World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernard H. Kueper

Bernard H. Kueper

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 30 9064 8427 458 420 84 4284

Bernard H. Kueper publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bernard H. Kueper between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bernard H. Kueper published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2014. 5 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2014. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1988 2025

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bernard H. Kueper: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 3
1992 3
1993 1
1994 1
1995 3
1996 4
1997 3
1998 3
1999 4
2000 0
2001 2
2002 0
2003 0
2004 4
2005 2
2006 0
2007 5
2008 4
2009 4
2010 2
2011 1
2012 3
2013 2
2014 11
2015 0
2016 3
2017 2
2018 4
2019 3
2020 2
2021 2
2022 8
2023 7
2024 3
2025 2
Total 103
Download as CSV

Bernard H. Kueper publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard H. Kueper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 84 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278 84
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Bernard H. Kueper D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard H. Kueper sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144 30
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bernard H. Kueper is affiliated with Queen's University in Canada and actively contributes to environmental science and engineering research. Their work spans a range of topics primarily focused on contamination and remediation in groundwater and soil systems.

Key research areas and topics in Kueper's work include:

  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis

Kueper's research fields primarily cover Environmental Science and Engineering, with subfields such as Environmental Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

Frequent publication venues where Kueper has contributed include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
  • Journal of Hydrology

Their recent papers cover remediation techniques using mechanochemical and electrochemical approaches, with notable publications as follows:

  • Mechanochemical remediation of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) amended sand and aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) impacted soil by planetary ball milling, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Use of a horizontal ball mill to remediate per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in soil, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Low permeability zone remediation of trichloroethene via coupling electrokinetic migration with in situ electrochemical hydrodechlorination, 2020, Chemosphere
  • Mechanochemical degradation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in soil using an industrial-scale horizontal ball mill with comparisons of key operational metrics, 2024, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Modelling gas-phase recovery of volatile organic compounds during in situ thermal treatment, 2020, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Kueper has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Kevin G. Mumford, Kent Novakowski, David Patch, Kela P. Weber, and Xiaolong Wu.

In addition to journal articles, Kueper has contributed to book publications under The Groundwater Project eBooks, including titles such as "Flow and Distribution of Non-aqueous Phase Liquids" published in 2022 and a similarly titled book published in 2024.

Best Publications

  • A Field Experiment to Study the Behavior of Tetrachloroethylene Below the Water Table: Spatial Distribution of Residual and Pooled DNAPL

    Bernard H. Kueper;David Redman;Robert C. Starr;Stanley Reitsma

  • Two-phase flow in heterogeneous porous media: 1. Model development

    Bernard H. Kueper;Emil O. Frind

  • Evaluation of cubic law based models describing single-phase flow through a rough-walled fracture

    Julie S. Konzuk;Julie S. Konzuk;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Experimental observations of multiphase flow in heterogeneous porous media

    Bernard H. Kueper;Wesley Abbott;Graham Farquhar

  • Two‐phase flow in heterogeneous porous media: 2. Model application

    Bernard H. Kueper;Emil O. Frind

  • The Behavior of Dense, Nonaqueous Phase Liquids in Fractured Clay and Rock

    Bernard H. Kueper;David B. McWhorter

  • A field experiment to study the behavior of tetrachloroethylene in unsaturated porous media

    Mette M. Poulsen;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Laboratory measurement of capillary pressure‐saturation relationships in a rock fracture

    Stanley Reitsma;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Observed Migration of a Controlled DNAPL Release by Geophysical Methods

    M. L. Brewster;A. P. Annan;J. P. Greenhouse;B. H. Kueper

  • An overview of immiscible fingering in porous media

    Bernard H. Kueper;Emil O. Frind

  • Variability of point source infiltration rates for two‐phase flow in heterogeneous porous media

    Bernard H. Kueper;Jason I. Gerhard

  • Capillary pressure characteristics necessary for simulating DNAPL infiltration, redistribution, and immobilization in saturated porous media

    J. I. Gerhard;J. I. Gerhard;B. H. Kueper

  • Enhanced Solubilization and Destruction of Tetrachloroethylene by Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and Iron

    George O. Bizzigotti;David A. Reynolds;Bernard H. Kueper

  • The Use of Macroscopic Percolation Theory to Construct Large-Scale Capillary Pressure Curves

    Bernard H. Kueper;David B. McWhorter

  • Removal of pooled dense, nonaqueous phase liquid from saturated porous media using upward gradient alcohol floods

    Stuart R. D. Lunn;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Relative permeability characteristics necessary for simulating DNAPL infiltration, redistribution, and immobilization in saturated porous media

    J. I. Gerhard;J. I. Gerhard;B. H. Kueper

  • Numerical Simulation of Surfactant-Enhanced Solubilization of Pooled DNAPL

    Anna R. Mason;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Mechanochemical remediation of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) amended sand and aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) impacted soil by planetary ball milling.

    Lauren P. Turner;Bernard H. Kueper;Kevin M. Jaansalu;David J. Patch

  • Matrix diffusion-derived plume attenuation in fractured bedrock

    David S. Lipson;Bernard H. Kueper;Michael J. Gefell

  • On the Use and Error of Approximation in the Domenico (1987) Solution

    Michael R. West;Bernard H. Kueper;Michael J. Ungs

  • Numerical examination of the factors controlling DNAPL migration through a single fracture.

    David Reynolds;B.H. Kueper

  • The use of upward gradients to arrest downward dense, nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) migration in the presence of solubilizing surfactants

    Bettina L. Longino;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Concentration rebound following in situ chemical oxidation in fractured clay.

    Keely Mundle;David A. Reynolds;Michael R. West;Bernard H. Kueper

  • Influence of constitutive model parameters on the predicted migration of DNAPL in heterogeneous porous media

    J. I. Gerhard;J. I. Gerhard;B. H. Kueper

  • Time Scales of DNAPL Migration in Sandy Aquifers Examined via Numerical Simulation

    Jason I. Gerhard;TiWee Pang;Bernard H. Kueper

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason I. Gerhard
Jason I. Gerhard University of Western Ontario
Emil O. Frind
Emil O. Frind University of Waterloo
Brent E. Sleep
Brent E. Sleep University of Toronto
Paul C. Johnson
Paul C. Johnson Arizona State University
Ronald W. Falta
Ronald W. Falta Clemson University
John T. Wilson
John T. Wilson Environmental Protection Agency
Fang Zhang
Fang Zhang Tsinghua University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career pathways. For students who may be balancing other commitments, exploring military friendly online Spanish degree programs can provide valuable language skills that complement Earth Science expertise, especially in roles involving international research or environmental policy.

Creative professionals interested in blending art and science might consider programs like online MFA visual arts. This unique skill set is useful in scientific visualization and educational content development within Earth Sciences.

For those aiming to advance into leadership or administrative roles in environmental organizations, the best online master degree in human resource management offers essential training to manage teams and projects effectively.

Finally, if time is a critical factor, especially for older students or career changers, exploring a one year degree for seniors can be a practical way to quickly earn credentials that enhance your Earth Science career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard H. Kueper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles