rudolph;York Sure

  • OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer (Second Edition)

    Pascal Hitzler;Markus Krotzsch;Bijan Parsia;Peter F. Patel-Schneider

  • The Incredible ELK

    Yevgeny Kazakov;Markus Krötzsch;František Simančík

  • Getting the Most Out of Wikidata: Semantic Technology Usage in Wikipedia’s Knowledge Graph

    Stanislav Malyshev;Markus Krötzsch;Larry González;Julius Gonsior

  • Concurrent classification of EL ontologies

    Yevgeny Kazakov;Markus Krötzsch;František Simancík

  • A Description Logic Primer

    Markus Krötzsch

  • ELP: Tractable Rules for OWL 2

    Markus Krötzsch;Sebastian Rudolph;Pascal Hitzler

  • Description Logic Rules

    Markus Krötzsch;Sebastian Rudolph;Pascal Hitzler

  • Extending decidable existential rules by joining acyclicity and guardedness

    Markus Krötzsch;Sebastian Rudolph

  • Acyclicity notions for existential rules and their application to query answering in ontologies

    Bernardo Cuenca Grau;Ian Horrocks;Markus Krötzsch;Clemens Kupke

  • Formalizing Ontology Alignment and its Operations with Category Theory

    Antoine Zimmermann;Markus Krötzsch;Jérôme Euzenat;Pascal Hitzler

  • Reifying RDF: What Works Well With Wikidata?

    Daniel Hernández;Aidan Hogan;Markus Krötzsch

  • A better uncle for OWL: nominal schemas for integrating rules and ontologies

    Markus Krötzsch;Frederick Maier;Adila Krisnadhi;Pascal Hitzler

  • Description Logics

    Markus Krotzsch;Frantisek Simancik;Ian Horrocks

  • The Two Cultures Mashing up Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web - Position paper -

    Anupriya Ankolekar;Markus Krötzsch;Thanh Tran;Denny Vrandecic

Frequent Co-Authors

Pascal Hitzler
Pascal Hitzler Kansas State University
Ian Horrocks
Ian Horrocks University of Oxford
Rudi Studer
Rudi Studer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Boris Motik
Boris Motik University of Oxford
Philipp Cimiano
Philipp Cimiano Bielefeld University
Axel Polleres
Axel Polleres Vienna University of Economics and Business
York Sure
York Sure Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Bernardo Cuenca Grau
Bernardo Cuenca Grau University of Oxford
Michael Sintek
Michael Sintek German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary online degrees can open up new career opportunities for computer science students. For those interested in digital security, an accredited online cyber security degree provides advanced expertise to meet the growing demand for cybersecurity professionals.

If you are fascinated by large-scale projects and project management, pursuing a construction management degree online cost can lead to roles that blend technology and management in the construction industry.

A affordable online criminal justice degree is ideal for those drawn to law enforcement, forensics, or legal tech careers. It adds another dimension for students wishing to contribute to public safety using technology.

For students interested in finance and accounting, comparing online accounting degree cost can help you find budget-friendly options while preparing for roles in data analytics, financial technology, or accounting.

These online pathways offer flexibility and affordability, empowering computer science enthusiasts to tailor their education and pursue diverse tech-driven careers across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Krötzsch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles