World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
159
Citations
86257
World Ranking
822
National Ranking
468

Stephen F. Badylak publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Badylak sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 586 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen F. Badylak D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen F. Badylak sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 159 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors
  • 1998 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Stephen F. Badylak is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in surgery, molecular biology, biomaterials, biomedical engineering, and immunology.

The scientist's work focuses on topics such as tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, electrospun nanofibers in biomedical applications, extracellular vesicles in disease, wound healing and treatments, microRNA in disease regulation, mesenchymal stem cell research, and bone tissue engineering materials.

Frequent publication venues include the Journal of Surgical Research, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Science Advances, Advanced Healthcare Materials, and Tissue Engineering Part A.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Lipidomics and RNA sequencing reveal a novel subpopulation of nanovesicle within extracellular matrix biomaterials (2020, Science Advances)
  • Graft IL-33 regulates infiltrating macrophages to protect against chronic rejection (2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation)
  • Silver-doped bioactive glass particles for in vivo bone tissue regeneration and enhanced methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) inhibition (2020, Materials Science and Engineering C)
  • 3D Bioprinted Patient-Specific Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds for Soft Tissue Defects (2022, Advanced Healthcare Materials)
  • Immunomodulatory matrix-bound nanovesicles mitigate acute and chronic pristane-induced rheumatoid arthritis (2022, npj Regenerative Medicine)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stephen F. Badylak include George S. Hussey, Scott A. Johnson, Raphael J. Crum, Yoram Vodovotz, and Catalina Pineda Molina.

Stephen F. Badylak has been recognized through awards such as Fellow of the National Academy of Inventors in 2018 and Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) since 1998.

Best Publications

  • A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs

    Mihaela Crisan;Solomon Veloso Yap;Louis Casteilla;Louis Casteilla;Chien-Wen Chen

  • An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes.

    Peter M. Crapo;Thomas W. Gilbert;Stephen F. Badylak

  • DECELLULARIZATION OF TISSUES AND ORGANS

    Thomas W. Gilbert;Tiffany L. Sellaro;Stephen F. Badylak

  • Reprint of: Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: Structure and function.

    Stephen F. Badylak;Donald O. Freytes;Thomas W. Gilbert

  • Whole-Organ Tissue Engineering: Decellularization and Recellularization of Three-Dimensional Matrix Scaffolds

    Stephen F. Badylak;Doris Taylor;Korkut Uygun

  • The extracellular matrix as a biologic scaffold material.

    Stephen F. Badylak

  • The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

    Stephen F Badylak

  • Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine.

    Bryan N. Brown;Buddy D. Ratner;Stuart B. Goodman;Salomon Amar

  • Immune response to biologic scaffold materials.

    Stephen F. Badylak;Thomas W. Gilbert

  • Large area submucosal graft constructs and method for making the same

    Umesh H. Patel;Michael C. Hiles;Bryan A. Whitson;Boyle Cheng

  • Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction.

    Stephen F. Badylak

  • Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component

    Bryan N. Brown;Jolene E. Valentin;Ann M. Stewart-Akers;George P. McCabe

  • Tissue graft composition

    Stephen F. Badylak;Leslie A. Geddes;Gary Lantz;Arthur C. Coffey

  • Macrophage Phenotype as a Determinant of Biologic Scaffold Remodeling

    Stephen F. Badylak;Jolene E. Valentin;Anjani K. Ravindra;George P. McCabe

  • Identification of extractable growth factors from small intestinal submucosa.

    Sherry L. Voytik-Harbin;Andrew O. Brightman;Meredith R. Kraine;Beverly Waisner

  • Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive remodeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh materials.

    Bryan N. Brown;Ricardo Londono;Stephen Tottey;Li Zhang

  • Extracellular matrix-based materials for regenerative medicine

    George S. Hussey;Jenna L. Dziki;Stephen F. Badylak

  • Extracellular matrix hydrogels from decellularized tissues: Structure and function.

    Lindsey T. Saldin;Madeline C. Cramer;Sachin S. Velankar;Lisa J. White;Lisa J. White

  • Small intestinal submucosa as a large diameter vascular graft in the dog

    Stephen F. Badylak;Gary C. Lantz;Arthur Coffey;Leslie A. Geddes

  • Whole-Organ Tissue Engineering: Decellularization and Recellularization of Three-Dimensional

    Stephen F. Badylak;Doris Taylor;Korkut Uygun

Frequent Co-Authors

William R. Wagner
William R. Wagner University of Pittsburgh
Jack Henkin
Jack Henkin Northwestern University
James E. Lingeman
James E. Lingeman Indiana University
Donna B. Stolz
Donna B. Stolz University of Pittsburgh
Eric T. Poehlman
Eric T. Poehlman University of Vermont
Alan J. Russell
Alan J. Russell Carnegie Mellon University
Eric J. Beckman
Eric J. Beckman University of Pittsburgh
Yi Hong
Yi Hong The University of Texas at Arlington
Buddy D. Ratner
Buddy D. Ratner University of Washington
Savio L. C. Woo
Savio L. C. Woo Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always mean following a traditional path. Many students are now turning to online degrees for greater flexibility and affordability. Online nursing programs, in particular, are popular choices for those seeking a healthcare career with a strong job outlook.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their skills and qualifications, the cheapest rn to bsn programs offer a cost-effective way to earn a bachelor's degree. If you’re considering a future as a nurse practitioner, researching the cheapest online fnp program can lead to advanced clinical roles and greater autonomy.

Those looking for more general nursing pathways can review affordable nursing programs at both undergraduate and graduate levels. For nurses interested in research, teaching, or leadership, there are also online nursing doctoral programs designed to open doors to academia and policy-making.

Online healthcare degrees make it easier to tailor your academic journey and career goals, especially for those balancing work or family commitments while pursuing education.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen F. Badylak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles