World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
34018
World Ranking
9659
National Ranking
4973

Steven E. Wolf publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven E. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 623 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steven E. Wolf D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven E. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven E. Wolf is affiliated with The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston in the United States. Their research activity centers predominantly in the field of Medicine, with a considerable focus on subfields such as Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Surgery.

The main topics addressed in their work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes, Wound Healing and Treatments, Injury Epidemiology and Prevention, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Trauma and Emergency Care Studies, Disaster Response and Management, and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management. These areas reflect a broad involvement in clinical and public health concerns related to burn care and emergency medical conditions.

Several recent publications illustrate the scope of their scholarly contributions:

  • A Narrative Review of the History of Skin Grafting in Burn Care, 2021, Medicina
  • Role of Exosomes in Dermal Wound Healing: A Systematic Review, 2021, Journal of Investigative Dermatology
  • Detection of Infection and Sepsis in Burns, 2020, Surgical Infections
  • Porcine Xenograft and Epidermal Fully Synthetic Skin Substitutes in the Treatment of Partial-Thickness Burns: A Literature Review, 2021, Medicina
  • Inhalation injury is associated with long-term employment outcomes in the burn population: Findings from a cross-sectional examination of the Burn Model System National Database, 2020, PLoS ONE

Steven E. Wolf collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Juquan Song, Amina El Ayadi, George Golovko, Barclay T. Stewart, and Alen Palackic. These collaborations represent sustained partnerships contributing to a diverse research output.

Their work is often published in venues specialized in burn care and surgical research such as the Journal of Burn Care & Research, where they have 89 publications, as well as Burns, Medicina, The American Journal of Surgery, and the American Journal of Kidney Diseases. This indicates a consistent publication record in journals concerned with clinical and translational aspects of burn injury and surgical care.

Best Publications

  • Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans

    Stuart M Phillips;Kevin Tipton;Asle A Aarsland;Steven E Wolf

  • Timing of amino acid-carbohydrate ingestion alters anabolic response of muscle to resistance exercise

    Kevin D. Tipton;Kevin D. Tipton;Blake B. Rasmussen;Blake B. Rasmussen;Sharon L. Miller;Sharon L. Miller;Steven E. Wolf

  • An oral essential amino acid-carbohydrate supplement enhances muscle protein anabolism after resistance exercise

    Blake B. Rasmussen;Kevin D. Tipton;Sharon L. Miller;Steven E. Wolf

  • American Burn Association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns

    David G. Greenhalgh;Jeffrey R. Saffle;James H. Holmes;Richard L. Gamelli

  • Essential amino acids and muscle protein recovery from resistance exercise

    Elisabet Børsheim;Kevin D. Tipton;Steven E. Wolf;Robert R. Wolfe

  • Reversal of catabolism by beta-blockade after severe burns.

    David N. Herndon;David W. Hart;Steven E. Wolf;David L. Chinkes

  • Association of hyperglycemia with increased mortality after severe burn injury.

    Dennis C. Gore;David Chinkes;John Heggers;David N. Herndon

  • Amino acid ingestion improves muscle protein synthesis in the young and elderly

    Douglas Paddon-Jones;Melinda Sheffield-Moore;Xiao Jun Zhang;Elena Volpi

  • Ingestion of casein and whey proteins result in muscle anabolism after resistance exercise

    Kevin D. Tipton;Tabatha A. Elliott;Melanie G. Cree;Steven E. Wolf

  • Persistence of muscle catabolism after severe burn

    D. W. Hart;Steven Wolf;R. Mlcak;D. L. Chinkes

  • Oral amino acids stimulate muscle protein anabolism in the elderly despite higher first-pass splanchnic extraction

    Elena Volpi;Bettina Mittendorfer;Steven E. Wolf;Robert R. Wolfe;Robert R. Wolfe

  • Safety and benefit of discontinuing statin therapy in the setting of advanced, life-limiting illness a randomized clinical trial

    Jean S. Kutner;Patrick J. Blatchford;Donald H. Taylor;Christine S. Ritchie;Christine S. Ritchie

  • The ratio of fibrinogen to red cells transfused affects survival in casualties receiving massive transfusions at an army combat support hospital.

    Harry K. Stinger;Philip C. Spinella;Jeremy G. Perkins;Kurt W. Grathwohl

  • Mortality Determinants in Massive Pediatric Burns: An Analysis of 103 Children with ≥80% TBSA Burns (≥70% Full-Thickness)

    Steven Wolf;J. Rose;Manubhai Desai;Joan Mileski

  • Independent and combined effects of amino acids and glucose after resistance exercise.

    Sharon L. Miller;Kevin D. Tipton;David L. Chinkes;Steven E. Wolf

  • Determinants of skeletal muscle catabolism after severe burn.

    David W. Hart;Steven E. Wolf;David L. Chinkes;Dennis C. Gore

  • Thromboelastography as a better indicator of hypercoagulable state after injury than prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time.

    Myung S. Park;Myung S. Park;Wenjun Z. Martini;Michael A. Dubick;Jose Salinas

  • A multicenter review of toxic epidermal necrolysis treated in U.S. burn centers at the end of the twentieth century.

    Tina L. Palmieri;D. G. Greenhalgh;J. R. Saffle;R. J. Spence

  • Acute Response of Net Muscle Protein Balance Reflects 24-h Balance After Exercise and Amino Acid Ingestion

    Kevin D. Tipton;Kevin D. Tipton;Elisabet Borsheim;Elisabet Borsheim;Steven E. Wolf;Steven E. Wolf;Arthur P. Sanford;Arthur P. Sanford

  • ESSENTIAL AMINO ACIDS AND MUSCLE PROTEIN RECOVERY FROM RESISTANCE EXERCISE

    K D. Tipton;S E. Wolf;R R. Wolfe

Frequent Co-Authors

David N. Herndon
David N. Herndon The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Charles E. Wade
Charles E. Wade The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
John B. Holcomb
John B. Holcomb University of Alabama at Birmingham
Robert R. Wolfe
Robert R. Wolfe University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Duane R. Hospenthal
Duane R. Hospenthal San Antonio Military Medical Center
Clinton K. Murray
Clinton K. Murray San Antonio Military Medical Center
Nicole S. Gibran
Nicole S. Gibran University of Washington
Karen J. Brasel
Karen J. Brasel Medical College of Wisconsin
Kenji Inaba
Kenji Inaba University of Southern California
Richard L. Gamelli
Richard L. Gamelli Loyola University Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in healthcare goes beyond traditional medicine. Many students are attracted to flexible, cost-effective programs that prepare them for patient care, leadership, or advanced research roles.

Nursing school online has become a popular alternative, allowing students to balance work and study while pursuing their passion for health care. For registered nurses wanting to advance, comparing rn to bsn online cost can help identify affordable options to earn a bachelor’s degree.

Those interested in advanced nursing research and leadership might consider an online phd nursing program. Meanwhile, individuals from non-nursing backgrounds can take advantage of online direct entry msn programs, which offer a fast track into nursing practice and management roles.

These online pathways provide flexibility and open up diverse career routes in the healthcare field, supporting both new and experienced professionals in advancing their medical careers.

Best Scientists Citing Steven E. Wolf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles