World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
86
Citations
24792
World Ranking
1299
National Ranking
657

Richard Salvi publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Salvi sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 495 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard Salvi D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Salvi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Salvi is affiliated with the University at Buffalo, State University of New York in the United States. Their research contributes primarily to the field of neuroscience, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience, sensory systems, neurology, speech and hearing, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, and genetics
  • Hearing loss and rehabilitation
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Noise effects and management
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Multisensory perception and integration

Richard Salvi has published papers in various scientific venues. Their frequent publication locations include:

  • Hearing Research
  • Neurotoxicity Research
  • CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
  • Brain Imaging and Behavior
  • Experimental Gerontology

Among recent publications, several notable papers include:

  • "Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences" (2020) in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Neuroadaptations in the dorsal hippocampus underlie cocaine seeking during prolonged abstinence" (2020) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Novel oral multifunctional antioxidant prevents noise-induced hearing loss and hair cell loss" (2020) in Hearing Research
  • "Review: Neural Mechanisms of Tinnitus and Hyperacusis in Acute Drug-Induced Ototoxicity" (2021) in American Journal of Audiology
  • "Functional magnetic resonance imaging of enhanced central auditory gain and electrophysiological correlates in a behavioral model of hyperacusis" (2020) in Hearing Research

Their work often involves collaboration with frequently coauthoring researchers such as:

  • Dalian Ding
  • Senthilvelan Manohar
  • Guang-Di Chen
  • Yu-Chen Chen
  • Xiaomin Xu

Richard Salvi's scholarly contributions have concentrated extensively on auditory health and related neural mechanisms, with a significant number of publications exploring the biological and neurological aspects of hearing loss, tinnitus, and auditory system disorders. The range of topics and venues reflects a multidisciplinary approach within neuroscience and audiology fields.

Best Publications

  • The functional neuroanatomy of tinnitus : Evidence for limbic system links and neural plasticity

    Alan H. Lockwood;Richard J. Salvi;Mary Lou Coad;M. L. Towsley

  • Auditory plasticity and hyperactivity following cochlear damage.

    Richard J Salvi;Jian Wang;Dalian Ding

  • Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis.

    Benjamin D. Auerbach;Paulo V. Rodrigues;Richard J. Salvi

  • Age-related hearing loss in C57BL/6J mice is mediated by Bak-dependent mitochondrial apoptosis

    Shinichi Someya;Jinze Xu;Kenji Kondo;Dalian Ding

  • Quantitative measures of hair cell loss in CBA and C57BL/6 mice throughout their life spans

    Vlasta P. Spongr;Dorothy G. Flood;Robert D. Frisina;Richard J. Salvi

  • Targeted deletion of the cytosolic Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase gene (Sod1) increases susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.

    Kevin K. Ohlemiller;Sandra L. McFadden;Da-Lian Ding;Dorothy G. Flood

  • Tinnitus and tinnitus disorder: Theoretical and operational definitions (an international multidisciplinary proposal)

    Dirk De Ridder;Winfried Schlee;Sven Vanneste;Alain Londero

  • Salicylate induced tinnitus: Behavioral measures and neural activity in auditory cortex of awake rats

    Guang Yang;Edward Lobarinas;Liyan Zhang;Jeremy Turner

  • Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications.

    James A. Henry;Larry E. Roberts;Donald M. Caspary;Sarah M. Theodoroff

  • Anatomical correlates of impulse noise-induced mechanical damage in the cochlea.

    Roger P. Hamernik;George Turrentine;Michael Roberto;Richard Salvi

  • Insensitivity of the audiogram to carboplatin induced inner hair cell loss in chinchillas

    Edward Lobarinas;Richard Salvi;Dalian Ding

  • Enhanced evoked response amplitudes in the inferior colliculus of the chinchilla following acoustic trauma.

    R.J Salvi;S.S Saunders;M.A Gratton;S Arehole

  • Noise trauma impairs neurogenesis in the rat hippocampus

    Kari Suzanne Kraus;Sucharita Mitra;Zarina Jimenez;Sneha Hinduja

  • Pifithrin-α supresses p53 and protects cochlear and vestibular hair cells from cisplatin-induced apoptosis

    M. Zhang;W. Liu;D. Ding;R. Salvi

  • SALICYLATE INCREASES THE GAIN OF THE CENTRAL AUDITORY SYSTEM

    W. Sun;J. Lu;D. Stolzberg;L. Gray

  • Genetic background effects on age-related hearing loss associated with Cdh23 variants in mice

    Kelly L. Kane;Chantal M. Longo-Guess;Leona H. Gagnon;Dalian Ding

  • Cytotoxic effects of dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) on cochlear organotypic cultures.

    Weidong Qi;Dalian Ding;Richard J. Salvi

  • GAD levels and muscimol binding in rat inferior colliculus following acoustic trauma.

    J.C Milbrandt;T.M Holder;M.C Wilson;R.J Salvi

  • Tinnitus and hyperacusis involve hyperactivity and enhanced connectivity in auditory-limbic-arousal-cerebellar network

    Yu-Chen Chen;Xiaowei Li;Lijie Liu;Jian Wang;Jian Wang

  • The functional anatomy of gaze-evoked tinnitus and sustained lateral gaze

    A.H. Lockwood;D.S. Wack;R.F. Burkard;M.L. Coad

  • Age-related cochlear hair cell loss is enhanced in mice lacking copper/zinc superoxide dismutase

    Sandra L McFadden;Dalian Ding;Andrew G Reaume;Dorothy G Flood

  • Evidence for limbic system links and neural plasticity

    A. H. Lockwood;R. J. Salvi;M. L. Coad;M. L. Towsley

Frequent Co-Authors

Guang-Di Chen
Guang-Di Chen University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Jian Wang
Jian Wang Dalhousie University
Donald Henderson
Donald Henderson University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Sandra L. McFadden
Sandra L. McFadden University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Brian L. Allman
Brian L. Allman University of Western Ontario
Donald M. Caspary
Donald M. Caspary Southern Illinois University School of Medicine
Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
Dirk De Ridder
Dirk De Ridder University of Otago
Robert D. Frisina
Robert D. Frisina University of South Florida
Michal K. Stachowiak
Michal K. Stachowiak University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard Salvi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles