What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
David H. Petering mostly deals with Biochemistry, Zinc, Metallothionein, Copper and Cytotoxicity.
His Biochemistry study frequently links to related topics such as Molecular biology.
His work carried out in the field of Zinc brings together such families of science as Polymer chemistry and Binding site.
Metallothionein is a primary field of his research addressed under Cadmium.
The various areas that David H. Petering examines in his Copper study include Semicarbazone, Medicinal chemistry, Nuclear chemistry, Chelation and Ligand.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Ehrlich ascites and Stereochemistry.
His most cited work include:
- On the sensitivity of metallothioneins to oxidation during isolation (144 citations)
- Comparative cytotoxic and biochemical effects of ligands and metal complexes of alpha-N-heterocyclic carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazones. (131 citations)
- Direct Reaction of H2O2with Sulfhydryl Groups in HL-60 Cells: Zinc-Metallothionein and Other Sites (127 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of study are Biochemistry, Metallothionein, Zinc, Stereochemistry and Copper.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Biochemistry, Molecular biology are connected with Cell growth and other disciplines.
David H. Petering works mostly in the field of Metallothionein, limiting it down to topics relating to Endocrinology and, in certain cases, Cotransporter.
His studies deal with areas such as Inorganic chemistry, Chelation, Cadmium, Binding site and Metabolism as well as Zinc.
His Stereochemistry research includes themes of Medicinal chemistry, DNA, Reactivity, Cysteine and Metal.
His Copper research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Nuclear chemistry, Ehrlich ascites, Cytotoxicity, Stability constants of complexes and Semicarbazone.
He most often published in these fields:
- Biochemistry (33.98%)
- Metallothionein (27.67%)
- Zinc (23.79%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2019)?
- Biochemistry (33.98%)
- Zinc (23.79%)
- Metallothionein (27.67%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Biochemistry, Zinc, Metallothionein, Proteome and Binding site are his primary areas of study.
Biochemistry connects with themes related to Nitric oxide in his study.
David H. Petering has researched Zinc in several fields, including Quinoline, Inorganic chemistry, Chelation, Size-exclusion chromatography and Adduct.
His Metallothionein study is concerned with the larger field of Cadmium.
His research in Binding site intersects with topics in Plasma protein binding, Metal and Titration.
David H. Petering works mostly in the field of In vitro, limiting it down to topics relating to Stereochemistry and, in certain cases, Sephadex, as a part of the same area of interest.
Between 2008 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Enhanced expressions of sodium-glucose cotransporters in the kidneys of diabetic Zucker rats. (76 citations)
- TSQ (6-Methoxy-8-p-Toluenesulfonamido-Quinoline), a Common Fluorescent Sensor for Cellular Zinc, Images Zinc Proteins (61 citations)
- A fluorescence method for measurement of glucose transport in kidney cells. (60 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Enzyme
- DNA
- Organic chemistry
His primary areas of investigation include Zinc, Proteome, Biochemistry, Adduct and Kidney.
The concepts of his Zinc study are interwoven with issues in Inorganic chemistry, In vitro and Fluorescence microscope.
His research in Proteome intersects with topics in Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, Ethylenediamine, Metal ions in aqueous solution and Electrophoresis.
David H. Petering frequently studies issues relating to Molecular biology and Biochemistry.
David H. Petering interconnects Nuclear chemistry, Chelation, Stereochemistry, Sephadex and In vivo in the investigation of issues within Adduct.
His Kidney study incorporates themes from Lysis and Intracellular.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
