World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Italy
2026
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 88 688 667 4 4 465 29322

Georg Gottlob publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Georg Gottlob between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Georg Gottlob published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2009. 8 of the 484 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2009. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 18 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 3 publications
1983 2025

484 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Georg Gottlob: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 3
1986 5
1987 3
1988 4
1989 5
1990 18
1991 4
1992 10
1993 11
1994 11
1995 12
1996 10
1997 17
1998 10
1999 10
2000 8
2001 15
2002 17
2003 13
2004 13
2005 16
2006 11
2007 15
2008 12
2009 29
2010 22
2011 24
2012 23
2013 17
2014 13
2015 11
2016 9
2017 7
2018 15
2019 11
2020 10
2021 9
2022 11
2023 10
2024 5
2025 3
Total 484
Download as CSV

Georg Gottlob publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georg Gottlob sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 462–471 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 465 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77 465
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Georg Gottlob D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Georg Gottlob sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75 88
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2010 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 2007 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the theory of artificial intelligence and database systems.
  • 2006 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Informatics
  • 2006 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Georg Gottlob is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research, and Signal Processing.

The main topics of Georg Gottlob's work include:

  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Data Quality and Management
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Data Management and Algorithms

Their recent papers reflect interests in database systems, reasoning, and knowledge graphs. Selected papers include:

  • "Vadalog: A modern architecture for automated reasoning with large knowledge graphs" (2020), published in Information Systems
  • "Data science with Vadalog: Knowledge Graphs with machine learning and reasoning in practice" (2021), published in Future Generation Computer Systems
  • "Equality-Friendly Well-Founded Semantics and Applications to Description Logics" (2021), published in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Semantic Optimization of Conjunctive Queries" (2020), published in Journal of the ACM
  • "HyperBench" (2021), published in ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics

Frequent co-authors include Matthias Lanzinger, Reinhard Pichler, Cem Okulmus, Davide Mario Longo, and Emanuel Sallinger. These collaborations have resulted in numerous joint publications contributing to the advancement of their core research areas.

Georg Gottlob's work has been published extensively in multiple venues. Notable publication venues are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Journal of the ACM
  • Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

The scientist has been recognized with several honors and awards, including:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom (2010)
  • ACM Fellow (2007) for contributions to the theory of artificial intelligence and database systems
  • Member of the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina (2006) in Informatics
  • Member of Academia Europaea (2006)

Best Publications

  • The DLV system for knowledge representation and reasoning

    Nicola Leone;Gerald Pfeifer;Wolfgang Faber;Thomas Eiter

  • Logic programming and databases

    Stefano Ceri;Georg Gottlob;Letizia Tanca

  • Complexity and expressive power of logic programming

    Evgeny Dantsin;Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob;Andrei Voronkov

  • Efficient algorithms for processing XPath queries

    Georg Gottlob;Christoph Koch;Reinhard Pichler

  • What you always wanted to know about Datalog (and never dared to ask)

    S. Ceri;G. Gottlob;L. Tanca

  • Visual Web Information Extraction with Lixto

    Robert Baumgartner;Sergio Flesca;Georg Gottlob

  • Taming the infinite chase: query answering under expressive relational constraints

    Andrea Calì;Georg Gottlob;Michael Kifer

  • Disjunctive datalog

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob;Heikki Mannila

  • A general Datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies

    Andrea Calí;Georg Gottlob;Thomas Lukasiewicz

  • On the complexity of propositional knowledge base revision, updates, and counterfactuals

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob

  • The complexity of logic-based abduction

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob

  • Identifying the Minimal Transversals of a Hypergraph and Related Problems

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob

  • A comparison of structural CSP decomposition methods

    Georg Gottlob;Nicola Leone;Francesco Scarcello

  • Complexity Results for Nonmonotonic Logics

    Georg Gottlob

  • On the computational cost of disjunctive logic programming: Propositional case

    Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob

  • Extending object-oriented systems with roles

    Georg Gottlob;Michael Schrefl;Brigitte Röck

  • Hypertree Decompositions and Tractable Queries

    Georg Gottlob;Nicola Leone;Francesco Scarcello

  • Visual and interactive wrapper generation, automated information extraction from web pages, and translation into xml

    Robert Baumgartner;Sergio Flesca;Georg Gottlob;Marcus Herzog

  • Pure Nash equilibria: hard and easy games

    Georg Gottlob;Gianluigi Greco;Francesco Scarcello

  • Monadic datalog and the expressive power of languages for Web information extraction

    Georg Gottlob;Christoph Koch

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicola Leone
Nicola Leone University of Calabria
Thomas Lukasiewicz
Thomas Lukasiewicz University of Oxford
Christoph Koch
Christoph Koch École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Stefano Ceri
Stefano Ceri Polytechnic University of Milan
Letizia Tanca
Letizia Tanca Polytechnic University of Milan
Thomas Schwentick
Thomas Schwentick TU Dortmund University
Gerhard Friedrich
Gerhard Friedrich University of Klagenfurt
Wolfgang Faber
Wolfgang Faber University of Klagenfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up a wide range of career opportunities in Computer Science and related fields. Flexible study options make it easier than ever to combine education with work or family commitments. Many students are now searching for the cheapest doctoral programs available, helping to minimize student debt while earning advanced credentials.

For those interested in educational leadership or moving into higher-level positions quickly, the fastest edd program online options are worth considering. These fast-track programs are designed for motivated students who want to complete their studies rapidly and move forward in their careers.

If you're looking for a faster pathway to start your professional journey, the best associate degree in 6 months online allows you to earn a recognized qualification in as little as half a year. This is an excellent choice for those eager to enter the workforce quickly or switch careers.

Additionally, many professionals explore technology-related roles within business as a career strategy. Understanding the online business degree cost can help you plan your education budget effectively, making long-term financial sense for aspiring business leaders and entrepreneurs.

Best Scientists Citing Georg Gottlob

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles