World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 87 1066 935 658 563 199 40378

Reed W. Larson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Reed W. Larson between 1974 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Reed W. Larson published across 51 years, from 1974 to 2024, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2002. 1 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2002. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 4 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 8 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1974 2024

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Reed W. Larson: publications per year, 1974 to 2024
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 4
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 1
1983 3
1984 4
1985 5
1986 2
1987 2
1988 3
1989 6
1990 8
1991 3
1992 1
1993 8
1994 3
1995 5
1996 5
1997 3
1998 5
1999 8
2000 3
2001 9
2002 17
2003 7
2004 4
2005 9
2006 9
2007 7
2008 2
2009 3
2010 2
2011 7
2012 5
2013 2
2014 7
2015 4
2016 4
2017 6
2018 2
2019 4
2020 8
2021 3
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 211
Download as CSV

Reed W. Larson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reed W. Larson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 199 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 199
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Reed W. Larson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reed W. Larson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 87
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Reed W. Larson is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a significant emphasis on Safety Research, Social Psychology, and Education within these broader areas.

The scientist's work addresses key topics in youth development and social support, early childhood education and development, and outdoor and experiential education. Additional research interests include adventure sports and sensation seeking, youth education and societal dynamics, teacher education and leadership studies, as well as career development and diversity.

Among their recent papers are:

  • How challenges and peers contribute to social-emotional learning in outdoor adventure education programs (2020, Journal of Adolescence)
  • Helping Teens Overcome Anxiety Episodes in Project Work: The Power of Reframing (2020, Journal of Adolescent Research)
  • A qualitative examination of critical feedback processes in project-based youth programs (2020, Contemporary Educational Psychology)
  • Youth Programs Are Important Spaces for Emotional Learning (2021, Journal of Youth Development)
  • Responding to Teenagers' Emotional Meltdowns: How Outward Bound Instructors Facilitate Development of Anxiety Management Skills (2022, Journal of Adolescent Research)

Frequent publication venues for Reed W. Larson's research include:

  • Journal of Adolescent Research
  • Journal of Adolescence
  • Contemporary Educational Psychology
  • Journal of Youth Development
  • Journal of Child and Youth Care Work

Frequent co-authors in their work are Carolyn Orson, Gina McGovern, Aisha N. Griffith, Haley Johnson, and Ellen K. Buttitta. These collaborations contribute to research spanning several publications in youth program development and adolescent emotional well-being.

Best Publications

  • Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method.

    Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi;Reed Larson

  • Toward a psychology of positive youth development

    Reed W. Larson

  • How children and adolescents spend time across the world: work, play, and developmental opportunities.

    Reed W. Larson;Suman Verma

  • Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans

    Reed Larson

  • Changes in Adolescents: Daily Interactions with Their Families from Ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and Transformation.

    Reed W. Larson;Maryse H. Richards;Giovanni Moneta;Grayson Holmbeck

  • The Experience Sampling Method

    Reed Larson;Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi

  • What Adolescents Learn in Organized Youth Activities: A Survey of Self-Reported Developmental Experiences.

    David M. Hansen;Reed W. Larson;Jodi B. Dworkin

  • Divergent Realities: The Emotional Lives Of Mothers, Fathers, And Adolescents

    Reed Larson;Maryse Heather Richards

  • Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: changing developmental contexts.

    Reed Larson;Maryse H. Richards

  • The ecology of adolescent activity and experience.

    Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi;Reed Larson;Suzanne Prescott

  • Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities.

    Reed W. Larson;David M. Hansen;Giovanni Moneta

  • Being Adolescent: Conflict And Growth In The Teenage Years

    Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi;Reed Larson

  • Continuity, Stability, and Change in Daily Emotional Experience across Adolescence

    Reed W. Larson;Giovanni Moneta;Maryse H. Richards;Suzanne Wilson

  • Adolescents' Accounts of Growth Experiences in Youth Activities

    Jodi B. Dworkin;Reed Larson;David Hansen

  • Organized activities as contexts of development : extracurricular activities, after-school, and community programs

    Joseph L. Mahoney;Reed W. Larson;Jacquelynne S. Eccles

  • Emotional Transmission in the Daily Lives of Families: A New Paradigm for Studying Family Process

    Reed W. Larson;David M. Almeida

  • Boredom in the Middle School Years: Blaming Schools versus Blaming Students.

    Reed W. Larson;Maryse H. Richards

  • Bulimia: an analysis of moods and behavior.

    Craig Johnson;Reed Larson

  • Stress and "storm and stress" in early adolescence: The relationship of negative events with dysphoric affect.

    Reed Larson;Mark Ham

  • The solitary side of life: An examination of the time people spend alone from childhood to old age.

    Reed W Larson

  • A comparison of youth‐driven and adult‐driven youth programs: Balancing inputs from youth and adults

    Reed Larson;Kathrin Walker;Nickki Pearce

Frequent Co-Authors

Maryse H. Richards
Maryse H. Richards Loyola University Chicago
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi Claremont Graduate University
Jeylan T. Mortimer
Jeylan T. Mortimer University of Minnesota
Marcela Raffaelli
Marcela Raffaelli University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
B. Bradford Brown
B. Bradford Brown University of Wisconsin–Madison
Douglas A. Kleiber
Douglas A. Kleiber University of Georgia
Jacquelynne S. Eccles
Jacquelynne S. Eccles University of California, Irvine
James Youniss
James Youniss Catholic University of America
Roger C. Mannell
Roger C. Mannell University of Waterloo
Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
Jeffrey Jensen Arnett Clark University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and related fields can open diverse career opportunities, from clinical work to leadership roles in social services. Many students aim to balance quality, value, and flexibility, making it vital to compare program options.

To help you make smart choices, check out the best value psychology programs in USA for comprehensive options that mix affordability with career impact. If you’re interested in social advocacy and direct support roles, consider accredited options like the best online social work bachelor's programs in the US, which prepare you for entry-level professional roles in diverse settings.

For learners based on the West Coast or seeking location-specific programs, exploring the top online social work programs in California can connect you with local field placements and emerging career networks in a high-demand area.

Ambitious professionals seeking doctoral-level expertise and leadership roles in academia, policy, or advanced practice should review the best online social work doctorate programs in the US for top-rated, flexible options.

Best Scientists Citing Reed W. Larson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles