World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernard H. Kueper

Bernard H. Kueper

Bernard H. Kueper publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard H. Kueper sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Bernard H. Kueper D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard H. Kueper sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernard H. Kueper is affiliated with Queen's University in Canada and actively contributes to environmental science and engineering research. Their work spans a range of topics primarily focused on contamination and remediation in groundwater and soil systems.

Key research areas and topics in Kueper's work include:

  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis

Kueper's research fields primarily cover Environmental Science and Engineering, with subfields such as Environmental Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

Frequent publication venues where Kueper has contributed include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
  • Journal of Hydrology

Their recent papers cover remediation techniques using mechanochemical and electrochemical approaches, with notable publications as follows:

  • Mechanochemical remediation of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) amended sand and aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) impacted soil by planetary ball milling, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Use of a horizontal ball mill to remediate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in soil, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Low permeability zone remediation of trichloroethene via coupling electrokinetic migration with in situ electrochemical hydrodechlorination, 2020, Chemosphere
  • Mechanochemical degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in soil using an industrial-scale horizontal ball mill with comparisons of key operational metrics, 2024, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Modelling gas-phase recovery of volatile organic compounds during in situ thermal treatment, 2020, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Kueper has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Kevin G. Mumford, Kent Novakowski, David Patch, Kela P. Weber, and Xiaolong Wu.

In addition to journal articles, Kueper has contributed to book publications under The Groundwater Project eBooks, including titles such as "Flow and Distribution of Non-aqueous Phase Liquids" published in 2022 and a similarly titled book published in 2024.

Best Publications

  • A Field Experiment to Study the Behavior of Tetrachloroethylene Below the Water Table: Spatial Distribution of Residual and Pooled DNAPL

    Bernard H. Kueper;David Redman;Robert C. Starr;Stanley Reitsma

  • Two-phase flow in heterogeneous porous media: 1. Model development

    Bernard H. Kueper;Emil O. Frind

  • Evaluation of cubic law based models describing single-phase flow through a rough-walled fracture

    Julie S. Konzuk;Julie S. Konzuk;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Experimental observations of multiphase flow in heterogeneous porous media

    Bernard H. Kueper;Wesley Abbott;Graham Farquhar

  • Two‐phase flow in heterogeneous porous media: 2. Model application

    Bernard H. Kueper;Emil O. Frind

  • The Behavior of Dense, Nonaqueous Phase Liquids in Fractured Clay and Rock

    Bernard H. Kueper;David B. McWhorter

  • A field experiment to study the behavior of tetrachloroethylene in unsaturated porous media

    Mette M. Poulsen;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Laboratory measurement of capillary pressure‐saturation relationships in a rock fracture

    Stanley Reitsma;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Observed Migration of a Controlled DNAPL Release by Geophysical Methods

    M. L. Brewster;A. P. Annan;J. P. Greenhouse;B. H. Kueper

  • An overview of immiscible fingering in porous media

    Bernard H. Kueper;Emil O. Frind

  • Variability of point source infiltration rates for two‐phase flow in heterogeneous porous media

    Bernard H. Kueper;Jason I. Gerhard

  • Capillary pressure characteristics necessary for simulating DNAPL infiltration, redistribution, and immobilization in saturated porous media

    J. I. Gerhard;J. I. Gerhard;B. H. Kueper

  • Enhanced Solubilization and Destruction of Tetrachloroethylene by Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and Iron

    George O. Bizzigotti;David A. Reynolds;Bernard H. Kueper

  • The Use of Macroscopic Percolation Theory to Construct Large-Scale Capillary Pressure Curves

    Bernard H. Kueper;David B. McWhorter

  • Removal of pooled dense, nonaqueous phase liquid from saturated porous media using upward gradient alcohol floods

    Stuart R. D. Lunn;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Relative permeability characteristics necessary for simulating DNAPL infiltration, redistribution, and immobilization in saturated porous media

    J. I. Gerhard;J. I. Gerhard;B. H. Kueper

  • Numerical Simulation of Surfactant-Enhanced Solubilization of Pooled DNAPL

    Anna R. Mason;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Mechanochemical remediation of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) amended sand and aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) impacted soil by planetary ball milling.

    Lauren P. Turner;Bernard H. Kueper;Kevin M. Jaansalu;David J. Patch

  • Matrix diffusion-derived plume attenuation in fractured bedrock

    David S. Lipson;Bernard H. Kueper;Michael J. Gefell

  • On the Use and Error of Approximation in the Domenico (1987) Solution

    Michael R. West;Bernard H. Kueper;Michael J. Ungs

  • Numerical examination of the factors controlling DNAPL migration through a single fracture.

    David Reynolds;B.H. Kueper

  • The use of upward gradients to arrest downward dense, nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) migration in the presence of solubilizing surfactants

    Bettina L. Longino;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Concentration rebound following in situ chemical oxidation in fractured clay.

    Keely Mundle;David A. Reynolds;Michael R. West;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Influence of constitutive model parameters on the predicted migration of DNAPL in heterogeneous porous media

    J. I. Gerhard;J. I. Gerhard;B. H. Kueper

  • Time Scales of DNAPL Migration in Sandy Aquifers Examined via Numerical Simulation

    Jason I. Gerhard;TiWee Pang;Bernard H. Kueper

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason I. Gerhard
Jason I. Gerhard University of Western Ontario
Emil O. Frind
Emil O. Frind University of Waterloo
Brent E. Sleep
Brent E. Sleep University of Toronto
Paul C. Johnson
Paul C. Johnson Arizona State University
Ronald W. Falta
Ronald W. Falta Clemson University
John T. Wilson
John T. Wilson Environmental Protection Agency
Fang Zhang
Fang Zhang Tsinghua University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career pathways. For students who may be balancing other commitments, exploring military friendly online Spanish degree programs can provide valuable language skills that complement Earth Science expertise, especially in roles involving international research or environmental policy.

Creative professionals interested in blending art and science might consider programs like online MFA visual arts. This unique skill set is useful in scientific visualization and educational content development within Earth Sciences.

For those aiming to advance into leadership or administrative roles in environmental organizations, the best online master degree in human resource management offers essential training to manage teams and projects effectively.

Finally, if time is a critical factor, especially for older students or career changers, exploring a one year degree for seniors can be a practical way to quickly earn credentials that enhance your Earth Science career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard H. Kueper

Trending Scientists