World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7368 6871 3973 3611 82 18193

Hui Liao publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hui Liao between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hui Liao published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2016. 15 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2016. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 10 publications
2001 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hui Liao: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 5
2007 5
2008 3
2009 3
2010 2
2011 7
2012 4
2013 7
2014 9
2015 4
2016 10
2017 8
2018 2
2019 6
2020 5
2021 3
2022 6
2023 3
2024 5
2025 10
Total 114
Download as CSV

Hui Liao publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hui Liao sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 82
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Hui Liao D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hui Liao sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Hui Liao is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park, in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the social sciences and psychology, with significant contributions in related subfields such as sociology and political science, social psychology, health, general health professions, and clinical psychology.

The main topics addressed in Hui Liao's work include health disparities and outcomes, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, healthcare systems and reforms, global health care issues, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, team dynamics and performance, and chronic disease management strategies.

The following are recent papers authored or coauthored by Hui Liao, detailing the title, year of publication, and the venue:

  • Relationship between chronic diseases and depression: the mediating effect of pain, 2021, BMC Psychiatry
  • Association among multimorbidity, physical disability and depression trajectories: a study of urban-rural differences in China, 2021, Quality of Life Research
  • Disentangling stereotypes from social reality: Astrological stereotypes and discrimination in China., 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • When leader-member exchange differentiation improves work group functioning: The combined roles of differentiation bases and reward interdependence, 2020, Personnel Psychology
  • How and when top manager authentic leadership influences team voice: A moderated mediation model, 2022, Journal of Business Research

Hui Liao frequently collaborates with a group of coauthors, including:

  • Chaoyang Yan
  • Ying Ma
  • Yunyi Wu
  • Sangsang Li
  • Dan Han

Their work is regularly published in various academic venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • Quality of Life Research
  • Personnel Psychology
  • Journal of Applied Psychology

In 2020, Hui Liao was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • A MULTILEVEL INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING EMPLOYEE SERVICE PERFORMANCE AND CUSTOMER OUTCOMES

    Hui Liao;Aichia Chuang

  • A Conceptual Review of Human Resource Management Systems in Strategic Human Resource Management Research

    David P. Lepak;Hui Liao;Yunhyung Chung;Erika E. Harden

  • Do They See Eye to Eye? Management and Employee Perspectives of High-Performance Work Systems and Influence Processes on Service Quality

    Hui Liao;Keiko Toya;David P. Lepak;Ying Hong

  • The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-Level Investigation of the Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity

    Dong Liu;Hui Liao;Raymond Loi

  • Looking at Both Sides of the Social Exchange Coin: A Social Cognitive Perspective on the Joint Effects of Relationship Quality and Differentiation on Creativity

    Hui Liao;Dong Liu;Raymond Loi

  • Transforming service employees and climate: a multilevel, multisource examination of transformational leadership in building long-term service relationships.

    Hui Liao;Aichia Chuang

  • STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN SERVICE CONTEXT: TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS BY TAKING CARE OF EMPLOYEES AND CUSTOMERS

    Chih-Hsun Chuang;Hui Liao

  • The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework.

    Hui Liao;Deborah E Rupp

  • Do it right this time: the role of employee service recovery performance in customer-perceived justice and customer loyalty after service failures.

    Hui Liao

  • Daily customer mistreatment and employee sabotage against customers: Examining emotion and resource perspectives.

    Mo Wang;Hui Liao;Yujie Zhan;Junqi Shi

  • Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects

    Theresa M. Glomb;Hui Liao

  • Directive versus Empowering Leadership: A Field Experiment Comparing Impacts on Task Proficiency and Proactivity

    Scott L. Martin;Hui Liao;Elizabeth M. Campbell

  • Sticking out like a sore thumb: Employee dissimilarity and deviance at work

    Hui Liao;Aparna Joshi;Aichia Chuang

  • Missing link in the service profit chain: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of service climate.

    Ying Hong;Hui Liao;Jia Hu;Kaifeng Jiang

  • Getting Everyone on Board: The Role of Inspirational Leadership in Geographically Dispersed Teams

    Aparna Joshi;Mila B. Lazarova;Hui Liao

  • Can't get it out of my mind: employee rumination after customer mistreatment and negative mood in the next morning

    Mo Wang;Songqi Liu;Hui Liao;Yaping Gong

  • Doing the right thing without being told: joint effects of initiative climate and general self-efficacy on employee proactive customer service performance.

    Steffen Raub;Hui Liao

  • Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay

    Aparna Joshi;Hui Liao;Susan E. Jackson

  • Bridging Domains in Workplace Demography Research: A Review and Reconceptualization

    Aparna Anand Joshi;Hui Liao;Hyuntak Roh

  • The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange

    Deborah E. Rupp;Ruodan Shao;Kisha S. Jones;Hui Liao

Frequent Co-Authors

Aparna Joshi
Aparna Joshi Pennsylvania State University
Junqi Shi
Junqi Shi Zhejiang University
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
John D. Kammeyer-Mueller
John D. Kammeyer-Mueller University of Minnesota
Deborah E. Rupp
Deborah E. Rupp George Mason University
Raymond Loi
Raymond Loi University of Macau
Susan E. Jackson
Susan E. Jackson Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Debra L. Shapiro
Debra L. Shapiro University of Maryland, College Park
Theresa M. Glomb
Theresa M. Glomb University of Minnesota
David P. Lepak
David P. Lepak University of Massachusetts Amherst

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology can open doors to various fulfilling careers, including licensed professional counseling. Online psychology and counseling programs are increasingly popular for their flexibility and can help you meet education and licensing requirements from anywhere in the USA.

However, requirements for becoming a licensed therapist differ by state and city. For instance, if you're interested in pursuing a career in Alaska, take a look at the Anchorage licensed therapist education requirements. Similarly, those considering opportunities in Texas should review the Arlington licensed therapist education requirements.

In Georgia, you can find important steps in the how to become a licensed therapist in Atlanta guide, while Colorado’s process is detailed in the Aurora licensed therapist education requirements.

As you explore these pathways, research your state’s licensing laws and look for accredited online degrees that match your career goals. This will ensure you meet all professional standards necessary for practice.

Best Scientists Citing Hui Liao

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles