World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8394
World Ranking
6064
National Ranking
2198

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
45
Citations
8126
World Ranking
2826
National Ranking
697

Timothy A. Martin publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy A. Martin sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 122 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Timothy A. Martin D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy A. Martin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy A. Martin is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a strong focus on subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science, Plant Science, and Environmental Engineering.

Their work addresses topics including Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, Forest Ecology and Management, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Tree-Ring Climate Responses, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior.

Martin has contributed publications to various scholarly venues, including Forest Ecology and Management, SSRN Electronic Journal, Remote Sensing, Tree Physiology, and Earth System Science Data. Among their recent papers are:

  • Global transpiration data from sap flow measurements: the SAPFLUXNET database, 2021, Earth System Science Data
  • Detection of Crop Seeding and Harvest through Analysis of Time-Series Sentinel-1 Interferometric SAR Data, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Moving to Automated Tree Inventory: Comparison of UAS-Derived Lidar and Photogrammetric Data with Manual Ground Estimates, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Regional Assessment of Carbon Pool Response to Intensive Silvicultural Practices in Loblolly Pine Plantations, 2021, Forests
  • SWAT-3PG: Improving forest growth simulation with a process-based forest model in SWAT, 2023, Environmental Modelling & Software

Frequent collaborators include Jason G. Vogel, Rosvel Bracho, Carlos A. González-Benecke, Eric J. Jokela, and Daniel Markewitz. These coauthors have contributed to multiple research efforts alongside Martin, reflecting active collaboration within their research community.

Best Publications

  • Ecosystem carbon dioxide fluxes after disturbance in forests of North America

    B. D. Amiro;A. G. Barr;J. G. Barr;T. A. Black

  • Accuracy of Genomic Selection Methods in a Standard Data Set of Loblolly Pine ( Pinus taeda L.)

    Márcio F. R. Resende;Patricio Muñoz;Marcos D. V. Resende;Marcos D. V. Resende;Dorian J. Garrick

  • Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation, and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: Functional relations and potential climate feedbacks

    S. V. Ollinger;A. D. Richardson;M. E. Martin;D. Y. Hollinger

  • Estimation of Net Ecosystem Carbon Exchange for the Conterminous United States by Combining MODIS and AmeriFlux Data

    Jingfeng Xiao;Qianlai Zhuang;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Beverly E. Law

  • A continuous measure of gross primary production for the conterminous United States derived from MODIS and AmeriFlux data

    Jingfeng Xiao;Qianlai Zhuang;Beverly E. Law;Jiquan Chen

  • Production dynamics of intensively managed loblolly pine stands in the southern United States: a synthesis of seven long-term experiments

    Eric J. Jokela;Philip M. Dougherty;Timothy A. Martin

  • Assessing net ecosystem carbon exchange of U.S. terrestrial ecosystems by integrating eddy covariance flux measurements and satellite observations

    Jingfeng Xiao;Qianlai Zhuang;Beverly E. Law;Dennis D. Baldocchi

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • Respiration from the organ level to the stand

    Douglas G. Sprugel;Michael G. Ryan;J. Renée Brooks;Kristiina A. Vogt

  • Effects of ontogeny and soil nutrient supply on production, allocation, and leaf area efficiency in loblolly and slash pine stands

    Eric J. Jokela;Timothy A. Martin

  • Quantitative genetic analysis of biomass and wood chemistry of Populus under different nitrogen levels

    Evandro Novaes;Luis Osorio;Derek R. Drost;Brianna L. Miles

  • Short‐term physiological and developmental responses to nitrogen availability in hybrid poplar

    Janice E. K. Cooke;Janice E. K. Cooke;Timothy A. Martin;John M. Davis

  • Boundary layer conductance, leaf temperature and transpiration of Abies amabilis branches.

    Timothy A. Martin;Thomas M. Hinckley;Frederick C. Meinzer;Douglas G. Sprugel

  • Crown conductance and tree and stand transpiration in a second growth **Abies amabilis** forest

    T A Martin;K J Brown;J Cermák;R Ceulemans

  • Evaluating spatial and temporal patterns of MODIS GPP over the conterminous U.S. against flux measurements and a process model

    Fangmin Zhang;Fangmin Zhang;Jing M. Chen;Jiquan Chen;Christopher M. Gough

  • Global transpiration data from sap flow measurements: the SAPFLUXNET database

    Rafael Poyatos;Víctor Granda;Víctor Flo;Mark A. Adams;Mark A. Adams

  • Twenty-Five Years of Intensive Forest Management with Southern Pines: Important Lessons Learned

    Eric J. Jokela;Timothy A. Martin;Jason G. Vogel

  • Thermal optimality of net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide and underlying mechanisms.

    Shuli Niu;Yiqi Luo;Yiqi Luo;Shenfeng Fei;Wenping Yuan

  • Stand development and production dynamics of loblolly pine under a range of cultural treatments in north-central Florida USA

    Timothy A. Martin;Eric J. Jokela

  • Effects of a Prescribed Fire on Understory Vegetation, Carbon Pools, and Soil Nutrients in a Longleaf Pine-Slash Pine Forest in Florida

    M. Lavoie;G. Starr;G. Starr;M.C. Mack;T. A. Martin

  • The cohesion-tension theory

    Guillermo Angeles;Barbara Bond;John S. Boyer;Tim Brodribb

  • Carbon exchange of a mature, naturally regenerated pine forest in north Florida

    Thomas L. Powell;Thomas L. Powell;Henry L. Gholz;Kenneth L. Clark;Kenneth L. Clark;Gregory Starr;Gregory Starr

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric J. Jokela
Eric J. Jokela University of Florida
Asko Noormets
Asko Noormets Texas A&M University
Gregory Starr
Gregory Starr University of Alabama
Wendell P. Cropper
Wendell P. Cropper University of Florida
Lisa J. Samuelson
Lisa J. Samuelson Auburn University
Rosvel Bracho
Rosvel Bracho University of Florida
Ankur R. Desai
Ankur R. Desai University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sean P. Burns
Sean P. Burns University of Colorado Boulder
Robert O. Teskey
Robert O. Teskey University of Georgia
Jiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Timothy A. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles