World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Beth L. Parker

Beth L. Parker

Beth L. Parker publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth L. Parker sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Beth L. Parker D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beth L. Parker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beth L. Parker is affiliated with the University of Guelph in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, engineering, and earth and planetary sciences, with a significant emphasis on environmental engineering and geochemistry and petrology as subfields. The scientist's work covers various specialized topics within these areas.

Their main research topics include:

  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Groundwater and isotope geochemistry
  • Hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Geophysical and geoelectrical methods
  • Seismic imaging and inversion techniques
  • Geophysical methods and applications

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Integrated modelling to assess climate change impacts on groundwater and surface water in the Great Lakes Basin using diverse climate forcing" (2020), published in Journal of Hydrology
  • "Measuring Fracture Flow Changes in a Bedrock Aquifer Due to Open Hole and Pumped Conditions Using Active Distributed Temperature Sensing" (2020), published in Water Resources Research
  • "Groundwater nitrate in three distinct hydrogeologic and land-use settings in southwestern Ontario, Canada" (2020), published in Hydrogeology Journal
  • "Delineating aquitard characteristics within a Silurian dolostone aquifer using high-density hydraulic head and fracture datasets" (2024), published in Hydrogeology Journal
  • "Biotic and abiotic reductive dechlorination of chloroethenes in aquitards" (2021), published in The Science of The Total Environment

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Beth L. Parker include:

  • Emmanuelle Arnaud
  • Colby M. Steelman
  • Jessica Meyer
  • Jonathan Munn
  • Oliver Conway-White

Their publications have appeared predominantly in venues such as:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Journal of Hydrology
  • Hydrogeology Journal
  • Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
  • Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation

In addition to journal articles, Beth L. Parker has contributed to book publications. One noted book is titled "Fractures and Faults in Sandstone and Sandstone-Shale/Mudstone Sequences and Their Impact on Groundwater," published in 2022 by The Groundwater Project eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Plume persistence due to aquitard back diffusion following dense nonaqueous phase liquid source removal or isolation

    Steven W. Chapman;Beth L. Parker

  • Diffusive Disappearance of Immiscible‐Phase Organic Liquids in Fractured Geologic Media

    Beth L. Parker;Robert W. Gillham;John A. Cherry

  • Plume persistence caused by back diffusion from thin clay layers in a sand aquifer following TCE source-zone hydraulic isolation.

    Beth L. Parker;Steven W. Chapman;Martin A. Guilbeault

  • Field study of TCE diffusion profiles below DNAPL to assess aquitard integrity.

    Beth L. Parker;John A. Cherry;Steven W. Chapman

  • Mass and Flux Distributions from DNAPL Zones in Sandy Aquifers

    Martin A. Guilbeault;Beth L. Parker;John A. Cherry

  • Human Enteric Viruses in Groundwater from a Confined Bedrock Aquifer

    Mark A Borchardt;Kenneth R Bradbury;Madeline B Gotkowitz;John A Cherry

  • Field-scale evaluation of the passive flux meter for simultaneous measurement of groundwater and contaminant fluxes.

    Michael D. Annable;Kirk Hatfield;Jaehyun Cho;Harald Klammler

  • Mobility and persistence of methane in groundwater in a controlled-release field experiment

    Aaron G. Cahill;Aaron G. Cahill;Colby M. Steelman;Olenka Forde;Olukayode Kuloyo

  • Effect of source variability and transport processes on carbon isotope ratios of TCE and PCE in two sandy aquifers

    Daniel Hunkeler;N Chollet;X. Pittet;R Aravena

  • A New Depth-Discrete Multilevel Monitoring Approach for Fractured Rock

    John A. Cherry;Beth L. Parker;Carl Keller

  • Testing high resolution numerical models for analysis of contaminant storage and release from low permeability zones

    Steven W. Chapman;Beth L. Parker;Tom C. Sale;Lee Ann Doner

  • Using earth-tide induced water pressure changes to measure in situ permeability: A comparison with long-term pumping tests

    Vincent Allègre;Emily E. Brodsky;Lian Xue;Stephanie M. Nale

  • Groundwater-surface water interaction and its role on TCE groundwater plume attenuation.

    Steven W. Chapman;Beth L. Parker;John A. Cherry;Ramon Aravena

  • Quantification of non‐Darcian flow observed during packer testing in fractured sedimentary rock

    Patryk M. Quinn;John A. Cherry;Beth L. Parker

  • Review and Analysis of Chlorinated Solvent Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Distributions in Five Sandy Aquifers

    B. L. Parker;J. A. Cherry;S. W. Chapman;M. A. Guilbeault

  • Vertical cross contamination of trichloroethylene in a borehole in fractured sandstone.

    S.N. Sterling;B.L. Parker;J.A. Cherry;J.H. Williams

  • Diffusive Loss of Non‐Aqueous Phase Organic Solvents from Idealized Fracture Networks in Geologic Media

    Beth L. Parker;David B. McWhorter;John A. Cherry

  • Characterization of a heterogeneous DNAPL source zone in the Borden aquifer using partitioning and interfacial tracers: Residual morphologies and background sorption

    Niels Hartog;Jaehyun Cho;Beth L. Parker;Michael D. Annable

  • Evaluating the fate of chlorinated ethenes in streambed sediments by combining stable isotope, geochemical and microbial methods

    Yumiko Abe;Ramon Aravena;Jakob Zopfi;Beth Parker

  • Geochemical reactions resulting from in situ oxidation of PCE-DNAPL by KMnO4 in a sandy aquifer.

    Matthew D. Nelson;Beth L. Parker;Tom A. Al;John A. Cherry

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Cherry
John A. Cherry University of Guelph
Ramon Aravena
Ramon Aravena University of Waterloo
Lee Slater
Lee Slater Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Bernhard Mayer
Bernhard Mayer University of Calgary
Kari E. Dunfield
Kari E. Dunfield University of Guelph
Daniel Hunkeler
Daniel Hunkeler University of Neuchâtel
Michael D. Annable
Michael D. Annable University of Florida
Ivonne Nijenhuis
Ivonne Nijenhuis Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Richard T. Wilkin
Richard T. Wilkin Environmental Protection Agency
Christopher R. Clarkson
Christopher R. Clarkson University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to a variety of career paths, many of which can be enhanced with advanced degrees pursued online. For example, professionals interested in organizational leadership and workforce management might explore online masters programs in human resource management. These programs equip students with skills to manage teams and projects effectively, which is valuable in scientific organizations.

Older adults looking to change careers or expand their knowledge can find flexible options through degrees for older adults. This demographic benefits from programs that allow paced learning without sacrificing quality or access to essential resources.

Those fascinated by information organization and research methodologies might consider degrees related to library science. Investigating the value of a degree, resources like is a library science degree worth it provide important insights into career prospects. Additionally, finding accredited programs is key to success, with ala accredited mls programs offering reputable pathways for students seeking to specialize in this growing field.

Exploring these related fields through online education can complement an Earth Science background and broaden career opportunities in research, education, management, and information science.

Best Scientists Citing Beth L. Parker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles