World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
7252
World Ranking
6052
National Ranking
2642

Kevin K. Ohlemiller publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin K. Ohlemiller sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 108 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kevin K. Ohlemiller D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin K. Ohlemiller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin K. Ohlemiller is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their work primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a focus on sensory systems, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, molecular biology, and speech and hearing.

The scientist's research centers on hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, hearing loss and rehabilitation, vestibular and auditory disorders, noise effects and management, immune response and inflammation, planarian biology and electrostimulation, and barrier structure and function studies.

Recent papers authored by Kevin K. Ohlemiller include the following:

  • Macrophages Promote Repair of Inner Hair Cell Ribbon Synapses following Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy (2023), Journal of Neuroscience
  • Cochlear Supporting Cells Require GAS2 for Cytoskeletal Architecture and Hearing (2021), Developmental Cell
  • Estradiol Protects against Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Modulates Auditory Physiology in Female Mice (2021), International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Approaches to Treat Sensorineural Hearing Loss by Hair-Cell Regeneration: The Current State of Therapeutic Developments and Their Potential Impact on Audiological Clinical Practice (2021), Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
  • Programmed Cell Death Recruits Macrophages Into the Developing Mouse Cochlea (2021), Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Ohlemiller include:

  • Mark E. Warchol
  • Tejbeer Kaur
  • Mark A. Rutherford
  • Aizhen Yang-Hood
  • Vikrant Borse

Their publications are found predominantly in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Developmental Cell
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Early elevation of cochlear reactive oxygen species following noise exposure.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;James S. Wright;Laura L. Dugan

  • Targeted deletion of the cytosolic Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase gene (Sod1) increases susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Sandra L. McFadden;Da-Lian Ding;Dorothy G. Flood

  • Analysis of acoustic elements and syntax in communication sounds emitted by mustached bats.

    Jagmeet S. Kanwal;Sumiko Matsumura;Kevin Ohlemiller;Nobuo Suga

  • Targeted mutation of the gene for cellular glutathione peroxidase (Gpx1) increases noise-induced hearing loss in mice.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Sandra L. McFadden;Da-Lian Ding;Patricia M. Lear

  • Contributions of mouse models to understanding of age- and noise-related hearing loss.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller

  • Mechanisms and Genes in Human Strial Presbycusis from Animal Models

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller

  • Activity-dependent transcription regulation of PSD-95 by neuregulin-1 and Eos.

    Jianxin Bao;Hana Lin;Yannan Ouyang;Debin Lei

  • Expression of a truncated Sall1 transcriptional repressor is responsible for Townes–Brocks syndrome birth defects

    Susan McLeskey Kiefer;Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Jing Yang;Bradley W. McDill

  • Age-related hearing loss: the status of Schuknecht's typology.

    Kevin K Ohlemiller

  • Vulnerability to noise-induced hearing loss in 'middle-aged' and young adult mice: a dose-response approach in CBA, C57BL, and BALB inbred strains.

    Kevin K Ohlemiller;James S Wright;Arnold F Heidbreder

  • Divergent Aging Characteristics in CBA/J and CBA/CaJ Mouse Cochleae

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Ashley R. Dahl;Patricia M. Gagnon

  • Fractalkine Signaling Regulates Macrophage Recruitment into the Cochlea and Promotes the Survival of Spiral Ganglion Neurons after Selective Hair Cell Lesion

    Tejbeer Kaur;Darius Zamani;Ling Tong;Edwin W. Rubel

  • Cerebellar Synaptic Defects and Abnormal Motor Behavior in Mice Lacking α- and β-Dystrobrevin

    R. Mark Grady;David F. Wozniak;Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Joshua R. Sanes

  • Cochlear and retinal degeneration in the tubby mouse.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Ruth M. Hughes;Judith Mosinger-Ogilvie;Judith D. Speck

  • Application of Mouse Models to Research in Hearing and Balance

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Sherri M. Jones;Kenneth R. Johnson

  • Age-related loss of spiral ganglion neurons.

    Jianxin Bao;Kevin K. Ohlemiller

  • Biodistribution, Kinetics, and Efficacy of Highly Phosphorylated and Non-phosphorylated β-Glucuronidase in the Murine Model of Mucopolysaccharidosis VII

    Mark S. Sands;Carole A. Vogler;Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Marie S. Roberts

  • Vesicular Glutamatergic Transmission in Noise-Induced Loss and Repair of Cochlear Ribbon Synapses.

    Kyunghee X. Kim;Shelby Payne;Aizhen Yang-Hood;Song-Zhe Li

  • Facilitative responses to species-specific calls in cortical FM-FM neurons of the mustached bat

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Jagmeet S. Kanwal;Nobuo Suga

  • Development of sensory, motor and behavioral deficits in the murine model of Sanfilippo syndrome type B.

    Coy D. Heldermon;Anne K. Hennig;Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Judith M. Ogilvie

  • Cellular correlates of age-related endocochlear potential reduction in a mouse model.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Jaclynn M. Lett;Patricia M. Gagnon

  • Recent findings and emerging questions in cochlear noise injury.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Sands
Mark S. Sands Washington University in St. Louis
Mark E. Warchol
Mark E. Warchol Washington University in St. Louis
Sandra L. McFadden
Sandra L. McFadden University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Erik D. Herzog
Erik D. Herzog Washington University in St. Louis
Richard Salvi
Richard Salvi University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Lorna W. Role
Lorna W. Role Stony Brook University
David F. Dolan
David F. Dolan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Arthur L. Beaudet
Arthur L. Beaudet Baylor College of Medicine
Nobuo Suga
Nobuo Suga Washington University in St. Louis
Jan A. Nolta
Jan A. Nolta University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kevin K. Ohlemiller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles