World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
6880
World Ranking
5108
National Ranking
1746

W. Mark Ford publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Mark Ford sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 238 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

W. Mark Ford D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Mark Ford sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

W. Mark Ford is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with substantial contributions to agricultural and biological sciences.

The scientist has published extensively in several subfields including ecology, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, global and planetary change, ecological modeling, and developmental biology. Their main research topics cover bat biology and ecology studies, wildlife ecology and conservation, marine animal studies overview, species distribution and climate change, fire effects on ecosystems, rangeland and wildlife management, as well as animal vocal communication and behavior.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Ecosphere
  • Acta Chiropterologica
  • International Journal of Forestry Research
  • Southeastern Naturalist
  • Animals

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by W. Mark Ford are:

  • Bat activity patterns relative to temporal and weather effects in a temperate coastal environment, 2021, Global Ecology and Conservation
  • White-nose syndrome-related changes to Mid-Atlantic bat communities across an urban-to-rural gradient, 2021, BMC Zoology
  • Winter roost selection of Lasiurine tree bats in a pyric landscape, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Occupancy and Detectability of Northern Long-eared Bats in the Lake States Region, 2020, Wildlife Society Bulletin
  • Post-white-nose syndrome passive acoustic sampling effort for determining bat species occupancy within the mid-Atlantic region, 2021, Ecological Indicators

Frequent collaborators working with W. Mark Ford include:

  • Emily D. Thorne
  • Elaine L. Barr
  • Sabrina Deeley
  • Michael J. Cherry
  • Corinne A. Diggins

The scope of W. Mark Ford's research demonstrates a focus on understanding the ecology and conservation of bat species, particularly in relation to environmental factors such as climate, fire, and habitat changes. Their work also addresses broader ecological topics including species distribution patterns influenced by climate change and the effects of fire on ecosystems.

Research outputs contribute to knowledge in several overlapping disciplines, indicating an interdisciplinary approach that integrates behavioral studies, ecological modeling, and conservation biology to address complex environmental challenges.

Best Publications

  • Relating bat species presence to simple habitat measures in a central Appalachian forest

    W. Mark Ford;Michael A. Menzel;Jane L. Rodrigue;Jennifer M. Menzel

  • EFFECT OF HABITAT AND FORAGING HEIGHT ON BAT ACTIVITY IN THE COASTAL PLAIN OF SOUTH CAROLINA

    Jennifer M. Menzel;Michael A. Menzel;John C. Kilgo;W. Mark Ford

  • Effects of a community restoration fire on small mammals and herpetofauna in the southern Appalachians

    Unknown

  • Bat activity in harvested and intact forest stands in the Allegheny Mountains.

    Sheldon F. Owen;Michael A. Menzel;John W. Edwards;W. Mark Ford

  • Effects of group selection silviculture in bottomland hardwoods on the spatial activity patterns of bats

    Michael A. Menzel;Timothy C. Carter;Jennifer M. Menzel;W. Mark Ford

  • Home-range Size and Habitat Used by the Northern Myotis (Myotis septentrionalis)

    Sheldon F. Owen;Michael A. Menzel;W. Mark Ford;Brian R. Chapman

  • Roost tree selection by northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) maternity colonies in an industrial forest of the central Appalachian mountains

    Michael A Menzel;Sheldon F Owen;W.Mark Ford;John W Edwards

  • Capture and Reproductive Trends in Summer Bat Communities in West Virginia: Assessing the Impact of White-Nose Syndrome

    Karen E. Francl;Karen E. Francl;W. Mark Ford;W. Mark Ford;Dale W. Sparks;Dale W. Sparks;Virgil Brack;Virgil Brack

  • Presence and Absence of Bats Across Habitat Scales in the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina

    W. Mark Ford;Jennifer M. Menzel;Michael A. Menzel;John W. Edwards

  • Patterns of acoustical activity of bats prior to and following white-nose syndrome occurrence

    W. Mark Ford;Eric R. Britzke;Christopher A. Dobony;Jane L. Rodrigue

  • Distribution and activity of bats at local and landscape scales within a rural-urban gradient

    Joshua B. Johnson;J. Edward Gates;W. Mark Ford

  • Fire Effects on Wildlife in the Central Hardwoods and Appalachian Regions, USA

    Craig A. Harper;W. Mark Ford;Marcus A. Lashley;Christopher E. Moorman

  • Review of the forest habitat relationships of the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis)

    Michael A. Menzel;Jennifer M. Menzel;Timothy C. Carter;W. Mark Ford

  • Summer habitat use and home-range analysis of the endangered Indiana bat

    Jennifer M. Menzel;W. Mark Ford;Michael A. Menzel;Timothy C. Carter

  • Stand-age, stand characteristics, and landform effects on understory herbaceous communities in southern Appalachian cove-hardwoods

    W.Mark Ford;Richard H Odom;Philip E Hale;Brian R Chapman

  • Stand age and habitat influences on salamanders in Appalachian cove hardwood forests

    W. Mark Ford;Brian R. Chapman;Michael A. Menzel;Richard H. Odom

  • Amphibian and reptile community response to coarse woody debris manipulations in upland loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) forests

    Audrey K. Owens;Kurtis R. Moseley;Timothy S. McCay;Steven B. Castleberry

  • A comparison of 2 acoustical bat survey techniques

    Joshua Begg Johnson;Michael A. Menzel;John W. Edwards;W. Mark Ford

  • Bat Activity in a Forest Landscape of Central Massachusetts

    Robert T. Brooks;W. Mark Ford

  • Developing a habitat model for the endangered Virginia northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus fuscus) in the Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia

    Richard H Odom;W.Mark Ford;John W Edwards;Craig W Stihler

  • Tree-roost Characteristics of Subadult and Female Adult Evening Bats (Nycticeius humeralis) in the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina

    Michael A. Menzel;Timothy C. Carter;W. Mark Ford;Brian R. Chapman

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl V. Miller
Karl V. Miller University of Georgia
John C. Kilgo
John C. Kilgo US Forest Service
Christopher E. Moorman
Christopher E. Moorman North Carolina State University
Robin E. Russell
Robin E. Russell United States Geological Survey
David A. Ray
David A. Ray Texas Tech University
W. Michael Aust
W. Michael Aust Virginia Tech
L. Lee Grismer
L. Lee Grismer La Sierra University
Terry W. Henkel
Terry W. Henkel Humboldt State University
Lance A. Durden
Lance A. Durden Georgia Southern University
Stephen R. Goldberg
Stephen R. Goldberg Whittier College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens the door to various interdisciplinary fields that bridge science, environment, and human behavior. For those interested in understanding the impact of environmental changes on communities, an clinical psychology online degree can provide insights into the psychological effects of ecological stressors.

If your interests lean toward helping young people adapt to environmental and societal challenges, consider pursuing an online masters in child psychology. This path explores developmental responses to changing surroundings and offers diverse career options.

Another pathway is a online master's in counseling, which equips graduates to support individuals and groups adapting to ecological and lifestyle changes. Those interested in the intersection of environment, behavior, and law may explore what can you do with a masters in forensic psychology.

Each of these online programs offers flexible options to align your studies with evolving career goals in ecology, psychology, and human wellbeing.

Best Scientists Citing W. Mark Ford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles