World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
8041
World Ranking
7620
National Ranking
2721

Daniel Markewitz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Markewitz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniel Markewitz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Markewitz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Markewitz is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, focusing on various aspects of soil and ecosystem dynamics.

The main subfields of study in their work include:

  • Soil Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Atmospheric Science

Key topics explored in their research are:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Daniel Markewitz has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Sharon Billings
  • Daniel deB. Richter
  • Allan R. Bacon
  • Emma Hauser
  • Lori A. Sutter

Their work has appeared consistently in several publication venues, notably:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Biogeochemistry
  • Geoderma

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel Markewitz include:

  • Soil production and the soil geomorphology legacy of Grove Karl Gilbert, 2020, Soil Science Society of America Journal
  • Regional Assessment of Carbon Pool Response to Intensive Silvicultural Practices in Loblolly Pine Plantations, 2021, Forests
  • Spatial and Temporal Patterns in Atmospheric Deposition of Dissolved Organic Carbon, 2022, Global Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Persistent anthropogenic legacies structure depth dependence of regenerating rooting systems and their functions, 2020, Biogeochemistry
  • Agricultural Impacts on Hydrobiogeochemical Cycling in the Amazon: Is There Any Solution?, 2020, Water

Best Publications

  • Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest

    Daniel D. Richter;Daniel Markewitz;Susan E. Trumbore;Carol G. Wells

  • The effects of partial throughfall exclusion on canopy processes, aboveground production, and biogeochemistry of an Amazon forest

    D. C. Nepstad;P. Moutinho;M. B. Dias‐Filho;E. Davidson

  • How Deep Is Soil?Soil, the zone of the earth's crust that is biologically active, is much deeper than has been thought by many ecologists

    Daniel D. Richter;Daniel Markewitz

  • Understanding soil change : soil sustainability over millennia, centuries, and decades

    Daniel D. Richter;Daniel Markewitz

  • Understanding Soil Change

    Daniel D. Richter;Daniel Markewitz

  • The age of fine-root carbon in three forests of the eastern United States measured by radiocarbon

    J. B. Gaudinski;Susan E. Trumbore;E. A. Davidson;A. C. Cook

  • SOIL CHEMICAL CHANGE DURING THREE DECADES IN AN OLD-FIELD LOBLOLLY PINE (PINUS TAEDA L.) ECOSYSTEM'

    D. D. Richter;D. Markewitz;C. G. Wells;H. L. Allen

  • Soil moisture depletion under simulated drought in the Amazon: impacts on deep root uptake.

    Daniel Markewitz;Scott Devine;Eric A. Davidson;Paulo Brando

  • NUTRIENT LOSS AND REDISTRIBUTION AFTER FOREST CLEARING ON A HIGHLY WEATHERED SOIL IN AMAZONIA

    Daniel Markewitz;Eric Davidson;Paulo Moutinho;Daniel Nepstad

  • Legacies of agriculture and forest regrowth in the nitrogen of old-field soils

    Daniel D Richter;Daniel Markewitz;Daniel Markewitz;Paul R Heine;Virginia Jin;Virginia Jin

  • Soil Aggregates and Associated Organic Matter under Conventional Tillage, No-Tillage, and Forest Succession after Three Decades

    Scott Devine;Daniel Markewitz;Paul Hendrix;David Coleman

  • Control of cation concentrations in stream waters by surface soil processes in an Amazonian watershed

    Daniel Markewitz;Daniel Markewitz;Eric A. Davidson;Ricardo de O. Figueiredo;Reynaldo L. Victoria

  • Bioavailability of slowly cycling soil phosphorus: major restructuring of soil P fractions over four decades in an aggrading forest

    Daniel D. Richter;H. Lee Allen;Jianwei Li;Daniel Markewitz

  • Ecological research in the Large-scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia: Early results

    Michael Keller;Michael Keller;Ane Alencar;Gregory P. Asner;Bobby Braswell

  • Three decades of observed soil acidification in the Calhoun Experimental Forest: Has acid rain made a difference?

    Daniel Markewitz;Daniel D. Richter;H. Lee Allen;J. Byron Urrego

  • Meeting global policy commitments: carbon sequestration and southern pine forests

    Kurt H. Johnsen;David N. Wear;R. Oren;R.O. Teskey

  • Effect of complete competition control and annual fertilization on stem growth and canopy relations for a chronosequence of loblolly pine plantations in the lower coastal plain of Georgia

    B.E Borders;R.E Will;D Markewitz;A Clark

  • Carbon cycling in a loblolly pine forest: implications for the missing carbon sink and for the concept of soil.

    D.D. Richter;D. Markewitz;J.K. Dunsomb;P.R. Heine

  • Fossil fuel carbon emissions from silviculture: Impacts on net carbon sequestration in forests

    Daniel Markewitz

  • Phosphorus cycling in a small watershed in the Brazilian Cerrado: impacts of frequent burning

    Júlio Carlos França Resende;Daniel Markewitz;Carlos Augusto Klink;Mercedes Maria da Cunha Bustamante

  • The effects of partial throughfall exclusion on canopy processes, aboveground production, and biogeochemistry of an Amazon forest : Large-scale biosphere-atmosphere experiment in Amazonia (LBA)

    D. C. Nepstad;P. Moutinho;M. B. Dias-Filho;E. Davidson

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Richter
Daniel Richter Duke University
Eric A. Davidson
Eric A. Davidson University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Robert O. Teskey
Robert O. Teskey University of Georgia
Rodney E. Will
Rodney E. Will Oklahoma State University
Sharon A. Billings
Sharon A. Billings University of Kansas
Alexander J. Thompson
Alexander J. Thompson Ascension Health
Eric J. Jokela
Eric J. Jokela University of Florida
Timothy A. Martin
Timothy A. Martin University of Florida
Lisa J. Samuelson
Lisa J. Samuelson Auburn University
Alex V. Krusche
Alex V. Krusche Universidade de São Paulo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Programs like online sociology bachelor programs offer insights into human behavior and social patterns that are critical in addressing environmental challenges.

Those aiming to advance their education further can consider online doctoral programs without dissertation, which provide flexible routes to gaining advanced knowledge without the traditional dissertation hurdle.

Additionally, transitioning from educational specialist degrees through eds to edd programs allows educators and professionals to deepen their expertise while maintaining an applied focus, benefiting environmental education and policy roles.

For those passionate about social work’s intersection with environmental justice, dsw online programs offer accessible doctoral training, equipping graduates to advocate effectively for sustainable communities.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Markewitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles