World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9087 8489 4820 4387 87 7798

Edmond P. Bowers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edmond P. Bowers between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edmond P. Bowers published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2011. 8 of the 101 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2011. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
2006 2025

101 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edmond P. Bowers: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
2010 6
2011 12
2012 6
2013 5
2014 8
2015 11
2016 9
2017 3
2018 4
2019 5
2020 10
2021 7
2022 0
2023 5
2024 3
2025 5
Total 101
Download as CSV

Edmond P. Bowers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmond P. Bowers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 87
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Edmond P. Bowers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edmond P. Bowers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Edmond P. Bowers is affiliated with Clemson University in the United States and has contributed research primarily within the social sciences and psychology. Their work centers on youth development, education, and safety, with a significant focus on the intersection of environmental and social factors in adolescent growth.

The scientist's primary fields of study include Social Sciences, with 43 publications, and Psychology, with 19 publications. Their subfields demonstrate a concentration on Safety Research, Education, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Main topics covered in their works encompass Youth Development and Social Support, Early Childhood Education and Development, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Diverse Educational Innovations Studies, Resilience and Mental Health, Higher Education Research Studies, and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics.

Bowers has published frequently in venues such as Evaluation and Program Planning, Journal of Youth Development, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology, and Children and Youth Services Review. These venues reflect their commitment to applied developmental research and program evaluation in youth and educational contexts.

  • Positive Youth Development in 2020: Theory, Research, Programs, and the Promotion of Social Justice (2021), Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Critical consciousness in late adolescence: Understanding if, how, and why youth act (2020), Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • Nature as an Ecological Asset for Positive Youth Development: Empirical Evidence From Rural Communities (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • Influence of educator's emotional support behaviors on environmental education student outcomes (2020), Environmental Education Research
  • A randomized study of CrossFit Kids for fostering fitness and academic outcomes in middle school students (2020), Evaluation and Program Planning

They have frequently collaborated with co-authors including Barry A. Garst, William H. Quinn, Benjamin J. Parry, Lauren E. Stephens, and G. John Geldhof. These partnerships suggest interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches to youth development and education research.

Best Publications

  • Positive Youth Development

    Jacqueline V. Lerner;Erin Phelps;Yulika E. Forman;Edmond P. Bowers

  • The Five Cs Model of Positive Youth Development: A Longitudinal Analysis of Confirmatory Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance

    Edmond P. Bowers;Yibing Li;Megan K. Kiely;Aerika Brittian

  • Positive Youth Development and Relational-Developmental-Systems

    Richard M. Lerner;Jacqueline V. Lerner;Edmond P. Bowers;G. John Geldhof

  • Creation of short and very short measures of the five Cs of positive youth development

    G. J. Geldhof;Edmond P. Bowers;Michelle J. Boyd;Megan K. Mueller

  • Outdoor Time, Screen Time, and Connection to Nature: Troubling Trends Among Rural Youth?:

    Lincoln R. Larson;Rachel Szczytko;Edmond P. Bowers;Lauren E. Stephens

  • Positive Youth Development: Processes, Programs, and Problematics

    Richard M. Lerner;Jacqueline V. Lerner;Selva Lewin-Bizan;Edmond P. Bowers

  • Individual and Contextual Bases of Thriving in Adolescence: A View of the Issues.

    Richard M. Lerner;Jacqueline V. Lerner;Alexander von Eye;Edmond P. Bowers

  • The relation between teacher input and lexical growth of preschoolers.

    Edmond P. Bowers;Marina Vasilyeva

  • One good thing leads to another: Cascades of positive youth development among American adolescents

    Selva Lewin-Bizan;Edmond P. Bowers;Richard M. Lerner

  • Special issue introduction: the meaning and measurement of thriving: a view of the issues.

    Richard M. Lerner;Alexander von Eye;Jacqueline V. Lerner;Selva Lewin-Bizan

  • The role of school engagement in preventing adolescent delinquency and substance use: A survival analysis

    Yibing Li;Weigang Zhang;Jianjun Liu;Miriam R. Arbeit

  • Youth Development Program Participation and Intentional Self-Regulation Skills: Contextual and Individual Bases of Pathways to Positive Youth Development.

    Megan Kiely Mueller;Erin Phelps;Edmond P. Bowers;Jennifer P. Agans

  • Positive youth development: Processes, philosophies, and programs.

    Jacqueline V. Lerner;Edmond P. Bowers;Kelly Minor;Michelle J. Boyd

  • Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in bilingual children

    Marina Vasilyeva;Heidi Waterfall;Perla B. Gámez;Ligia E. Gómez

  • Developmental trajectories of intentional self regulation in adolescence: the role of parenting and implications for positive and problematic outcomes among diverse youth.

    Edmond P. Bowers;Steinunn Gestsdottir;G. John Geldhof;Jana Nikitin

  • Positive Youth Development in 2020: Theory, Research, Programs, and the Promotion of Social Justice.

    Richard M Lerner;Jacqueline V Lerner;Velma McBride Murry;Emilie Phillips Smith

  • Promoting positive youth development in the face of contextual changes and challenges: the roles of individual strengths and ecological assets.

    Richard M. Lerner;Edmond P. Bowers;G. John Geldhof;Steinunn Gestsdóttir

  • Longitudinal Analysis of a Very Short Measure of Positive Youth Development

    G. John Geldhof;Edmond P. Bowers;Megan Kiely Mueller;Christopher Michael Napolitano

  • Intentional self regulation in middle adolescence: the emerging role of loss-based selection in positive youth development.

    Steinunn Gestsdottir;Edmond Bowers;Alexander von Eye;Christopher M. Napolitano

  • Important non-parental adults and positive youth development across mid- to late-adolescence: the moderating effect of parenting profiles.

    Edmond P. Bowers;Sara K. Johnson;Mary H. Buckingham;Santiago Gasca

  • Special Section Introduction: Thriving in Context: Findings from the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development

    G. John Geldhof;Edmond P. Bowers;Richard M. Lerner

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Jacqueline V. Lerner
Jacqueline V. Lerner Boston College
G. John Geldhof
G. John Geldhof Oregon State University
Alexander von Eye
Alexander von Eye Michigan State University
Velma McBride Murry
Velma McBride Murry Vanderbilt University
Heidi M. Zinzow
Heidi M. Zinzow Clemson University
Emilie Phillips Smith
Emilie Phillips Smith University of Georgia
Martie P. Thompson
Martie P. Thompson Appalachian State University
Seth J. Schwartz
Seth J. Schwartz The University of Texas at Austin
Michelle M. Martel
Michelle M. Martel University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide variety of online programs and diverse career paths. From becoming a mental health counselor to advancing in psychology research or organizational roles, online degrees can help you meet the necessary educational requirements.

When considering a counseling career, it's important to know that licensing and certification requirements vary significantly depending on location. For example, Bakersfield mental health counselor certification requirements differ from those in other cities.

Each state and even some cities have unique expectations for education, supervised experience, and examination. Before enrolling in an online program, check the specific mental health counselor requirements in Baltimore, Boise mental health counselor certification requirements, and mental health counselor requirements in Boston to ensure your degree will be fully recognized.

Ultimately, earning a psychology degree online offers flexibility but requires careful planning. Research your preferred location’s requirements to be confident you are on the right path toward licensure and a rewarding career in mental health or a related field.

Best Scientists Citing Edmond P. Bowers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles