What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary areas of study are Neuroscience, Optogenetics, Channelrhodopsin, Dopamine and Biological neural network.
As part of one scientific family, Karl Deisseroth deals mainly with the area of Neuroscience, narrowing it down to issues related to the Anatomy, and often Basal ganglia.
His research integrates issues of Nucleus accumbens, Stimulation and Inhibitory postsynaptic potential, Excitatory postsynaptic potential in his study of Optogenetics.
His research in Channelrhodopsin focuses on subjects like Biophysics, which are connected to Rhodopsin, CLARITY and Biochemistry.
As part of the same scientific family, Karl Deisseroth usually focuses on Dopamine, concentrating on Anhedonia and intersecting with Functional magnetic resonance imaging.
His studies in Biological neural network integrate themes in fields like Cerebral cortex, Central nucleus of the amygdala, Mammalian brain, Anxiety and Brain activity and meditation.
His most cited work include:
- Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. (3290 citations)
- Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses (1849 citations)
- Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance (1805 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Neuroscience, Optogenetics, Channelrhodopsin, Biological neural network and Stimulation.
His Neuroscience study focuses mostly on Dopamine, Excitatory postsynaptic potential, Inhibitory postsynaptic potential, Neuron and Prefrontal cortex.
His research related to Ventral tegmental area and Dopaminergic might be considered part of Dopamine.
He frequently studies issues relating to Neurotransmission and Excitatory postsynaptic potential.
Karl Deisseroth interconnects Electrophysiology, Nucleus accumbens, Anatomy, Premovement neuronal activity and Opsin in the investigation of issues within Optogenetics.
His Channelrhodopsin research focuses on subjects like Biophysics, which are linked to Ion channel.
He most often published in these fields:
- Neuroscience (83.61%)
- Optogenetics (56.36%)
- Channelrhodopsin (15.16%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Neuroscience (83.61%)
- Optogenetics (56.36%)
- Cell type (7.35%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Neuroscience, Optogenetics, Cell type, Transcriptome and Cell.
His studies deal with areas such as Zebrafish and Calcium imaging as well as Neuroscience.
His study of Channelrhodopsin is a part of Optogenetics.
He has included themes like RNA, Genome, Transcription and Cell biology in his Transcriptome study.
His Cell research incorporates elements of HEK 293 cells, Gene expression and Caenorhabditis elegans.
His studies examine the connections between Biological neural network and genetics, as well as such issues in Intracranial surgery, with regards to Nervous system.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- A Neural Circuit Mechanism for Encoding Aversive Stimuli in the Mesolimbic Dopamine System. (136 citations)
- A Neural Circuit Mechanism for Encoding Aversive Stimuli in the Mesolimbic Dopamine System. (136 citations)
- Cortical layer–specific critical dynamics triggering perception (135 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Karl Deisseroth focuses on Neuroscience, Optogenetics, Dopamine, Premovement neuronal activity and Extramural.
The Neuroscience study combines topics in areas such as Glutamate receptor and Zebrafish.
Channelrhodopsin is the focus of his Optogenetics research.
His Dopamine research includes themes of Midbrain, Glutamatergic and Aversive Stimulus.
His Premovement neuronal activity study combines topics in areas such as Cortex, Opsin, Stimulation and Macaque.
His Neuron study incorporates themes from Thalamic reticular nucleus, Working memory, Prefrontal cortex, Cognition and Coupling.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
