World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
46
Citations
11122
World Ranking
1210
National Ranking
523

Laurence Chalip publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence Chalip sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 110 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Laurence Chalip D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence Chalip sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurence Chalip is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States. Their primary fields of study encompass Social Sciences and Psychology, with a notable focus on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Safety Research, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

The researcher's work predominantly addresses topics related to Sport and Mega-Event Impacts, Sports, Gender, and Society, and the Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering. Other areas covered include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Youth Development and Social Support, Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking, and Management and Organizational Studies.

Recent published papers by Laurence Chalip include the following:

  • "The State of Play Between Managing Major Sports Events and Human Rights: a Scoping Review," 2023, Event Management
  • "Parental perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 and returning to play based on level of sport," 2021, Sport in Society
  • "Will event inspiration and leveraging improve sport participation among the games makers? An examination on volunteers of the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympic games," 2024, Sport Management Review
  • "Government policy responses to Covid-19 in sport: a comparative study of China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, UK and the USA," 2023, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
  • "Exploring the Nexus Between Events and Human Rights: Building Agendas for Research, Theory, and Practice," 2023, Event Management

Laurence Chalip has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Event Management
  • Sport in Society
  • Sport Management Review
  • International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics
  • Recreational Sports Journal

Collaboration has been a consistent element of their research, with frequent co-authors including Jason N. Bocarro, David Kanters, Michael A. Kanters, Shushu Chen, and Joerg Koenigstorfer.

Best Publications

  • Towards Social Leverage of Sport Events

    Laurence Chalip

  • Beyond impact: a general model for sport event leverage.

    L. Chalip

  • From Legacy to Leverage

    Laurence Chalip

  • Effects of Sport Event Media on Destination Image and Intention to Visit

    Laurence Chalip;B. Christine Green;Brad Andrew Hill

  • Sport tourism as the celebration of subculture

    B.Christine Green;Laurence Chalip

  • Building events into destination branding: insights from experts

    Leo Kenneth Jago;Laurence Chalip;Graham Brown;Trevor Mules

  • Toward a Distinctive Sport Management Discipline

    Laurence Chalip

  • Why travel to the FIFA World Cup? Effects of motives, background, interest, and constraints

    Nam Su Kim;Laurence Chalip

  • Sport Event Tourism and the Destination Brand: Towards a General Theory

    Laurence Chalip;Carla A. Costa

  • Bundling sport events with the host destination

    Laurence Chalip;Johanne McGuirty

  • Local Business Leveraging of a Sport Event: Managing an Event for Economic Benefit

    Laurence Chalip;Anna Leyns

  • Sport events and strategic leveraging: Pushing towards the triple bottom line

    Daniel James O'Brien;Laurence Chalip

  • Reconsidering the Role of Training in Event Volunteers’ Satisfaction

    Carla A. Costa;Laurence Chalip;B. Christine Green;Caet Simes

  • Impacts and strategic outcomes from non-mega sport events for local communities

    Marijke Taks;Laurence Hilmond Chalip;B. Christine Green

  • Effects of Hosting a Sport Event on Destination Brand: A Test of Co-branding and Match-up Models

    Xiaoyan Xing;Laurence Chalip

  • Social Policy for Sport Events: Leveraging (Relationships with) Teams from Other Nations for Community Benefit

    Pamm Kellett;Anne-Marie Hede;Laurence Chalip

  • Enduring involvement in youth soccer: The socialization of parent and child

    B. Christine Green;Laurence Chalip

  • Paths to volunteer commitment: lessons from the Sydney Olympic games.

    B. C. Green;L. Chalip

  • Evaluating Sport Development Outcomes: The Case of a Medium Sized International Sport Event

    Marijke Taks;B. Christine Green;Laura Misener;Laurence Chalip

  • Economic Impact Analysis Versus Cost Benefit Analysis: The Case of a Medium-Sized Sport Event

    Marijke Taks;Marijke Taks;Stefan Kesenne;Laurence Chalip;B. Christine Green

  • Executive training exercise in sport event leverage

    Daniel James O'Brien;Laurence Chalip

Frequent Co-Authors

Leo Kenneth Jago
Leo Kenneth Jago University of Surrey
James W. Stigler
James W. Stigler University of California, Los Angeles
Bill Faulkner
Bill Faulkner Griffith University
Arch G. Woodside
Arch G. Woodside Boston College
Reed W. Larson
Reed W. Larson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi Claremont Graduate University
Annette Pritchard
Annette Pritchard Leeds Beckett University
Nigel Morgan
Nigel Morgan Manchester Metropolitan University
Kyriaki Kaplanidou
Kyriaki Kaplanidou University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in flexible learning, the USA offers a wide array of online degrees catering to Business and Management fields. Whether you're aiming to upskill, change careers, or advance in your current role, online study can provide a valuable pathway.

Students looking for advanced leadership positions may find a doctorate in leadership to be a strategic choice. Graduates of this program often pursue roles such as senior executives, consultants, or organizational development specialists.

It’s essential to choose from good online colleges that are properly accredited, ensuring your degree is respected by employers and prepares you for real-world challenges.

Business students interested in the construction sector may consider a accelerated online construction management degree. This program is ideal for those wanting to quickly step into leadership roles within construction, project management, or real estate development.

Healthcare is another fast-growing area. A healthcare management degree online opens doors to administrative and managerial careers in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Laurence Chalip

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles