World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
53
Citations
9001
World Ranking
2913
National Ranking
78

Daniel Hunkeler publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Hunkeler sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 194 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Daniel Hunkeler D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Hunkeler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Hunkeler is affiliated with the University of Neuchâtel in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on several subfields including Environmental Engineering, Geochemistry and Petrology, Global and Planetary Change, Pollution, and Water Science and Technology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Radioactive contamination and transfer

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Philip Brunner
  • Rolf Kipfer
  • Fabien Cochand
  • Morgan Peel
  • Oliver S. Schilling

Daniel Hunkeler has published extensively in various scientific journals. Frequent publication venues are:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Journal of Chromatography A
  • Water Research
  • HydroShare Resources

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Influence of surface water - groundwater interactions on the spatial distribution of pesticide metabolites in groundwater, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Low-flow behavior of alpine catchments with varying quaternary cover under current and future climatic conditions, 2020, Journal of Hydrology
  • A Framework for Untangling Transient Groundwater Mixing and Travel Times, 2021, Water Resources Research
  • Perspectives of compound-specific isotope analysis of organic contaminants for assessing environmental fate and managing chemical pollution, 2024, Nature Water
  • Triple-Element Compound-Specific Stable Isotope Analysis (3D-CSIA): Added Value of Cl Isotope Ratios to Assess Herbicide Degradation, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology

Best Publications

  • Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications

    G Rebitzer;Tomas Ekvall;R Frischknecht;D Hunkeler

  • A new concept linking observable stable isotope fractionation to transformation pathways of organic pollutants.

    Martin Elsner;Luc Zwank;Daniel Hunkeler;René P. Schwarzenbach

  • Monitoring Microbial Dechlorination of Tetrachloroethene (PCE) in Groundwater Using Compound-Specific Stable Carbon Isotope Ratios: Microcosm and Field Studies

    Daniel Hunkeler;R Aravena;B.J Butler

  • Carbon Isotope Fractionation during Microbial Dechlorination of Trichloroethene, cis-1,2-Dichloroethene, and Vinyl Chloride: Implications for Assessment of Natural Attenuation

    Y Bloom;R Aravena;Daniel Hunkeler;E Edwards

  • Current challenges in compound-specific stable isotope analysis of environmental organic contaminants

    Martin Elsner;Maik A. Jochmann;Thomas B. Hofstetter;Daniel Hunkeler

  • Review : Microbial biocenoses in pristine aquifers and an assessment of investigative methods

    Nicola Goldscheider;Daniel Hunkeler;Pierre Rossi

  • Environmental Isotopes in Biodegradation and Bioremediation

    C Aelion;Patrick Höhener;Daniel Hunkeler;Ramon Aravena

  • Hydrogen and carbon isotope fractionation during aerobic biodegradation of benzene.

    D Hunkeler;N Andersen;R Aravena;S M Bernasconi

  • Carbon and chlorine isotope fractionation during aerobic oxidation and reductive dechlorination of vinyl chloride and cis-1,2-dichloroethene

    Yumiko Abe;Ramon Aravena;Jakob Zopfi;O Shouakar-Stash

  • Does the Rayleigh equation apply to evaluate field isotope data in contaminant hydrogeology

    Yumiko Abe;Daniel Hunkeler

  • Monitoring Biodegradation of Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) Using Compound-Specific Carbon Isotope Analysis

    Daniel Hunkeler;B.J Butler;R Aravena;J.F Barker

  • Review: From multi-scale conceptualization to a classification system for inland groundwater-dependent ecosystems

    Guillaume Bertrand;Nico Goldscheider;Jean-Michel Gobat;Daniel Hunkeler

  • Assessment of degradation pathways in an aquifer with mixed chlorinated hydrocarbon contamination using stable isotope analysis.

    Daniel Hunkeler;Ramon Aravena;Karen Berry-Spark;Evan Cox

  • Determination of Compound-Specific Carbon Isotope Ratios of Chlorinated Methanes, Ethanes, and Ethenes in Aqueous Samples

    Daniel Hunkeler;Ramon Aravena

  • Compound-specific chlorine isotope analysis: a comparison of gas chromatography/isotope ratio mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/quadrupole mass spectrometry methods in an interlaboratory study.

    Anat Bernstein;Orfan Shouakar-Stash;Karin Ebert;Christine Laskov

  • Effect of source variability and transport processes on carbon isotope ratios of TCE and PCE in two sandy aquifers

    Daniel Hunkeler;N Chollet;X. Pittet;R Aravena

  • Carbon isotopes as a tool to evaluate the origin and fate of vinyl chloride: laboratory experiments and modeling of isotope evolution.

    Daniel Hunkeler;Ramon Aravena;Evan Cox

  • Groundwater-surface water interaction and its role on TCE groundwater plume attenuation.

    Steven W. Chapman;Beth L. Parker;John A. Cherry;Ramon Aravena

  • Quantification of Sequential Chlorinated Ethene Degradation by Use of a Reactive Transport Model Incorporating Isotope Fractionation

    Boris M. Van Breukelen;Daniel Hunkeler;Frank Volkering

  • 222Rn as a Partitioning Tracer To Detect Diesel Fuel Contamination in Aquifers: Laboratory Study and Field Observations

    Daniel Hunkeler;Eduard Hoehn;Patrick Höhener;Josef Zeyer

  • Determination of spatiotemporal variability of tree water uptake using stable isotopes (δ18O, δ2H) in an alluvial system supplied by a high‐altitude watershed, Pfyn forest, Switzerland

    Guillaume Bertrand;Jean Masini;Nico Goldscheider;Jessica Meeks

  • Intrinsic bioremediation of a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer and assessment of mineralization based on stable carbon isotopes.

    Christof Bolliger;Patrick Höhener;Daniel Hunkeler;Katharina Häberli

  • Groundwater Storage in High Alpine Catchments and Its Contribution to Streamflow

    M. Cochand;P. Christe;P. Ornstein;D. Hunkeler

Frequent Co-Authors

Ramon Aravena
Ramon Aravena University of Waterloo
Martin Elsner
Martin Elsner Technical University of Munich
Patrick Höhener
Patrick Höhener Aix-Marseille University
Philip Brunner
Philip Brunner University of Neuchâtel
Poul Løgstrup Bjerg
Poul Løgstrup Bjerg Technical University of Denmark
Carsten S. Jacobsen
Carsten S. Jacobsen Aarhus University
Josef Zeyer
Josef Zeyer ETH Zurich
Thomas B. Hofstetter
Thomas B. Hofstetter Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Philip John Binning
Philip John Binning Technical University of Denmark
Albert Soler
Albert Soler University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA offers diverse career opportunities, but many students also explore complementary fields to broaden their prospects. For example, professionals interested in managing teams and organizational dynamics may consider pursuing an online masters in human resource management. This degree equips graduates with skills in talent acquisition and employee relations, valuable in scientific organizations and environmental firms.

Additionally, education and career advancement are accessible to learners of all ages. Resources like college degrees for seniors highlight programs tailored for mature students seeking flexible online options, allowing experienced professionals to re-skill or upskill alongside their commitments.

For those drawn to information science, exploring an online degree such as the mlis ala accredited programs can be beneficial. These programs prepare students for careers in managing scientific research data or library resources within academic and government institutions.

Considering the value of such degrees is important. Many students ask, is a masters in library science worth it? In the context of Earth Science, this degree often opens doors to unique roles intersecting environmental research and information management, enhancing interdisciplinary career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Hunkeler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles