World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
159
Citations
89523
World Ranking
23
National Ranking
13

Eric Horvitz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Horvitz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 832 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Eric Horvitz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Horvitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 159 D-Index — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United States Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United States Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United States Leader Award
  • 2015 - ACM AAAI Allen Newell Award For contributions to artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction spanning the computing and decision sciences through developing principles and models of sensing, reflection, and rational action.
  • 2015 - AAAI Feigenbaum Prize "For sustained and high-impact contributions to the field of artificial intelligence through the development of computational models of perception, reflection and action, and their application in time-critical decision making, and intelligent information, traffic and healthcare systems."
  • 2014 - ACM Fellow For contributions to artificial intelligence, and human-computer interaction.
  • 2013 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For computational mechanisms for decision making under uncertainty and with bounded resources.
  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2002 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to principles and applications of probability and utility in computation, including reasoning and decision making under limited resources, human-computer interaction, and machine learning.

Overview

Eric Horvitz is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, particularly in artificial intelligence. Their research spans multiple subfields including artificial intelligence, molecular biology, health informatics, public health, environmental and occupational health, and family practice.

The scientist's scholarly work covers a variety of main topics such as:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Recent publications by Eric Horvitz include the following papers:

  • "Predicting Depression via Social Media," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Large Language Model Influence on Diagnostic Reasoning," 2024, JAMA Network Open
  • "Cooperative AI: machines must learn to find common ground," 2021, Nature

Frequent co-authors associated with Eric Horvitz include:

  • Daniel S. Weld
  • Tom Hope
  • Adam Fourney
  • Jonathan H. Chen
  • Besmira Nushi

The scientist regularly publishes in prominent venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Nature Communications

Eric Horvitz has received multiple awards in recognition of their work, including:

  • AAAI Feigenbaum Prize (2015) for contributions to computational models of perception, reflection, and action, and their applications in decision making and intelligent systems
  • ACM AAAI Allen Newell Award (2015) for contributions spanning artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction
  • ACM Fellow (2014) for contributions to artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction
  • Member of the National Academy of Engineering (2013) for computational mechanisms for decision making
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2011)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2009)
  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2002) for significant contributions to principles and applications of probability and utility in computation

Best Publications

  • A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-Mail

    Mehran Sahami;Susan Dumais;David Heckerman;Eric Horvitz

  • Predicting Depression via Social Media

    Munmun De Choudhury;Michael Gamon;Scott Counts;Eric Horvitz

  • Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces

    Eric Horvitz

  • Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction

    Saleema Amershi;Dan Weld;Mihaela Vorvoreanu;Adam Fourney

  • Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities

    Jaime Teevan;Susan T. Dumais;Eric Horvitz

  • A technique which utilizes a probabilistic classifier to detect "junk" e-mail

    Eric Horvitz;David E. Heckerman;Susan T. Dumais;Mehran Sahami

  • A diary study of task switching and interruptions

    Mary Czerwinski;Eric Horvitz;Susan Wilhite

  • The lumière project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users

    Eric Horvitz;Jack Breese;David Heckerman;David Hovel

  • Inference system and inference engine

    John S Breese;David E Heckerman;Samuel D Hobson;Eric Horvitz

  • Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network

    Jure Leskovec;Eric Horvitz

  • Sensing techniques for mobile interaction

    Ken Hinckley;Jeff Pierce;Mike Sinclair;Eric Horvitz

  • Notification platform architecture

    Eric J. Horvitz;David O. Hovel;Andrew W. Jacobs;Carl M. Kadie

  • Recognizing gestures and using gestures for interacting with software applications

    Joel P. Dehlin;Christina Summer Chen;Andrew D. Wilson;Daniel C. Robbins

  • System and method for resizing an input position indicator for a user interface of a computer system

    Eric J. Horvitz;Michael E. Markley;Martin L. Sonntag

  • Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines

    Samuel J. Gershman;Eric J. Horvitz;Joshua B. Tenenbaum

  • Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems

    Unknown

  • Cyberchondria: Studies of the escalation of medical concerns in Web search

    Ryen W. White;Eric Horvitz

  • Collaborative filtering by personality diagnosis: a hybrid memory- and model-based approach

    David M. Pennock;Eric Horvitz;Steve Lawrence;C. Lee Giles

  • Influence of Pokémon Go on Physical Activity: Study and Implications

    Tim Althoff;Ryen W White;Eric Horvitz

  • Systems and methods for personal ubiquitous information retrieval and reuse

    Susan Dumais;Eric Horvitz;Edward Cutrell;Jonathan Cadiz

  • Predestination: inferring destinations from partial trajectories

    John Krumm;Eric Horvitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryen W. White
Ryen W. White Microsoft (United States)
Ece Kamar
Ece Kamar Microsoft (United States)
David Heckerman
David Heckerman Microsoft (United States)
John Krumm
John Krumm Microsoft (United States)
Susan T. Dumais
Susan T. Dumais Microsoft (United States)
Gary W. Flake
Gary W. Flake Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Ashish Kapoor
Ashish Kapoor Microsoft (United States)
Alexander G. Gounares
Alexander G. Gounares Microsoft (United States)
Lili Cheng
Lili Cheng Microsoft (United States)
Raman K. Sarin
Raman K. Sarin Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science often leads students to consider a range of online degree options. For those seeking a fast entry into the workforce, the best associate degrees can be earned in as little as six months, providing a quick, practical foundation.

Many students interested in technology also look at business or engineering to broaden their career prospects. Enrolling in an online college business degree can open doors to tech management and leadership roles. Similarly, pursuing the cheapest online engineering degree can complement computer science skills with practical engineering knowledge.

Budget and flexibility are key concerns for many learners. That’s why choosing the cheapest online bachelor degree can provide value while still delivering quality education. Whichever path you select, online programs can offer accessibility, affordability, and a wide range of specializations to help launch a successful career in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Horvitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles