World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5736
World Ranking
9811
National Ranking
5190

Amy I. Nathanson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy I. Nathanson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Amy I. Nathanson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy I. Nathanson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amy I. Nathanson is a researcher affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their work spans multiple disciplines within the social sciences and environmental science, focusing on various subfields and topics that contribute to both academic and applied knowledge.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Environmental Science

The subfields in which they have contributed include:

  • Education
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Insect Science

The primary topics in their research are:

  • Forest ecology and management
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Amy I. Nathanson include:

  • Sleep and Technology in Early Childhood (2020), published in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
  • Contexts for Family Talk about Racism: Historical, Dyadic, and Geographic (2020), published in Journal of Family Communication
  • United States Forest Service Use of Forest Inventory Data: Examples and Needs for Small Area Estimation (2021), published in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • Counter-stereotypical, yet Counterproductive? How Families at a Science Museum Respond to Narratives that Defy Gender Stereotypes (2021), published in Media Psychology
  • Quantifying old-growth forest of United States Forest Service public lands (2023), published in Forest Ecology and Management

The frequent co-authors with whom Nathanson has collaborated include:

  • Kristen A. Pelz
  • Greg Hayward
  • Andrew N. Gray
  • E. Berryman
  • Christopher W. Woodall

Common publication venues where their research has appeared are:

  • Media Psychology
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
  • Journal of Family Communication
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America

Best Publications

  • Identifying and Explaining the Relationship Between Parental Mediation and Children's Aggression

    Amy I. Nathanson

  • Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics An Analysis of the Third-Person Effect

    Douglas M. McLEOD;William P. Eveland;Amy I. Nathanson

  • Parent and Child Perspectives on the Presence and Meaning of Parental Television Mediation

    Amy I. Nathanson

  • Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary Perceived Likelihood of Expsoure and the Third-Person Perception

    William P. Eveland;Amy I. Nathanson;Benjamin H. Detenber;Douglas M. McLEOD

  • The Unintended Effects of Parental Mediation of Television on Adolescents

    Amy I. Nathanson

  • The Relation between Television Exposure and Executive Function among Preschoolers.

    Amy Nathanson;Fashina Mira Alade;Molly Sharp;Eric E Rasmussen

  • Protective effects of parental monitoring of children's media use: a prospective study.

    Douglas A. Gentile;Rachel A. Reimer;Amy I. Nathanson;David A. Walsh

  • Do You See What I See? Parent and Child Reports of Parental Monitoring of Media

    Douglas A. Gentile;Amy I. Nathanson;Eric E. Rasmussen;Rachel A. Reimer

  • Parenting and digital media

    Sarah M. Coyne;Jenny Radesky;Kevin M. Collier;Douglas A. Gentile

  • Reducing the Aggression-Promoting Effect of Violent Cartoons By Increasing Children's Fictional Involvement with the Victim: A Study of Active Mediation

    Amy I. Nathanson;Joanne Cantor

  • Mediation of children's television viewing: Working toward conceptual clarity and common understanding.

    Amy I. Nathanson

  • Children's fright reactions to television news.

    Joanne Cantor;Amy I. Nathanson

  • Parents Versus Peers Exploring the Significance of Peer Mediation of Antisocial Television

    Amy I. Nathanson

  • Factual and Evaluative Approaches to Modifying Children's Responses to Violent Television1

    Unknown

  • The effects of mediation content and form on children's responses to violent television

    Amy I. Nathanson;Mong-Shan Yang

  • The relation between television exposure and theory of mind among preschoolers

    Amy I. Nathanson;Molly L. Sharp;Fashina Aladé;Eric E. Rasmussen

  • Perceived Media Influence and Efficacy as Predictors of Caregivers' Protective Behaviors

    Amy I. Nathanson;William P. Eveland;Hee-Sun Park;Bryant Paul

  • Prime-time television: Assessing violence during the most popular viewing hours

    Stacy L. Smith;Amy I. Nathanson;Barbara Jan Wilson

  • Children of the Net: An Empirical Exploration into the Evaluation of Internet Content

    Matthew S Eastin;Mong Shan Yang;Amy I. Nathanson

  • Shaping the Effects of Television on Adolescents' Body Image Disturbance: The Role of Parental Mediation

    Amy I. Nathanson;Renée A. Botta

  • Predictors of children's interest in violent television programs

    Joanne Cantor;Amy I. Nathanson

  • TV Viewing Compared to Book Reading and Toy Playing Reduces Responsive Maternal Communication with Toddlers and Preschoolers

    Amy I. Nathanson;Eric E. Rasmussen

Frequent Co-Authors

William P. Eveland
William P. Eveland The Ohio State University
Joanne Cantor
Joanne Cantor University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sarah M. Coyne
Sarah M. Coyne Brigham Young University
Douglas A. Gentile
Douglas A. Gentile Iowa State University
David A. Walsh
David A. Walsh University of Nottingham
Elizabeth M. Perse
Elizabeth M. Perse University of Delaware
Matthew S. Eastin
Matthew S. Eastin The University of Texas at Austin
Brad J. Bushman
Brad J. Bushman The Ohio State University
Laura B. Stephenson
Laura B. Stephenson University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open the door to a wide range of careers, including specialized fields like behavior analysis. If you’re passionate about helping individuals with behavioral or developmental challenges, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a rewarding path to consider.

Many online programs offer coursework that fulfills BCBA education requirements, but it’s important to understand what each state or region specifically requires. For example, you can find detailed information about bcba certification requirements in Albuquerque, as well as the steps for how to become a bcba in Anaheim.

Requirements can differ based on location, including differences in practicum opportunities, supervised hours, or state-specific exams. For those considering working in Alaska, it’s helpful to review the Anchorage bcba requirements. If you’re looking into options in other areas, such as Virginia, make sure you’re aware of the current Arlington bcba education requirements.

No matter where you plan to study or work, choosing an accredited online psychology program will help ensure eligibility for BCBAs and other professional credentials in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Amy I. Nathanson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles