World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
75
Citations
20545
World Ranking
746
National Ranking
258

Robert W. Lord publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Lord sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 744 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Robert W. Lord D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Lord sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Computer network
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Operating system

His primary scientific interests are in Multimedia, World Wide Web, Artificial intelligence, Virtual world and Computer vision. His Multimedia course of study focuses on Content and Carry and Data mining. He interconnects Fingerprint and Schema in the investigation of issues within World Wide Web.

The concepts of his Artificial intelligence study are interwoven with issues in Real-time computing, Speech recognition, Resource and Natural language processing. His Virtual world study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Computer security and Implementation. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Event and Computer program.

His most cited work include:

  • Computational user-health testing (278 citations)
  • Real-world incentives offered to virtual world participants (268 citations)
  • Unmanned device interaction methods and systems (247 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Multimedia, Human–computer interaction, World Wide Web, Computer program and Artificial intelligence. His work carried out in the field of Multimedia brings together such families of science as Content and Product. The study of Human–computer interaction is intertwined with the study of User interface in a number of ways.

His work in World Wide Web tackles topics such as Virtual world which are related to areas like Computer security. In his research, Information retrieval is intimately related to Data mining, which falls under the overarching field of Computer program. His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Computer vision and Natural language processing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Multimedia (15.16%)
  • Human–computer interaction (12.18%)
  • World Wide Web (11.53%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?

  • Computer network (10.36%)
  • Wearable computer (3.89%)
  • Subject matter (4.79%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Robert W. Lord spends much of his time researching Computer network, Wearable computer, Subject matter, Human–computer interaction and World Wide Web. His Computer network research includes themes of Wireless, Telecommunications, Database transaction, Wi-Fi array and End user. Robert W. Lord has researched Wearable computer in several fields, including Computer hardware, Mobile device and Gesture.

His research in Human–computer interaction tackles topics such as Electronic circuit which are related to areas like Big data. His work in World Wide Web addresses issues such as Multimedia, which are connected to fields such as Content. The Implementation study combines topics in areas such as Computer security, Database, Data provider and Product.

Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Methods, systems, and devices for handling captured image data that is received by devices (156 citations)
  • Supporting antenna assembly configuration network infrastructure (112 citations)
  • Techniques for processing images (76 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Computer network
  • Operating system
  • Artificial intelligence

Computer network, Subject matter, Computer security, End user and Database transaction are his primary areas of study. He combines subjects such as Wireless, Telecommunications and Embedded system with his study of Computer network. Within one scientific family, Robert W. Lord focuses on topics pertaining to Vendor under Database transaction, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Communication channel and World Wide Web.

His World Wide Web study incorporates themes from Terms of service and Software deployment. His research investigates the connection between User device and topics such as Fingerprint that intersect with problems in Human–computer interaction. His Directional antenna research integrates issues from Artificial intelligence and Computer vision.

Best Publications

  • Unmanned device interaction methods and systems

    Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Virtual world reversion rights

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Computational user-health testing

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Eric C. Leuthardt;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Device pairing via device to device contact

    Alexander J. Cohen;Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Correlating data indicating subjective user states associated with multiple users with data indicating objective occurrences

    Shawn P. Firminger;Jason Garms;Edward K.Y. Jung;Chris D. Karkanias

  • Methods, systems, and devices for handling captured image data that is received by devices

    Pablos Holman;Roderick A. Hyde;Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord

  • Ad-hoc wireless sensor package

    Jesse R. Cheatham;Matthew G. Dyor;Peter N. Glaskowsky;Kimberly D.A. Hallman

  • Capturing selected image objects

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Communicator establishing aspects with context identifying

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Eric C. Leuthardt;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Attribute enhancement in virtual world environments

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Methods and systems for comparing media content

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Eric C. Leuthardt;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Enhanced voice conferencing with history

    Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Nathan P. Myhrvold;Clarence T. Tegreene

  • Involuntary-response-dependent consequences

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Eric C. Leuthardt;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Transmitting aggregated information arising from appnet information

    Alexander J. Cohen;Edward K.Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord

  • Unmanned device utilization methods and systems

    Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Supporting antenna assembly configuration network infrastructure

    Roderick A. Hyde;Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord

  • Real-world profile data for making virtual world contacts

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Shared image devices

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Viewfinder for shared image device

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Speech recognition adaptation systems based on adaptation data

    Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Resolution of virtual world revocable transfers

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Network Acquired Behavioral Fingerprint for Authentication

    Marc E. Davis;Matthew G. Dyor;Daniel A. Gerrity;Xuedong Huang

  • Virtual world interconnection technique

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Manufacturing control system

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark A. Malamud
Mark A. Malamud Microsoft (United States)
Royce A. Levien
Royce A. Levien Fortress Invention
Edward K. Y. Jung
Edward K. Y. Jung Nortel (Canada)
John D. Rinaldo
John D. Rinaldo SEARETE LLC
Richard T. Lord
Richard T. Lord Microsoft (United States)
Clarence T. Tegreene
Clarence T. Tegreene Microsoft (United States)
Roderick A. Hyde
Roderick A. Hyde Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Eric C. Leuthardt
Eric C. Leuthardt Washington University in St. Louis
Charles Whitmer
Charles Whitmer Microsoft (United States)
Victoria Y. H. Wood
Victoria Y. H. Wood Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

There are many ways to expand your career options in Engineering and Technology or pivot into new fields. Online programs provide the flexibility to earn valuable credentials while working or managing other commitments. Increasingly, students are exploring opportunities beyond traditional engineering disciplines, such as management, digital marketing, and legal support roles.

For those interested in the digital world, a social media marketing degree can open doors to fast-growing tech and business roles. Alternatively, those who want to manage operations or services can explore a online hospitality management degree, which covers leadership, guest services, and event planning.

Business-minded students seeking an affordable path toward leadership positions may consider the cheapest online mba aacsb programs for rigorous business training and networking. For those drawn to the legal side of technology or intellectual property, aba approved online paralegal programs offer specialized skills in research, compliance, and contract management.

Exploring these online degrees can help you complement your tech background, adapt to market needs, and discover new career opportunities within or alongside the engineering and technology sector.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Lord

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles