World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
10244
World Ranking
4948
National Ranking
59

Markus Fiebig publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Fiebig sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 211 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Markus Fiebig D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Fiebig sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Fiebig is affiliated with the Norwegian Institute for Air Research in Norway. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a specialized emphasis on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work addresses various subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Information Systems, and Geochemistry and Petrology. The main research topics include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • Geological Modeling and Analysis

Fiebig has contributed to multiple scientific articles, with recent publications including:

  • "A global analysis of climate-relevant aerosol properties retrieved from the network of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) near-surface observatories," 2020, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • "Multidecadal trend analysis of in situ aerosol radiative properties around the world," 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Changes in black carbon emissions over Europe due to COVID-19 lockdowns," 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Seasonality of the particle number concentration and size distribution: a global analysis retrieved from the network of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) near-surface observatories," 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Atmospheric composition in the European Arctic and 30 years of the Zeppelin Observatory, Ny-Ålesund," 2022, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

The venues in which these works appear frequently include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Environment International

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Fiebig's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Cathrine Lund Myhre
  • Paolo Laj
  • Alfred Wiedensohler
  • Konstantinos Eleftheriadis
  • Wenche Aas

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for reporting "black carbon" measurements

    Andreas Petzold;John A. Ogren;Markus Fiebig;Pablo Laj

  • Mobility particle size spectrometers: harmonization of technical standards and data structure to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions

    A. Wiedensohler;W. Birmili;A. Nowak;A. Sonntag

  • Introduction to the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and observed atmospheric composition change during 1972–2009

    K. Tørseth;W. Aas;K. Breivik;A. M. Fjæraa

  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Database and Metrics Data of Global Surface Ozone Observations

    Martin G. Schultz;Sabine Schröder;Olga Lyapina;Owen Cooper

  • Comparison of methods for deriving aerosol asymmetry parameter

    Elisabeth Andrews;Patrick J. Sheridan;Markus Fiebig;Markus Fiebig;Allison McComiskey

  • Number size distributions and seasonality of submicron particles in europe 2008–2009

    A. Asmi;A. Wiedensohler;P. Laj;A. M Fjaeraa

  • Airborne measurements of dust layer properties, particle size distribution and mixing state of Saharan dust during SAMUM 2006

    Bernadett Weinzierl;Andreas Petzold;Michael Esselborn;Martin Wirth

  • Optical and microphysical characterization of biomass-burning and industrial-pollution aerosols from multiwavelength lidar and aircraft measurements.

    Ulla Wandinger;Detlef Müller;Christine Böckmann;Dietrich Althausen

  • A European aerosol phenomenology-5 : Climatology of black carbon optical properties at 9 regional background sites across Europe

    M. Zanatta;M. Gysel;N. Bukowiecki;T. Müller

  • Saharan dust absorption and refractive index from aircraft‐based observations during SAMUM 2006

    Andreas Petzold;Katharina Rasp;Bernadett Weinzierl;Michael Esselborn

  • Ultrafine particle size distributions measured in aircraft exhaust plumes

    Charles A. Brock;Franz Schröder;Bernd Kärcher;Andreas Petzold

  • Intercomparison and evaluation of global aerosol microphysical properties among AeroCom models of a range of complexity

    G.W. Mann;K.S. Carslaw;C.L. Reddington;K.J. Pringle;K.J. Pringle

  • Aerosol decadal trends – Part 1: In-situ optical measurements at GAW and IMPROVE stations

    M. Collaud Coen;E. Andrews;E. Andrews;A. Asmi;U. Baltensperger

  • The influence of cruise ship emissions on air pollution in Svalbard - a harbinger of a more polluted Arctic?

    S. Eckhardt;O. Hermansen;H. Grythe;H. Grythe;M. Fiebig

  • Seasonality of aerosol optical properties in the Arctic

    Lauren Schmeisser;Lauren Schmeisser;Lauren Schmeisser;John Backman;John A. Ogren;John A. Ogren;Elisabeth Andrews

  • Comprehensive particle characterization from three-wavelength Raman-lidar observations: case study.

    Detlef Müller;Ulla Wandinger;Dietrich Althausen;Markus Fiebig

  • On Aethalometer measurement uncertainties and an instrument correction factor for the Arctic

    John Backman;Lauren N. Schmeisser;Lauren N. Schmeisser;Aki Virkkula;Aki Virkkula;Aki Virkkula;John A. Ogren;John A. Ogren

  • How do long-term development and periodical changes of river-floodplain systems affect the fate of contaminants? Results from European rivers

    G.J. Lair;F. Zehetner;M. Fiebig;M.H. Gerzabek

  • Optical closure for an aerosol column: Method, accuracy, and inferable properties applied to a biomass‐burning aerosol and its radiative forcing

    Markus Fiebig;Andreas Petzold;Ulla Wandinger;Manfred Wendisch

  • A global analysis of climate-relevant aerosol properties retrieved from the network of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) near-surface observatories

    Paolo Laj;Paolo Laj;Alessandro Bigi;Clémence Rose;Elisabeth Andrews;Elisabeth Andrews

  • Multidecadal trend analysis of in situ aerosol radiative properties around the world

    Martine Collaud Coen;Elisabeth Andrews;Elisabeth Andrews;Andrés Alastuey;Todor Petkov Arsov

  • A European aerosol phenomenology - 6: Scattering properties of atmospheric aerosol particles from 28 ACTRIS sites

    Marco Pandolfi;Lucas Alados-Arboledas;Andrés Alastuey;Marcos Andrade

  • The influence of cruise ship emissions on air pollution in Svalbard

    Sabine Eckhardt;Ove Hermansen;Henrik Grythe;Markus Fiebig

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Petzold
Andreas Petzold Forschungszentrum Jülich
Paolo Laj
Paolo Laj Grenoble Alpes University
Urs Baltensperger
Urs Baltensperger Paul Scherrer Institute
John A. Ogren
John A. Ogren National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Elisabeth Andrews
Elisabeth Andrews Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Alfred Wiedensohler
Alfred Wiedensohler Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research
Karl Espen Yttri
Karl Espen Yttri Norwegian Institute for Air Research
Andreas Stohl
Andreas Stohl University of Vienna
Erik Swietlicki
Erik Swietlicki Lund University
Karine Sellegri
Karine Sellegri University of Clermont Auvergne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge in Environmental Sciences, pursuing online degrees can provide valuable flexibility and accessibility. Many students explore options beyond traditional programs, seeking specialized credentials like education doctoral programs without dissertation requirements. These programs streamline the path to doctoral success, allowing professionals to focus on practical applications rather than intensive research projects.

Additionally, pathways such as online EDS to EdD programs are ideal for educators aiming to elevate their careers within environmental education or policy. These programs often emphasize leadership and administration, equipping graduates for influential roles in academia and community organizations.

For individuals dedicated to social impact through environmental advocacy, fully funded DSW programs offer a unique blend of social work and environmental concern. This approach prepares graduates to address ecological issues through community engagement and policy development with a social justice perspective.

Lastly, for those seeking broad foundational knowledge, best affordable online general studies degree programs provide a versatile education that can complement various environmental career goals. These degrees support learners in building critical thinking and interdisciplinary skills essential in tackling today’s environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Fiebig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles