World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
5701
World Ranking
7926
National Ranking
3405

Mark E. Warchol publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Warchol sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark E. Warchol D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Warchol sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Warchol is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research portfolio spans multiple fields with a primary focus on neuroscience and related disciplines such as biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The scientist's work extensively covers sensory systems, immunology, neurology, cognitive neuroscience, and cell biology.

Their main research topics include hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, and issues related to hearing loss and rehabilitation. Additional focal areas address vestibular and auditory disorders, immune response and inflammation, marine animal studies, Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ, as well as aquaculture disease management and microbiota.

Mark E. Warchol has contributed to a range of publication venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Science Advances
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Collaborative work is an important aspect of their career. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Lavinia Sheets
  • Tejbeer Kaur
  • Angela Schrader
  • Vikrant Borse
  • Kevin K. Ohlemiller

Among their recent publications are the following:

  • Macrophages Promote Repair of Inner Hair Cell Ribbon Synapses following Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy, 2023, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Organ of Corti size is governed by Yap/Tead-mediated progenitor self-renewal, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Macrophage depletion protects against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity, 2024, Science Advances
  • Cisplatin exposure acutely disrupts mitochondrial bioenergetics in the zebrafish lateral-line organ, 2022, Hearing Research
  • Macrophages Respond Rapidly to Ototoxic Injury of Lateral Line Hair Cells but Are Not Required for Hair Cell Regeneration, 2021, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

In addition to journal articles, Mark E. Warchol has authored a book titled Hair Cell Regeneration, published by Springer Nature in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Regenerative proliferation in inner ear sensory epithelia from adult guinea pigs and humans

    Mark E. Warchol;Paul R. Lambert;Bradley J. Goldstein;Andrew Forge

  • Asymmetric Localization of Vangl2 and Fz3 Indicate Novel Mechanisms for Planar Cell Polarity in Mammals

    Mireille Montcouquiol;Mireille Montcouquiol;Nathalie Sans;Nathalie Sans;David Huss;Jacob Kach

  • Neural coding in the chick cochlear nucleus.

    Mark E. Warchol;Peter Dallos

  • The developing organ of Corti contains retinoic acid and forms supernumerary hair cells in response to exogenous retinoic acid in culture

    Matthew W. Kelley;Xiao-Mei Xu;Michael A. Wagner;Mark E. Warchol

  • Auditory Hair Cells: Structure, Function, Development, and Regeneration

    Jeffrey T. Corwin;Mark E. Warchol

  • Inhibition of Caspases Prevents Ototoxic and Ongoing Hair Cell Death

    Jonathan I. Matsui;Judith M. Ogilvie;Mark E. Warchol

  • Regenerative Proliferation in Organ Cultures of the Avian Cochlea: Identification of the Initial Progenitors and Determination of the Latency of the Proliferative Response

    Mark E. Warchol;Jeffrey T. Corwin

  • Fractalkine Signaling Regulates Macrophage Recruitment into the Cochlea and Promotes the Survival of Spiral Ganglion Neurons after Selective Hair Cell Lesion

    Tejbeer Kaur;Darius Zamani;Ling Tong;Edwin W. Rubel

  • Sensory regeneration in the vertebrate inner ear: differences at the levels of cells and species.

    Mark E. Warchol

  • Hair cell regeneration: the identities of progenitor cells, potential triggers and instructive cues.

    Jeffrey T. Corwin;Jay E. Jones;Akiko Katayama;Matthew W. Kelley

  • Critical signaling events during the aminoglycoside‐induced death of sensory hair cells in vitro

    Jonathan I. Matsui;Jonathan E. Gale;Mark E. Warchol

  • Caspase Inhibitors Promote Vestibular Hair Cell Survival and Function after Aminoglycoside Treatment In Vivo

    Jonathan I. Matsui;Asim Haque;David Huss;Elizabeth P. Messana

  • Differentiation of the lateral compartment of the cochlea requires a temporally restricted FGF20 signal

    Sung Ho Huh;Jennifer Jones;Mark E. Warchol;David M. Ornitz

  • Otopetrin 1 is required for otolith formation in the zebrafish Danio rerio.

    Inna Hughes;Brian Blasiole;David Huss;Mark E. Warchol

  • Cellular mechanisms of aminoglycoside ototoxicity.

    Mark E Warchol

  • Cell death, cell proliferation, and estimates of hair cell life spans in the vestibular organs of chicks

    J. Kil;M.E. Warchol;J.T. Corwin

  • Gene expression differences in quiescent versus regenerating hair cells of avian sensory epithelia: implications for human hearing and balance disorders

    R. David Hawkins;Stavros Bashiardes;Cynthia A. Helms;Lydia Hu

  • Overexpression of Bcl-2 prevents neomycin-induced hair cell death and caspase-9 activation in the adult mouse utricle in vitro

    Lisa L. Cunningham;Jonathan I. Matsui;Mark E. Warchol;Edwin W. Rubel

  • The Transcriptome of Utricle Hair Cell Regeneration in the Avian Inner Ear

    Yuan Chieh Ku;Nicole A. Renaud;Rose A. Veile;Cynthia Helms

  • Macrophage activity in organ cultures of the avian cochlea: demonstration of a resident population and recruitment to sites of hair cell lesions.

    Mark E. Warchol

  • Cell Density and N-Cadherin Interactions Regulate Cell Proliferation in the Sensory Epithelia of the Inner Ear

    Mark E. Warchol

  • Selective deletion of cochlear hair cells causes rapid age-dependent changes in spiral ganglion and cochlear nucleus neurons.

    Ling Tong;Melissa K. Strong;Tejbeer Kaur;Jose M. Juiz

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey T. Corwin
Jeffrey T. Corwin University of Virginia
Michael Lovett
Michael Lovett Washington University in St. Louis
David M. Ornitz
David M. Ornitz Washington University in St. Louis
Matthew W. Kelley
Matthew W. Kelley National Institutes of Health
Kevin K. Ohlemiller
Kevin K. Ohlemiller Washington University in St. Louis
Guy P. Richardson
Guy P. Richardson University of Sussex
Mireille Montcouquiol
Mireille Montcouquiol Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Edwin W. Rubel
Edwin W. Rubel University of Washington
J. David Dickman
J. David Dickman Baylor College of Medicine
Andrew Forge
Andrew Forge University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Neuroscience in the USA can offer diverse career options in research, healthcare, technology, and academia. Some neuroscience graduates go on to well-compensated roles in medicine, pharmaceuticals, and data science. To help boost your earning potential, it can be beneficial to compare your pathway to college majors that make the most money.

If affordability or flexibility is important, consider exploring programs from colleges online that accept fafsa. These institutions can make it easier to finance your degree while studying from anywhere.

Supplementing your degree with certifications online can provide a competitive edge in the job market. Certifications in data analysis, psychology, or healthcare may open additional pathways or higher-paying positions.

Not sure if a neuroscience major is right for you? Explore alternative programs through online courses or pursue a broader science-based degree to discover your passion. There are plenty of flexible options to fit your goals and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Warchol

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles