World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
27333
World Ranking
17893
National Ranking
8927

Richard L. Gamelli publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Gamelli sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 509 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard L. Gamelli D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Gamelli sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard L. Gamelli is affiliated with Loyola University Chicago in the United States. Their research contributions are primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on the subfield of Epidemiology. The main topics addressed in their work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes.

Their recent scholarly output includes the paper titled "288 Propranolol Use in Adult Burn Patients: Results from a Multi-center Safety and Efficacy Trial," published in 2023 in the Journal of Burn Care & Research.

The scientist frequently publishes in the Journal of Burn Care & Research. This venue has remained the primary outlet for their research dissemination.

Collaborative work is a component of their research approach, as evidenced by frequent co-authorship with several researchers, including:

  • David N. Herndon
  • Joshua Carson
  • Shawn P. Fagan
  • Celeste C. Finnerty
  • Kevin N Foster

The focus on epidemiological perspectives within burn injury management suggests an integration of clinical and population health aspects in their research methodology.

Their research outputs consist predominantly of peer-reviewed articles rather than books, with no recorded book publications to date.

Best Publications

  • Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases

    Seok Junhee Seok;Shaw Warren H. Shaw Warren;G. Cuenca Alex;N. Mindrinos Michael

  • A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans

    Steve E. Calvano;Wenzhong Xiao;Daniel R. Richards;Ramon M. Felciano

  • A genomic storm in critically injured humans

    Wenzhong Xiao;Wenzhong Xiao;Michael N. Mindrinos;Junhee Seok;Joseph Cuschieri

  • Vascular endothelial growth factor mediates angiogenic activity during the proliferative phase of wound healing.

    Nicholas N. Nissen;Peter J. Polverini;Alisa E. Koch;Michael V. Volin

  • American Burn Association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns

    David G. Greenhalgh;Jeffrey R. Saffle;James H. Holmes;Richard L. Gamelli

  • Half-a-dozen ribs: The breakpoint for mortality

    Benjamin T. Flagel;Fred A. Luchette;R. Lawrence Reed;Thomas J. Esposito

  • The Association Between Fluid Administration and Outcome Following Major Burn: A Multicenter Study

    Matthew B. Klein;Douglas Hayden;Constance Elson;Avery B. Nathens

  • Burn Injury Alters the Intestinal Microbiome and Increases Gut Permeability and Bacterial Translocation.

    Zachary M. Earley;Suhail Akhtar;Stefan J. Green;Ankur Naqib

  • Application of genome-wide expression analysis to human health and disease

    J. Perren Cobb;Michael N. Mindrinos;Carol Miller-Graziano;Steve E. Calvano

  • Thrombospondin 1 synthesis and function in wound repair.

    Luisa A. DiPietro;Nicholas N. Nissen;Richard L. Gamelli;Alisa E. Koch

  • Morbidity and survival probability in burn patients in modern burn care.

    Marc G. Jeschke;Ruxandra Pinto;Robert Kraft;Robert Kraft;Avery B. Nathens

  • Effect of blood transfusion on outcome after major burn injury: A multicenter study

    Tina L. Palmieri;Daniel M. Caruso;Kevin N. Foster;Bruce A. Cairns

  • Inhalation injury, pulmonary perturbations, and fluid resuscitation.

    Frederick W. Endorf;Richard L. Gamelli

  • Mast cells modulate the inflammatory but not the proliferative response in healing wounds.

    Eric I. Egozi;Ahalia M. Ferreira;Aime L. Burns;Richard L. Gamelli

  • Augmentations of glucose uptake and glucose transporter‐1 in macrophages following thermal injury and sepsis in mice

    Richard L Gamelli;Hong Liu;Li-Ke He;Cecilia A. Hofmann;Cecilia A. Hofmann

  • Toxic epidermal necrolysis: does immunoglobulin make a difference?

    K. M. Brown;G. M. Silver;M. Halerz;P. Walaszek

  • Norepinephrine Modulates the Inflammatory and Proliferative Phases of Wound Healing

    Ankush Gosain;Stephen B. Jones;Ravi Shankar;Richard L. Gamelli

  • Quantitative Proteome Analysis of Human Plasma following in Vivo Lipopolysaccharide Administration Using 16O/18O Labeling and the Accurate Mass and Time Tag Approach

    Wei Jun Qian;Matthew E. Monroe;Tao Liu;Jon M. Jacobs

  • A Biopsy of the Use of the Baxter Formula to Resuscitate Burns or Do We Do It Like Charlie Did It

    L. H. Engrav;P. L. Colescott;N. Kemalyan;D. M. Heimbach

  • The impact of substance use on mortality and morbidity from thermal injury

    V. McGill;Areta Kowal-Vern;Susan Gross Fisher;S. Kahn

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth J. Kovacs
Elizabeth J. Kovacs University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Nicole S. Gibran
Nicole S. Gibran University of Washington
Mashkoor A. Choudhry
Mashkoor A. Choudhry Loyola University Chicago
Ronald G. Tompkins
Ronald G. Tompkins Harvard University
David N. Herndon
David N. Herndon The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Wenzhong Xiao
Wenzhong Xiao Harvard University
Lyle L. Moldawer
Lyle L. Moldawer University of Florida
Henry V. Baker
Henry V. Baker University of Florida
Michael N. Mindrinos
Michael N. Mindrinos Stanford University
Ronald W. Davis
Ronald W. Davis Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those exploring Medicine in the USA, there are several alternative healthcare degrees and career pathways you can pursue online. Many students start with online nursing courses to develop core skills and gain valuable healthcare experience before applying to medical school or advanced programs.

If you're already a registered nurse, advancing your career can be more affordable by enrolling in the cheapest rn to bsn program. This pathway allows you to move into leadership or specialized roles in nursing while working and studying flexibly online.

Those aiming for advanced practice roles, such as nurse practitioners, should consider accredited nurse practitioner programs. These programs can prepare you for greater responsibilities, higher salaries, and expanded job opportunities.

For nurses aspiring to the highest levels of practice and leadership, the cheapest dnp programs online offer a flexible, cost-effective route to the Doctor of Nursing Practice or PhD credentials.

Exploring these online pathways can help tailor your healthcare career to your interests and budget, providing more options outside the traditional path to a medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Gamelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles