World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
W. Michael Aust

W. Michael Aust

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
34
Citations
3902
World Ranking
9483
National Ranking
3400

W. Michael Aust publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Michael Aust sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 146 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

W. Michael Aust D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Michael Aust sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

W. Michael Aust is affiliated with Virginia Tech in the United States and conducts research primarily within the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work extensively covers multiple subfields including Ecology, Soil Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Mechanics of Materials.

The scientist's research topics focus mainly on soil erosion and sediment transport, hydrology and sediment transport processes, fire effects on ecosystems, forest management and policy, rangeland and wildlife management, forest biomass utilization and management, as well as peatlands and wetlands ecology.

Frequent publication venues for W. Michael Aust include:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Forest Science
  • International Journal of Forest Engineering
  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • New Forests

W. Michael Aust has collaborated often with coauthors such as M. Chad Bolding, Scott M. Barrett, T. Adam Coates, Brent S. Hawks, and Erik Schilling.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Aust include:

  • "Linkages between Forestry Best Management Practices and erosion in the southeastern U.S." (2022, Journal of Environmental Management)
  • "Forest composition, fuel loading, and soil chemistry resulting from 50 years of forest management and natural disturbance in two southeastern Coastal Plain watersheds, USA" (2020, Forest Ecology and Management)
  • "Effects of amendments and microtopography on created tidal freshwater wetland soil morphology and carbon" (2020, Soil Science Society of America Journal)
  • "Characteristics of forest biomass harvesting operations and markets in Virginia" (2022, Biomass and Bioenergy)
  • "Estimated Erosion from Clearcut Timber Harvests in the Southeastern United States" (2022, Forest Science)

Best Publications

  • Forestry best management practices for timber harvesting and site preparation in the eastern United States: An overview of water quality and productivity research during the past 20 years (1982–2002)

    W. Michael Aust;Charles R. Blinn

  • Effectiveness of forestry best management practices in the United States: literature review.

    Richard Cristan;W. Michael Aust;M. Chad Bolding;Scott M. Barrett

  • Forest operations, extreme flooding events, and considerations for hydrologic modeling in the Appalachians--A review

    M.H. Eisenbies;W.M. Aust;J.A. Burger;M.B. Adams

  • Soil quality assessment in domesticated forests – a southern pine example

    Daniel L Kelting;James A Burger;Steven C Patterson;W.Michael Aust

  • Changes in surface water table depth and soil physical properties after harvest and establishment of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in Atlantic coastal plain wetlands of South Carolina

    Yi-Jun Xu;James A Burger;W Michael Aust;Steven C Patterson

  • Intensive Utilization of Harvest Residues in Southern Pine Plantations: Quantities Available and Implications for Nutrient Budgets and Sustainable Site Productivity

    M. H. Eisenbies;E. D. Vance;W. M. Aust;J. R. Seiler

  • Biomass and carbon pools of disturbed riparian forests

    Laura A.B. Giese;W.M. Aust;Randall K. Kolka;Carl C. Trettin

  • EFFECTS OF FOREST HARVESTING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON SURFACE WATER QUALITY IN THE VIRGINIA COASTAL PLAIN

    T. M. Wynn;S. Mostaghimi;J. W. Frazee;P. W. McClellan

  • Effectiveness of best management practices for sediment reduction at operational forest stream crossings

    Laura R. Wear;W. Michael Aust;M. Chad Bolding;Brian D. Strahm

  • Compaction and rutting during harvesting affect better drained soils more than poorly drained soils on wet pine flats.

    W. Michael Aust;Mark D. Tippett;James A. Burger;William H. McKee

  • Visually Determined Soil Disturbance Classes Used as Indices of Forest Harvesting Disturbance

    W. Michael Aust;James A. Burger;Emily A. Carter;David P. Preston

  • Sediment trapping by streamside management zones of various widths after forest harvest and site preparation

    Unknown

  • Soil Physical and Hydrological Changes Associated with Logging a Wet Pine Flat with Wide-Tired Skidders

    W. M. Aust;T. W. Reisinger;J. A. Burger;B. J. Stokes

  • Spatial and temporal patterns of carbon storage and species richness in three South Carolina coastal plain riparian forests

    Laura A Giese;W.Michael Aust;Carl C Trettin;Randall K Kolka

  • Wood-energy market impact on competition, procurement practices, and profitability of landowners and forest products industry in the U.S. south

    Joseph L. Conrad;M. Chad Bolding;Robert L. Smith;W. Michael Aust

  • Soil physical disturbance and logging residue effects on changes in soil productivity in five-year-old pine plantations

    Mark H. Eisenbies;James A. Burger;W. Michael Aust;Steve C. Patterson

  • Recovery status of a tupelo-cypress wetland seven years after disturbance: silvicultural implications

    W.Michael Aust;Stephen H. Schoenholtz;Thomas W. Zaebst;Beth A. Szabo

  • Operational forest stream crossings effects on water quality in the Virginia Piedmont

    Unknown

  • Comparative effects of aerial and ground logging on soil properties in a tupelo-cypress wetland

    W. Michael Aust;R. Lea

  • Sediment delivery from bare and graveled forest road stream crossing approaches in the Virginia Piedmont

    Kristopher R. Brown;W. Michael Aust;Kevin J. McGuire

  • National status of state developed and implemented forestry best management practices for protecting water quality in the United States

    Richard Cristan;W. Michael Aust;M. Chad Bolding;Scott M. Barrett

  • Long-Term Effects of Drainage, Bedding, and Fertilization on Growth of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.) in the Coastal Plain of Virginia

    Thomas R. Fox;Kevin H. Kyle;Lisa J. Andrews;W. Michael Aust

  • Soil Temperature and Organic Matter in a Disturbed Forested Wetland

    W. Michael Aust;R. Lea

  • Benefits and costs of forestry best management practices in Virginia.

    W. M. Aust;R. M. Shaffer;J. A. Burger

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Burger
James A. Burger Virginia Tech
Kevin J. McGuire
Kevin J. McGuire Virginia Tech
John R. Seiler
John R. Seiler Virginia Tech
Carl C. Trettin
Carl C. Trettin US Forest Service
James M. Vose
James M. Vose North Carolina State University
Randall K. Kolka
Randall K. Kolka US Forest Service
J. Morgan Varner
J. Morgan Varner US Forest Service
W. Mark Ford
W. Mark Ford United States Geological Survey
Thomas R. Fox
Thomas R. Fox Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany)
Rodney E. Will
Rodney E. Will Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields can open up diverse career opportunities. Public administration degrees, such as online MPA degrees, prepare graduates for leadership roles in government and non-profits focused on environmental policy and sustainability initiatives.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is crucial, making sociology a complementary field. Pursuing one of the best online bachelors in sociology programs can deepen knowledge about human behavior and community dynamics related to environmental change.

For those aiming to advance their expertise in education, especially in environmental education, doctoral pathways without traditional barriers are becoming more accessible. Options like education doctoral programs without dissertation provide flexible routes to doctorate credentials.

Additionally, educators can upgrade their qualifications by transitioning through EDS to EDD programs online, refining their skills to better incorporate environmental topics in curricula.

Best Scientists Citing W. Michael Aust

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles