World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
62
Citations
11967
World Ranking
3568
National Ranking
136

Jean-Luc Puel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Luc Puel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 181 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jean-Luc Puel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Luc Puel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean-Luc Puel is affiliated with the University of Montpellier in France and has a research focus primarily within the field of neuroscience. Their work predominantly addresses sensory systems, with notable contributions to cognitive neuroscience, neurology, molecular biology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The scientist's research spans several main topics, including:

  • Hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics
  • Hearing loss and rehabilitation
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Neuroscience and music perception
  • RNA regulation and disease

A selection of recent published papers by Jean-Luc Puel includes:

  • Presbycusis: An Update on Cochlear Mechanisms and Therapies, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • rAAV-Mediated Cochlear Gene Therapy: Prospects and Challenges for Clinical Application, 2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Exacerbated age-related hearing loss in mice lacking the p43 mitochondrial T3 receptor, 2021, BMC Biology
  • Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Gerbil: Round Window Assays of Synapse Loss, 2021, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
  • A spatial code for temporal information is necessary for efficient sensory learning, 2025, Science Advances

The venues where Jean-Luc Puel frequently publishes include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
  • EMC - Otorrinolaringología
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • The Anatomical Record

Frequent collaborators in their research are:

  • Jérôme Bourien
  • Jing Wang
  • Jean-Charles Ceccato
  • Corentin Affortit
  • F. Venail

Best Publications

  • Excitotoxicity and repair of cochlear synapses after noise-trauma induced hearing loss.

    Jean-Luc Puel;Jérôme Ruel;Christine d'Aldin;Rémy Pujol

  • A peptide inhibitor of c-Jun N-terminal kinase protects against both aminoglycoside and acoustic trauma-induced auditory hair cell death and hearing loss.

    J. Wang;T. R. Van De Water;C. Bonny;F. De Ribaupierre

  • Salicylate induces tinnitus through activation of cochlear NMDA receptors

    Matthieu J. Guitton;Jean Caston;Jérôme Ruel;Randolph M. Johnson

  • Chemical synaptic transmission in the cochlea.

    Jean-Luc Puel

  • Excitotoxicity, synaptic repair, and functional recovery in the mammalian cochlea: a review of recent findings.

    Rémy Pujol;Jean-Luc Puel

  • Impairment of SLC17A8 encoding vesicular glutamate transporter-3, VGLUT3, underlies nonsyndromic deafness DFNA25 and inner hair cell dysfunction in null mice.

    Jérôme Ruel;Jérôme Ruel;Sarah Emery;Régis Nouvian;Tiphaine Bersot;Tiphaine Bersot

  • Excitatory amino acid antagonists protect cochlear auditory neurons from excitotoxicity.

    J L Puel;R Pujol;F Tribillac;S Ladrech

  • Pathophysiology of the glutamatergic synapses in the cochlea.

    Pujol R;Puel Jl;Gervais d'Aldin C;Eybalin M

  • Contribution of auditory nerve fibers to compound action potential of the auditory nerve.

    Jérôme Bourien;Yong Tang;Charlène Batrel;Antoine Huet

  • Caspase inhibitors, but not c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase inhibitor treatment, prevent cisplatin-induced hearing loss.

    Jing Wang;Sabine Ladrech;Remy Pujol;Philippe Brabet

  • Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1-F2: evidence that the medial efferent system is involved.

    J.‐L. Puel;G. Rebillard

  • Dopamine inhibition of auditory nerve activity in the adult mammalian cochlea.

    Jérôme Ruel;Régis Nouvian;Christine Gervais D'Aldin;Rémy Pujol

  • Oxidative stress, inflammation, and autophagic stress as the key mechanisms of premature age-related hearing loss in SAMP8 mouse Cochlea.

    Julien Menardo;Yong Tang;Sabine Ladrech;Marc Lenoir

  • Presbycusis: An Update on Cochlear Mechanisms and Therapies.

    Jing Wang;Jean-Luc Puel;Jean-Luc Puel

  • Physiology, pharmacology and plasticity at the inner hair cell synaptic complex.

    Jérôme Ruel;Jing Wang;Jing Wang;Guy Rebillard;Guy Rebillard;Michel Eybalin;Michel Eybalin

  • OPA1 R445H mutation in optic atrophy associated with sensorineural deafness

    Patrizia Amati-Bonneau;Agnès Guichet;Aurélien Olichon;Arnaud Chevrollier

  • Selective attention modifies the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea.

    Jean-Luc Puel;Pierre Bonfils;Rémy Pujol

  • Characteristics of tinnitus and etiology of associated hearing loss: a study of 123 patients.

    Cécile Nicolas-Puel;Ruth Lloyd Faulconbridge;Matthieu Guitton;Jean-Luc Puel

  • Inhibition of the c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase-Mediated Mitochondrial Cell Death Pathway Restores Auditory Function in Sound-Exposed Animals

    Jing Wang;Jérôme Ruel;Sabine Ladrech;Christophe Bonny

  • Salicylate Enables Cochlear Arachidonic-Acid-Sensitive NMDA Receptor Responses

    Jérôme Ruel;Christian Chabbert;Régis Nouvian;Rim Bendris

  • AMPA-preferring glutamate receptors in cochlear physiology of adult guinea-pig

    Jérôme Ruel;Chu Chen;Remy Pujol;Richard Peter Bobbin

Frequent Co-Authors

Rémy Pujol
Rémy Pujol University of Montpellier
Michel Eybalin
Michel Eybalin University of Montpellier
Hamish S. Scott
Hamish S. Scott University of Adelaide
Salah El Mestikawy
Salah El Mestikawy Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Paul Avan
Paul Avan University of Clermont Auvergne
Guy Lenaers
Guy Lenaers University of Angers
Michel Guipponi
Michel Guipponi University of Geneva
Dominique Bonneau
Dominique Bonneau University of Angers

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Luc Puel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles