World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
108
Citations
29840
World Ranking
596
National Ranking
336

Edwin W. Rubel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin W. Rubel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 363 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Edwin W. Rubel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin W. Rubel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1990 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Edwin W. Rubel is a researcher affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these disciplines, their research subfields include Sensory Systems, Biophysics, Molecular Biology, Neurology, and Otorhinolaryngology.

The main topics addressed in their research include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, and Genetics, alongside Cell Image Analysis Techniques, Vestibular and Auditory Disorders, Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques, Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior, Ear Surgery and Otitis Media, and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Edwin W. Rubel are Patricia Wu, Julian A. Simon, David W. Raible, Esra D. Camci, and Linus Manubens-Gil.

Publication venues that regularly feature their work include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Methods, Hearing Research, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, and Frontiers in Neurology.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Edwin W. Rubel include:

  • "BigNeuron: a resource to benchmark and predict performance of algorithms for automated tracing of neurons in light microscopy datasets," 2023, Nature Methods
  • "Chloroquine kills hair cells in zebrafish lateral line and murine cochlear cultures: Implications for ototoxicity," 2020, Hearing Research
  • "BigNeuron: A resource to benchmark and predict best-performing algorithms for automated reconstruction of neuronal morphology," 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "An in vivo Biomarker to Characterize Ototoxic Compounds and Novel Protective Therapeutics," 2022, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • "Multiple mechanisms of aminoglycoside ototoxicity are distinguished by subcellular localization of action," 2024, Frontiers in Neurology

Edwin W. Rubel has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), an honor awarded in 1990.

Best Publications

  • Hair cell regeneration after acoustic trauma in adult Coturnix quail.

    Brenda M. Ryals;Edwin W. Rubel

  • AUDITORY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT: Primary Auditory Neurons and Their Targets

    Edwin W. Rubel;Bernd Fritzsch

  • Neomycin-induced hair cell death and rapid regeneration in the lateral line of zebrafish (Danio rerio).

    Julie A. Harris;Alan G. Cheng;Lisa L. Cunningham;Glen MacDonald

  • Gene disruption of p27(Kip1) allows cell proliferation in the postnatal and adult organ of corti.

    Hubert Löwenheim;David N. Furness;Jonathan Kil;Christoph Zinn

  • Ontogeny of Structure and Function in the Vertebrate Auditory System

    Edwin W. Rubel

  • Light microscopic evidence of hair cell regeneration after gentamicin toxicity in chick cochlea.

    Raul M. Cruz;Paul R. Lambert;Edwin W. Rubel

  • Mechanisms of hair cell death and protection.

    Alan G Cheng;Lisa L Cunningham;Edwin W Rubel

  • Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: tonotopic organization of n. magnocellularis and n. laminaris.

    Edwin W. Rubel;Thomas N. Parks

  • Spontaneous hair cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea in vivo

    Brandon C. Cox;Renjie Chai;Renjie Chai;Anne Lenoir;Anne Lenoir;Zhiyong Liu;Zhiyong Liu

  • Notch signaling regulates the extent of hair cell regeneration in the zebrafish lateral line.

    Eva Y. Ma;Edwin W Rubel;David W. Raible

  • Mammalian vestibular hair cell regeneration

    Edwin W Rubel;Leigh Anne Dew;David W. Roberson

  • Effects of unilateral cochlea removal on anteroventral cochlear nucleus neurons in developing gerbils.

    George T. Hashisaki;Edwin W. Rubel;Edwin W. Rubel

  • Afferent Influences on Brain Stem Auditory Nuclei of the Chicken: Neuron Number and Size Following Cochlea Removal

    Donald E. Born;Edwin W. Rubel

  • In vitro analysis of optimal stimuli for phase-locking and time-delayed modulation of firing in avian nucleus laminaris neurons.

    A. D. Reyes;E. W. Rubel;W. J. Spain

  • Afferent regulation of neurons in the brain stem auditory system

    Edwin W. Rubel;Richard L. Hyson;Dianne Durham

  • Membrane properties underlying the firing of neurons in the avian cochlear nucleus

    AD Reyes;EW Rubel;WJ Spain

  • Cell division in the gerbil cochlea after acoustic trauma.

    D. W. Roberson;E. W. Rubel

  • A circuit for coding interaural time differences in the chick brainstem

    Edwin M. Overholt;Edwin W Rubel;Richard L. Hyson

  • Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: presynaptic action potentials regulate protein synthesis in nucleus magnocellularis neurons

    Donald E. Born;Edwin W Rubel

  • Afferent influences on brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: Time course and specificity of dendritic atrophy following deafferentation

    Jeffrey S. Deitch;Edwin W Rubel

Frequent Co-Authors

David W. Raible
David W. Raible University of Washington
Mark Bothwell
Mark Bothwell University of Washington
Eliot A. Brenowitz
Eliot A. Brenowitz University of Washington
Thomas N. Parks
Thomas N. Parks University of Utah
Oswald Steward
Oswald Steward University of California, Irvine
Albert F. Fuchs
Albert F. Fuchs University of Washington
Julie A. Harris
Julie A. Harris University of California, San Francisco
Dan H. Sanes
Dan H. Sanes New York University
Bruce L. Tempel
Bruce L. Tempel University of Washington
Gwenn A. Garden
Gwenn A. Garden University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Edwin W. Rubel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles