World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 45 7269 7058 3171 3051 220 7319

Wendy Ju publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wendy Ju between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wendy Ju published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2024. 35 of the 314 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2024. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 13 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 34 publications 2026: 1 publication
2001 2026

314 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wendy Ju: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 3
2005 2
2006 1
2007 2
2008 3
2009 1
2010 6
2011 5
2012 7
2013 1
2014 13
2015 30
2016 37
2017 27
2018 18
2019 12
2020 16
2021 16
2022 13
2023 22
2024 38
2025 34
2026 1
Total 314
Download as CSV

Wendy Ju publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wendy Ju sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 212–221 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 220 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490 220
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Wendy Ju D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wendy Ju sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 45
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wendy Ju is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has produced extensive research primarily within the field of Computer Science, focusing on areas including Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their work frequently addresses topics related to Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Transportation and Mobility Innovations, Traffic and Road Safety, Persona Design and Applications, and Interactive and Immersive Displays.

Wendy Ju has authored numerous publications in several venues, with the highest number appearing in arXiv (Cornell University). Other frequent publication venues include Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, SSRN Electronic Journal, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, and Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies.

Some of their recent papers include the following:

  • "My Bad! Repairing Intelligent Voice Assistant Errors Improves Interaction" (2021), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "XR-OOM: MiXed Reality driving simulation with real cars for research and design" (2022), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Unmaking as Agonism: Using Participatory Design with Youth to Surface Difference in an Intergenerational Urban Context" (2022), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Strangers in a Strange Land: New Experimental System for Understanding Driving Culture Using VR" (2022), IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
  • "Learning When Agents Can Talk to Drivers Using the INAGT Dataset and Multisensor Fusion" (2021), Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Frequent collaborators in Wendy Ju's research include Alexandra Bremers, Fanjun Bu, Ilan Mandel, Natalie Friedman, and Sharon Yavo-Ayalon.

Best Publications

  • Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance

    Jeamin Koo;Jungsuk Kwac;Wendy Ju;Martin Steinert

  • Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles

    Dirk Rothenbucher;Jamy Li;David Sirkin;Brian Mok

  • Designing robots with movement in mind

    Guy Hoffman;Wendy Ju

  • Expressing thought: improving robot readability with animation principles

    Leila Takayama;Doug Dooley;Wendy Ju

  • Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do

    Leila Takayama;Wendy Ju;Clifford Nass

  • The Design of Implicit Interactions: Making Interactive Systems Less Obnoxious

    Wendy Ju;Larry Leifer

  • Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration

    Florian Floyd Mueller;Pedro Lopes;Paul Strohmeier;Wendy Ju

  • Emergency, Automation Off: Unstructured Transition Timing for Distracted Drivers of Automated Vehicles

    Brian Mok;Mishel Johns;Key Jung Lee;David Miller

  • Social robots and virtual agents as lecturers for video instruction

    Jamy Li;René Kizilcec;Jeremy Bailenson;Wendy Ju

  • Range: exploring implicit interaction through electronic whiteboard design

    Wendy Ju;Brian A. Lee;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support

    David Sirkin;Brian Mok;Stephen Yang;Wendy Ju

  • Distraction Becomes Engagement in Automated Driving

    David Miller;Annabel Sun;Annabel Sun;Mishel Johns;Hillary Ive

  • CounterActive: an interactive cookbook for the kitchen counter

    Wendy Ju;Rebecca Hurwitz;Tilke Judd;Bonny Lee

  • Just Breathe: In-Car Interventions for Guided Slow Breathing

    Pablo E. Paredes;Yijun Zhou;Nur Al-Huda Hamdan;Stephanie Balters

  • The RRADS platform: a real road autonomous driving simulator

    Sonia Baltodano;Srinath Sibi;Nikolas Martelaro;Nikhil Gowda

  • Consistency in physical and on-screen action improves perceptions of telepresence robots

    David Sirkin;Wendy Ju

  • VR-OOM: Virtual Reality On-rOad driving siMulation

    David Goedicke;Jamy Li;Vanessa Evers;Wendy Ju

  • Timing of unstructured transitions of control in automated driving

    Brian Ka-Jun Mok;Mishel Johns;Key Jung Lee;Hillary Page Ive

  • Behavioral Measurement of Trust in Automation: The Trust Fall

    David Miller;Mishel Johns;Brian Mok;Nikhil Gowda

  • The Design of Implicit Interactions

    Larry Leifer;Wendy G. Ju

  • Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

    Marcus Foth;Wendy Ju;Ronald Schroeter;Stephen Viller

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry Leifer
Larry Leifer Stanford University
Marcus Foth
Marcus Foth Queensland University of Technology
Scott R. Klemmer
Scott R. Klemmer University of California, San Diego
Manfred Tscheligi
Manfred Tscheligi University of Salzburg
James A. Landay
James A. Landay Stanford University
Clifford Nass
Clifford Nass Stanford University
Linda Ng Boyle
Linda Ng Boyle University of Washington
Guy Hoffman
Guy Hoffman Cornell University
Helen Nissenbaum
Helen Nissenbaum Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online education and career options. For those looking to start quickly, earning an associate's degree online can be a flexible and cost-effective entry point into the tech industry. These programs often cover core concepts and can help you build foundational skills without the commitment of a four-year degree.

Affordability is another key consideration. Prospective students should research the most affordable online colleges to reduce student debt while still receiving a quality education. If academic records are a concern, there are several reputable online colleges that accept low gpa, making higher education more accessible to a wider range of learners.

Computer science graduates aren’t limited to just tech roles. Many transition into interdisciplinary fields, such as environmental science, using their analytical skills to address global issues. If you’re interested in exploring high-paying opportunities outside of computing, consider researching high-paying jobs with environmental science degree as an alternative or complement to your current studies.

Best Scientists Citing Wendy Ju

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles