World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
4863
World Ranking
9436
National Ranking
3384

Paul C. Johnson publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul C. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Paul C. Johnson D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul C. Johnson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul C. Johnson is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research primarily centers around Medicine, with 39 publications in this field. Several subfields are also part of their scholarly focus, including General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Law, Political Science and International Relations, and Infectious Diseases. These subfields reflect the multidisciplinary nature of their investigations.

Their research topics cover diverse areas, including Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, Discrimination and Equality Law, Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics, Amoebic Infections and Treatments, Employment and Welfare Studies, Judicial and Constitutional Studies, and Turfgrass Adaptation and Management.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Paul C. Johnson are:

  • LSE-Lancet Commission on the future of the NHS: re-laying the foundations for an equitable and efficient health and care service after COVID-19, 2021, The Lancet
  • Molecular prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Asia and in Australia, 2021, Journal of Water and Health
  • What is the right level of spending needed for health and care in the UK?, 2021, The Lancet
  • Vitamin D and obesity in adults: a pathophysiological and clinical update, 2020, British Journal of Hospital Medicine
  • Intestinal protozoan and helminthic infections among hemodialysis and cancer patients, 2020, Parasitology Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Johnson include:

  • Paul Sonkin
  • Silvia Falcetta
  • Panagiotis Karanis
  • Milorad M. Novičević
  • Michael Anderson

The scholar frequently publishes in several venues, with multiple publications in:

  • Astronomy & Geophysics
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • The Lancet
  • The European Convention on Human Rights Law Review

Paul C. Johnson has contributed to book publications with notable academic presses. These include:

  • A New Jersey Anthology (2020), published by Rutgers University Press
  • The Enduring Value of Roger Murray (2022), published by Columbia University Press

Best Publications

  • Knowledge for Theory and Practice

    Andrew H. Van De Ven;Paul E. Johnson

  • Heuristic model for predicting the intrusion rate of contaminant vapors into buildings

    Paul C. Johnson;Robert A. Ettinger

  • A Practical Approach to the Design, Operation, and Monitoring of In Situ Soil‐Venting Systems

    P.C. Johnson;C.C. Stanley;M.W. Kemblowski;D.L. Byers

  • Quantitative analysis for the cleanup of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils by in-situ soil venting

    Paul C. Johnson;Marian W. Kemblowski;James D. Colthart

  • An Overview of In Situ Air Sparging

    R.L. Johnson;P.C. Johnson;D.B. McWhorter;R.E. Hinchee

  • Chlorinated Ethene Source Remediation: Lessons Learned

    Hans F. Stroo;Andrea Leeson;Jeffrey A. Marqusee;Paul C. Johnson

  • Field-scale demonstration of enhanced MTBE bioremediation through aquifer bioaugmentation and oxygenation.

    Joseph P. Salanitro;Paul C. Johnson;Gerard E. Spinnler;Paul M. Maner

  • Effect of vapor source-building separation and building construction on soil vapor intrusion as studied with a three-dimensional numerical model.

    Lilian D. V. Abreu;Paul C. Johnson

  • In situ decontamination of spills and landfills by focussed microwave/radio frequency heating and a closed-loop vapor flushing and vacuum recovery system

    Paul C. Johnson;Arthur L. Otermat;Charles C. Chou

  • Simulating the Effect of Aerobic Biodegradation on Soil Vapor Intrusion into Buildings: Influence of Degradation Rate, Source Concentration, and Depth

    Lilian D. V. Abreu;Paul C. Johnson

  • State-of-the-practice review of in situ thermal technologies.

    Jennifer L. Triplett Kingston;Paul R. Dahlen;Paul C. Johnson

  • Source Zone Natural Attenuation at Petroleum Hydrocarbon Spill Sites—II: Application to a Former Oil Field

    Paul D. Lundegard;Paul C. Johnson

  • Assessing the significance of subsurface contaminant vapor migration to enclosed spaces: site-specific alternatives to generic estimates

    Paul C. Johnson;Mariush W. Kemblowski;Richard L. Johnson

  • Assessment of the Contributions of Volatilization and Biodegradation to in Situ Air Sparging Performance

    Paul C. Johnson

  • Source Zone Natural Attenuation at Petroleum Hydrocarbon Spill Sites—I: Site-Specific Assessment Approach

    Paul Johnson;Paul Lundegard;Zhuang Liu

  • Evaluation of the Johnson and Ettinger model for prediction of indoor air quality

    Ian Hers;Reidar Zapf-Gilje;Paul C. Johnson;Loretta Li

  • In-situ thermal desorption of contaminated surface soil

    Paul C. Johnson;David A. Weingaertner

  • Enhanced deep soil vapor extraction process and apparatus for removing contaminants trapped in or below the water table

    Paul C. Johnson;David A. Weingaertner;Lynton W. R. Dicks;Arthur L. Otermat

  • Modeling Vapor Extraction and General Transport in the Presence of NAPL Mixtures and Nonideal Conditions

    David A. Benson;David Huntley;Paul C. Johnson

  • Identification of Alternative Vapor Intrusion Pathways Using Controlled Pressure Testing, Soil Gas Monitoring, and Screening Model Calculations

    Yuanming Guo;Chase Holton;Hong Luo;Hong Luo;Paul Dahlen

  • In-situ soil heating press/vapor extraction system

    Paul C. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard L. Johnson
Richard L. Johnson Oregon Health & Science University
Tadeusz Górecki
Tadeusz Górecki University of Waterloo
Ramon Aravena
Ramon Aravena University of Waterloo
Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown
Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown Arizona State University
Bernard H. Kueper
Bernard H. Kueper Queen's University
Bruce E. Rittmann
Bruce E. Rittmann Arizona State University
Lawrence A. Baker
Lawrence A. Baker University of Minnesota
Loretta Y. Li
Loretta Y. Li University of British Columbia
John T. Wilson
John T. Wilson Environmental Protection Agency
Kurt D. Pennell
Kurt D. Pennell Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various online degree options that complement and expand career opportunities. For those interested in exploring foundational knowledge with flexibility, online best affordable online general studies degree programs provide a broad educational base that can lead to diverse environmental careers.

If you are seeking advanced expertise combined with impactful social engagement, consider the cheapest dsw program available online. This pathway is ideal for professionals aiming to integrate environmental justice and community wellness into their work.

For students looking for a more focused scientific approach, pursuing geology degrees online offers specialized knowledge about earth processes, critical for roles in environmental consulting and natural resource management.

Additionally, those new to higher education or balancing busy lifestyles might prefer programs labeled as easiest bachelor degree options, which provide accessible entry points without compromising essential environmental science concepts.

Best Scientists Citing Paul C. Johnson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles