World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
8663
World Ranking
5487
National Ranking
1879

Gregory Starr publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory Starr sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 110 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Gregory Starr D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory Starr sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gregory Starr is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with a significant number of publications addressing subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science, and Plant Science.

Their scholarly output encompasses various topics including Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Forest Ecology and Management, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, and Tree Root and Stability Studies.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Gregory Starr include:

  • "Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites," 2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • "A general pattern of trade-offs between ecosystem resistance and resilience to tropical cyclones," 2022, Science Advances
  • "A Research Framework to Integrate Cross-Ecosystem Responses to Tropical Cyclones," 2020, BioScience
  • "Mapping CO2 fluxes of cypress swamp and marshes in the Greater Everglades using eddy covariance measurements and Landsat data," 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • "Impact of model choice in predicting urban forest storm damage when data is uncertain," 2022, Landscape and Urban Planning

They frequently collaborate with several co-authors including Christina L. Staudhammer, Steven F. Oberbauer, Susanne Wiesner, Sparkle L. Malone, and Rosvel Bracho.

Their work is regularly published in a selection of scientific venues such as OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Ecosphere, and Forest Ecology and Management.

Best Publications

  • RESPONSES OF TUNDRA PLANTS TO EXPERIMENTAL WARMING:META‐ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TUNDRA EXPERIMENT

    A. M. Arft;M. D. Walker;J. Gurevitch;J. M. Alatalo

  • Ecosystem carbon dioxide fluxes after disturbance in forests of North America

    B. D. Amiro;A. G. Barr;J. G. Barr;T. A. Black

  • Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites

    Housen Chu;Xiangzhong Luo;Xiangzhong Luo;Zutao Ouyang;W. Stephen Chan

  • Large loss of CO2 in winter observed across the northern permafrost region

    Susan M. Natali;Jennifer D. Watts;Brendan M. Rogers;Stefano Potter

  • TUNDRA CO2 FLUXES IN RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTAL WARMING ACROSS LATITUDINAL AND MOISTURE GRADIENTS

    Steven F. Oberbauer;Craig E. Tweedie;Jeff M. Welker;Jace T. Fahnestock

  • Estimation of Net Ecosystem Carbon Exchange for the Conterminous United States by Combining MODIS and AmeriFlux Data

    Jingfeng Xiao;Qianlai Zhuang;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Beverly E. Law

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire: an expert assessment

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

  • A continuous measure of gross primary production for the conterminous United States derived from MODIS and AmeriFlux data

    Jingfeng Xiao;Qianlai Zhuang;Beverly E. Law;Jiquan Chen

  • Assessing net ecosystem carbon exchange of U.S. terrestrial ecosystems by integrating eddy covariance flux measurements and satellite observations

    Jingfeng Xiao;Qianlai Zhuang;Beverly E. Law;Dennis D. Baldocchi

  • A new low-power, open-path instrument for measuring methane flux by eddy covariance

    D. McDermitt;G. Burba;L. Xu;T. Anderson

  • Future climate and fire interactions in the southeastern region of the United States

    Robert J. Mitchell;Yongqiang Liu;Joseph J. O’Brien;Katherine J. Elliott

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF ARCTIC EVERGREENS UNDER SNOW: IMPLICATIONS FOR TUNDRA ECOSYSTEM CARBON BALANCE

    Gregory Starr;Steven F. Oberbauer

  • Ecological Forestry in the Southeast: Understanding the Ecology of Fuels

    R.J. Mitchell;J.K. Hiers;J. O’Brien;G. Starr

  • Effects of lengthened growing season and soil warming on the phenology and physiology of Polygonum bistorta.

    G.R.egory Starr;Steven F. Oberbauer;E.R.I.C. W. Pop

  • Global parameterization and validation of a two-leaf light use efficiency model for predicting gross primary production across FLUXNET sites

    Yanlian Zhou;Xiaocui Wu;Weimin Ju;Weimin Ju;Jing M. Chen

  • Effects of a Prescribed Fire on Understory Vegetation, Carbon Pools, and Soil Nutrients in a Longleaf Pine-Slash Pine Forest in Florida

    M. Lavoie;G. Starr;G. Starr;M.C. Mack;T. A. Martin

  • Latitudinal patterns of magnitude and interannual variability in net ecosystem exchange regulated by biological and environmental variables

    Wenping Yuan;Yiqi Luo;Andrew D. Richardson;Ram Oren

  • Redefinition and global estimation of basal ecosystem respiration rate

    Wenping Yuan;Yiqi Luo;Xianglan Li;Shuguang Liu;Shuguang Liu

  • Carbon exchange of a mature, naturally regenerated pine forest in north Florida

    Thomas L. Powell;Thomas L. Powell;Henry L. Gholz;Kenneth L. Clark;Kenneth L. Clark;Gregory Starr;Gregory Starr

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven F. Oberbauer
Steven F. Oberbauer Florida International University
Henry W. Loescher
Henry W. Loescher National Ecological Observatory Network
Timothy A. Martin
Timothy A. Martin University of Florida
Walter C. Oechel
Walter C. Oechel San Diego State University
Paul C. Stoy
Paul C. Stoy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Donatella Zona
Donatella Zona San Diego State University
Jiquan Chen
Jiquan Chen Michigan State University
Ankur R. Desai
Ankur R. Desai University of Wisconsin–Madison
Henry L. Gholz
Henry L. Gholz National Science Foundation
Michael G. Ryan
Michael G. Ryan Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Ecology and Evolution, many online degrees can expand your expertise or offer flexible career pathways. You might consider blending scientific knowledge with areas like social work, nursing, or organizational management.

Healthcare professionals, for example, can benefit from specialized programs such as bsn to msn online, which allows registered nurses to advance their careers while gaining relevant environmental health knowledge. Similarly, earning a master’s through social work master programs online can prepare you for roles involving community outreach, conservation advocacy, and social policy.

For maximum flexibility and value, look into accredited nonprofit online universities that offer a wide range of degree options, from environmental science to biology. If you’re affiliated with the military, you might benefit from the support and flexibility of the best online colleges for military, which often provide resources tailored to service members and veterans.

These online degree and career pathway options help you build a multidisciplinary foundation for impactful work in ecology, evolution, and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory Starr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles