World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 116 4308 4038 2352 2177 788 58383

Charles E. Wade publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles E. Wade between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles E. Wade published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 16.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 59 publications in 2011. 12 of the 853 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 59. Peak 59 publications in 2011. 1976: 3 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 4 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 15 publications 1990: 19 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 37 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 59 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 48 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1976 2026

853 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles E. Wade: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 3
1977 4
1978 1
1979 2
1980 1
1981 4
1982 8
1983 7
1984 5
1985 5
1986 8
1987 5
1988 7
1989 15
1990 19
1991 14
1992 13
1993 6
1994 10
1995 7
1996 13
1997 10
1998 8
1999 11
2000 15
2001 13
2002 18
2003 10
2004 4
2005 14
2006 22
2007 28
2008 37
2009 22
2010 29
2011 59
2012 22
2013 48
2014 34
2015 36
2016 19
2017 36
2018 26
2019 29
2020 37
2021 35
2022 17
2023 24
2024 21
2025 11
2026 1
Total 853
Download as CSV

Charles E. Wade publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Wade sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 788 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 788
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles E. Wade D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles E. Wade sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 116–117 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318 116
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Charles E. Wade is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research contributions primarily span the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Neurology.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to trauma and emergency care, hemorrhage control, and critical resuscitation strategies. Their main research themes include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies, Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation, Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Abdominal Trauma and Injuries, Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management, Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment, and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances.

Frequent venues for their research publications include The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open, Journal of Burn Care & Research, and Shock.

Notable recent papers associated with their research network are:

  • Bleeding to death in a big city: An analysis of all trauma deaths from hemorrhage in a metropolitan area during 1 year (2020, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care)
  • Early and Empirical High-Dose Cryoprecipitate for Hemorrhage After Traumatic Injury (2023, JAMA)
  • Challenging Traditional Paradigms in Posttraumatic Pulmonary Thromboembolism (2021, JAMA Surgery)
  • Multi-Modal Analgesic Strategy for Trauma: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial (2021, Journal of the American College of Surgeons)
  • Prospective Observational Evaluation of the ER-REBOA Catheter at 6 U.S. Trauma Centers (2020, Annals of Surgery)

Throughout their career, Charles E. Wade has collaborated frequently with other researchers in the field. Key coauthors include Lillian S. Kao, John A. Harvin, John B. Holcomb, Erin E. Fox, and Bryan A. Cotton, with collaboration counts ranging from over 20 to more than 40 joint works.

Best Publications

  • Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1: 1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: The PROPPR randomized clinical trial

    John B. Holcomb;Barbara C. Tilley;Sarah Baraniuk;Erin E. Fox

  • Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): Implications for the future of combat casualty care

    Brian J. Eastridge;Robert L. Mabry;Peter Seguin;Joyce Cantrell

  • The Ratio of Blood Products Transfused Affects Mortality in Patients Receiving Massive Transfusions at a Combat Support Hospital

    Matthew A. Borgman;Philip C. Spinella;Jeremy G. Perkins;Kurt W. Grathwohl

  • Damage control resuscitation: Directly addressing the early coagulopathy of trauma

    John B. Holcomb;Don Jenkins;Peter Rhee;Jay Johannigman

  • Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations.

    David S Kauvar;Rolf Lefering;Charles E Wade

  • Combat wounds in operation Iraqi Freedom and operation Enduring Freedom

    Brett D Owens;John F Kragh;Joseph C Wenke;Joseph Macaitis

  • Neurobiology of exercise.

    Rod K. Dishman;Hans Rudolf Berthoud;Frank W. Booth;Carl W. Cotman

  • Increased plasma and platelet to red blood cell ratios improves outcome in 466 massively transfused civilian trauma patients

    John B. Holcomb;Charles E. Wade;Joel E. Michalek;Gary B. Chisholm

  • Clinical trials in head injury

    Raj K. Narayan;Mary Ellen Michel;Beth Ansell;Alex Baethmann

  • The prospective, observational, multicenter, major trauma transfusion (PROMMTT) study: Comparative effectiveness of a time-varying treatment with competing risks

    John B Holcomb;Deborah J. Del Junco;Erin E Fox;Charles E Wade

  • Causes of death in U.S. Special Operations Forces in the global war on terrorism: 2001-2004.

    John B. Holcomb;Neil R. McMullin;Lisa Pearse;Jim Caruso

  • Injury severity and causes of death from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom: 2003-2004 versus 2006.

    Joseph F. Kelly;Amber E. Ritenour;Daniel F. McLaughlin;Karen A. Bagg

  • Survival with emergency tourniquet use to stop bleeding in major limb trauma.

    John F Kragh;Thomas J Walters;David G Baer;Charles J Fox

  • Died of wounds on the battlefield: causation and implications for improving combat casualty care.

    Brian J. Eastridge;Mark Hardin;Joyce Cantrell;Lynne Oetjen-Gerdes

  • Normal Physiological Values for Conscious Pigs Used in Biomedical Research

    J. P. Hannon;C. A. Bossone;Charles E Wade

  • Practical use of emergency tourniquets to stop bleeding in major limb trauma.

    John F. Kragh;Thomas J. Walters;David G. Baer;Charles J. Fox

  • The ratio of fibrinogen to red cells transfused affects survival in casualties receiving massive transfusions at an army combat support hospital.

    Harry K. Stinger;Philip C. Spinella;Jeremy G. Perkins;Kurt W. Grathwohl

  • Increased mortality associated with the early coagulopathy of trauma in combat casualties.

    Sarah E. Niles;Daniel F. McLaughlin;Jeremy G. Perkins;Charles E. Wade

  • The epidemiology and modern management of traumatic hemorrhage: US and international perspectives

    David S Kauvar;Charles E Wade

  • Understanding combat casualty care statistics

    John B Holcomb;Lynn G. Stansbury;Howard R. Champion;Charles E Wade

Frequent Co-Authors

John B. Holcomb
John B. Holcomb University of Alabama at Birmingham
Steven E. Wolf
Steven E. Wolf The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Martin A. Schreiber
Martin A. Schreiber Oregon Health & Science University
Mitchell J. Cohen
Mitchell J. Cohen University of Colorado Denver
Pär I. Johansson
Pär I. Johansson Copenhagen University Hospital
Karen J. Brasel
Karen J. Brasel Medical College of Wisconsin
Kenji Inaba
Kenji Inaba University of Southern California
Thomas M. Scalea
Thomas M. Scalea University of Maryland, Baltimore
John R. Hess
John R. Hess University of Washington
Duane R. Hospenthal
Duane R. Hospenthal San Antonio Military Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but seeking flexible or accelerated study options, there are several online degrees to consider. Many registered nurses are now choosing rn to bsn online programs without clinicals to advance their qualifications without the need for in-person practicals. These programs are ideal for working RNs who want to progress in their careers while balancing their job and studies.

Aspiring nurse practitioners or current nurses aiming for leadership roles may find fastest dnp online program options appealing. These programs are designed for those who want to achieve a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree in the shortest time possible. There are also a wide variety of dnp programs available online, catering to different learning styles, career goals, and admission requirements.

For individuals looking to enter the nursing field quickly, a 9 month lpn program offers a fast-track route to start an entry-level nursing career. These streamlined pathways allow you to start making a difference in healthcare without a lengthy commitment. Online options make it easier than ever to find the path that meets your needs and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Charles E. Wade

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles