World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
11543
World Ranking
3678
National Ranking
1757

Bilge Mutlu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bilge Mutlu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 219 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bilge Mutlu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bilge Mutlu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bilge Mutlu is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans several fields of study, with a primary focus on Computer Science and Psychology. Within these broad areas, their work targets subfields including Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The research output of Bilge Mutlu covers a diverse range of topics. Notable main subjects include Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), AI in Service Interactions, Robotic Path Planning Algorithms, Teleoperation and Haptic Systems, Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on the intersection of human and machine collaboration as well as social interaction with technology. Representative publications include:

  • "Human-machine teaming is key to AI adoption: clinicians' experiences with a deployed machine learning system," 2022, npj Digital Medicine
  • "Human Robot Collaboration for Enhancing Work Activities," 2022, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • "Sex and Gender Differences in Emotion Recognition and Theory of Mind After TBI: A Narrative Review and Directions for Future Research," 2020, Frontiers in Neurology
  • "The Unboxing Experience: Exploration and Design of Initial Interactions Between Children and Social Robots," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Polite or Direct? Conversation Design of a Smart Display for Older Adults Based on Politeness Theory," 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Bilge Mutlu collaborates frequently with several researchers. The most common coauthors include Michael Gleicher, Bengisu Çağıltay, Robert G. Radwin, Emmanuel Senft, and Michael Zinn.

Their research is often published in venues that focus on human-computer interaction and robotics. Frequent publication venues consist of arXiv (Cornell University), Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Interaction Design and Children, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, and the 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

Best Publications

  • Human-robot proxemics: physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction

    Jonathan Mumm;Bilge Mutlu

  • Footing in human-robot conversations: how robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues

    Bilge Mutlu;Toshiyuki Shiwa;Takayuki Kanda;Hiroshi Ishiguro

  • Robots in organizations: the role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction

    Bilge Mutlu;Jodi Forlizzi

  • A Storytelling Robot: Modeling and Evaluation of Human-like Gaze Behavior

    B. Mutlu;J. Forlizzi;J. Hodgins

  • Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement

    Daniel Szafir;Bilge Mutlu

  • MACH: my automated conversation coach

    Mohammed (Ehsan) Hoque;Matthieu Courgeon;Jean-Claude Martin;Bilge Mutlu

  • Designing persuasive robots: how robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues

    Vijay Chidambaram;Yueh-Hsuan Chiang;Bilge Mutlu

  • Conversational gaze aversion for humanlike robots

    Sean Andrist;Xiang Zhi Tan;Michael Gleicher;Bilge Mutlu

  • Embodiment in Socially Interactive Robots

    Eric C. Deng;Bilge Mutlu;Maja J. Matarić

  • Nonverbal leakage in robots: communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior

    Bilge Mutlu;Fumitaka Yamaoka;Takayuki Kanda;Hiroshi Ishiguro

  • A Review of Eye Gaze in Virtual Agents, Social Robotics and HCI: Behaviour Generation, User Interaction and Perception

    K. Ruhland;C. E. Peters;S. Andrist;J. B. Badler;J. B. Badler

  • The Social Impact of a Robot Co-Worker in Industrial Settings

    Allison Sauppé;Bilge Mutlu

  • Communicating Directionality in Flying Robots

    Daniel Szafir;Bilge Mutlu;Terrence Fong

  • Conversational gaze mechanisms for humanlike robots

    Bilge Mutlu;Takayuki Kanda;Jodi Forlizzi;Jessica Hodgins

  • Look Like Me: Matching Robot Personality via Gaze to Increase Motivation

    Sean Andrist;Bilge Mutlu;Adriana Tapus

  • How Do Humans Teach: On Curriculum Learning and Teaching Dimension

    Faisal Khan;Bilge Mutlu;Xiaojin Zhu

  • Communication of intent in assistive free flyers

    Daniel Szafir;Bilge Mutlu;Terrence Fong

  • Using gaze patterns to predict task intent in collaboration.

    Chien-Ming Huang;Sean Andrist;Allison Sauppé;Bilge Mutlu

  • Designing motivational agents: The role of praise, social comparison, and embodiment in computer feedback

    Jonathan Mumm;Bilge Mutlu

  • Anticipatory Robot Control for Efficient Human-Robot Collaboration

    Chien-Ming Huang;Bilge Mutlu

  • Robust, low-cost, non-intrusive sensing and recognition of seated postures

    Bilge Mutlu;Andreas Krause;Jodi Forlizzi;Carlos Guestrin

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Gleicher
Michael Gleicher University of Wisconsin–Madison
Lyn S. Turkstra
Lyn S. Turkstra McMaster University
Melissa C. Duff
Melissa C. Duff Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Jodi Forlizzi
Jodi Forlizzi Carnegie Mellon University
Takayuki Kanda
Takayuki Kanda Kyoto University
Jessica K. Hodgins
Jessica K. Hodgins Carnegie Mellon University
Maja J. Matarić
Maja J. Matarić University of Southern California
Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
Michelle W. Voss
Michelle W. Voss University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the demand for tech professionals growing, students pursuing Computer Science in the USA may find it valuable to explore related online degrees and career pathways. Whether you are seeking a broader skill set or wish to specialize further, online programs offer flexible ways to build expertise and advance your career.

For those interested in science and technology, an online physics bachelor's degree can open doors in research, engineering, and data analytics. If you’re drawn to the fast-growing world of AI, analytics, or machine learning, consider pursuing a data science learning path to develop invaluable skills in data interpretation and management.

Engineering-minded students should explore the best online electrical engineering programs USA, which can lead to dynamic roles in various industries, from robotics to renewable energy. Additionally, for quick entry into the workforce or career pivoting, there are easy certifications to get that can offer impressive salary prospects with minimal time investment.

Best Scientists Citing Bilge Mutlu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles