World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
7319
World Ranking
7269
National Ranking
3171

Wendy Ju publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wendy Ju sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 220 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Wendy Ju D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wendy Ju sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wendy Ju is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has produced extensive research primarily within the field of Computer Science, focusing on areas including Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

Their work frequently addresses topics related to Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Transportation and Mobility Innovations, Traffic and Road Safety, Persona Design and Applications, and Interactive and Immersive Displays.

Wendy Ju has authored numerous publications in several venues, with the highest number appearing in arXiv (Cornell University). Other frequent publication venues include Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, SSRN Electronic Journal, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, and Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies.

Some of their recent papers include the following:

  • "My Bad! Repairing Intelligent Voice Assistant Errors Improves Interaction" (2021), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • "XR-OOM: MiXed Reality driving simulation with real cars for research and design" (2022), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Unmaking as Agonism: Using Participatory Design with Youth to Surface Difference in an Intergenerational Urban Context" (2022), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Strangers in a Strange Land: New Experimental System for Understanding Driving Culture Using VR" (2022), IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
  • "Learning When Agents Can Talk to Drivers Using the INAGT Dataset and Multisensor Fusion" (2021), Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies

Frequent collaborators in Wendy Ju's research include Alexandra Bremers, Fanjun Bu, Ilan Mandel, Natalie Friedman, and Sharon Yavo-Ayalon.

Best Publications

  • Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance

    Jeamin Koo;Jungsuk Kwac;Wendy Ju;Martin Steinert

  • Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles

    Dirk Rothenbucher;Jamy Li;David Sirkin;Brian Mok

  • Designing robots with movement in mind

    Guy Hoffman;Wendy Ju

  • Expressing thought: improving robot readability with animation principles

    Leila Takayama;Doug Dooley;Wendy Ju

  • Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do

    Leila Takayama;Wendy Ju;Clifford Nass

  • The Design of Implicit Interactions: Making Interactive Systems Less Obnoxious

    Wendy Ju;Larry Leifer

  • Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration

    Florian Floyd Mueller;Pedro Lopes;Paul Strohmeier;Wendy Ju

  • Emergency, Automation Off: Unstructured Transition Timing for Distracted Drivers of Automated Vehicles

    Brian Mok;Mishel Johns;Key Jung Lee;David Miller

  • Social robots and virtual agents as lecturers for video instruction

    Jamy Li;René Kizilcec;Jeremy Bailenson;Wendy Ju

  • Range: exploring implicit interaction through electronic whiteboard design

    Wendy Ju;Brian A. Lee;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Mechanical Ottoman: How Robotic Furniture Offers and Withdraws Support

    David Sirkin;Brian Mok;Stephen Yang;Wendy Ju

  • Distraction Becomes Engagement in Automated Driving

    David Miller;Annabel Sun;Annabel Sun;Mishel Johns;Hillary Ive

  • CounterActive: an interactive cookbook for the kitchen counter

    Wendy Ju;Rebecca Hurwitz;Tilke Judd;Bonny Lee

  • Just Breathe: In-Car Interventions for Guided Slow Breathing

    Pablo E. Paredes;Yijun Zhou;Nur Al-Huda Hamdan;Stephanie Balters

  • The RRADS platform: a real road autonomous driving simulator

    Sonia Baltodano;Srinath Sibi;Nikolas Martelaro;Nikhil Gowda

  • Consistency in physical and on-screen action improves perceptions of telepresence robots

    David Sirkin;Wendy Ju

  • VR-OOM: Virtual Reality On-rOad driving siMulation

    David Goedicke;Jamy Li;Vanessa Evers;Wendy Ju

  • Timing of unstructured transitions of control in automated driving

    Brian Ka-Jun Mok;Mishel Johns;Key Jung Lee;Hillary Page Ive

  • Behavioral Measurement of Trust in Automation: The Trust Fall

    David Miller;Mishel Johns;Brian Mok;Nikhil Gowda

  • The Design of Implicit Interactions

    Larry Leifer;Wendy G. Ju

  • Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems

    Marcus Foth;Wendy Ju;Ronald Schroeter;Stephen Viller

Frequent Co-Authors

Larry Leifer
Larry Leifer Stanford University
Marcus Foth
Marcus Foth Queensland University of Technology
Scott R. Klemmer
Scott R. Klemmer University of California, San Diego
Manfred Tscheligi
Manfred Tscheligi University of Salzburg
James A. Landay
James A. Landay Stanford University
Clifford Nass
Clifford Nass Stanford University
Linda Ng Boyle
Linda Ng Boyle University of Washington
Guy Hoffman
Guy Hoffman Cornell University
Helen Nissenbaum
Helen Nissenbaum Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online education and career options. For those looking to start quickly, earning an associate's degree online can be a flexible and cost-effective entry point into the tech industry. These programs often cover core concepts and can help you build foundational skills without the commitment of a four-year degree.

Affordability is another key consideration. Prospective students should research the most affordable online colleges to reduce student debt while still receiving a quality education. If academic records are a concern, there are several reputable online colleges that accept low gpa, making higher education more accessible to a wider range of learners.

Computer science graduates aren’t limited to just tech roles. Many transition into interdisciplinary fields, such as environmental science, using their analytical skills to address global issues. If you’re interested in exploring high-paying opportunities outside of computing, consider researching high-paying jobs with environmental science degree as an alternative or complement to your current studies.

Best Scientists Citing Wendy Ju

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles