World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7114 6631 3847 3495 78 12603

Marshall Schminke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marshall Schminke between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marshall Schminke published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2014. 4 of the 106 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2014. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1970 2025

106 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marshall Schminke: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 2
1999 5
2000 3
2001 3
2002 5
2003 4
2004 3
2005 1
2006 0
2007 5
2008 1
2009 5
2010 6
2011 6
2012 5
2013 6
2014 10
2015 4
2016 1
2017 2
2018 2
2019 4
2020 4
2021 0
2022 2
2023 2
2024 3
2025 1
Total 106
Download as CSV

Marshall Schminke publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marshall Schminke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 78 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 78
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marshall Schminke D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marshall Schminke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marshall Schminke is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains with notable emphasis on ethics, organizational behavior, workplace dynamics, and health practices.

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • "Feeling Guilty and Entitled: Paradoxical Consequences of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior," 2022, Journal of Business Ethics
  • "A Light at the End of the Tunnel: How the Right Workplace Structure Can Help Disrupt the Negative Impact of Abusive Supervision," 2022, Human Performance
  • "Toxic work climates: An integrative review and development of a new construct and theoretical framework," 2024, Journal of Applied Psychology
  • "Do these jeans make me feel fat? Exploring subjective fatness, its workplace outcomes, and rethinking the role of subjectivity in the stigmatization process," 2023, Personnel Psychology
  • "Proximally Fat? Extending Stigma by Association to Explore Why an Employee May be Impacted by Another Employee's Obesity," 2024, Group & Organization Management

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Schminke include:

  • Manuela Priesemuth
  • Elizabeth E. Umphress
  • Marie S. Mitchell
  • Michael A. Johnson
  • Philip Q. Yang

Marshall Schminke has published in the following venues with notable frequency:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (4 publications)
  • Journal of Business Ethics
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Human Performance
  • Personnel Psychology

The main subfields of study reflected in their work include:

  • Information Systems and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Pharmacy
  • General Health Professions

The central research topics Schminke explores are:

  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Best Publications

  • The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation.

    Maureen L. Ambrose;Marshall Schminke

  • Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice

    Maureen L Ambrose;Mark A Seabright;Marshall Schminke

  • Assembling Fragments Into a Lens: A Review, Critique, and Proposed Research Agenda for the Organizational Work Climate Literature

    Maribeth Kuenzi;Marshall Schminke

  • Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust

    Maureen L. Ambrose;Marshall Schminke

  • Understanding groups in organizations.

    Paul S. Goodman;Elizabeth C. Ravlin;Marshall Schminke

  • Three roads to organizational justice

    Russell Cropanzano;Deborah E. Rupp;Carolyn J. Mohler;Marshall Schminke

  • The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes

    Marshall Schminke;Maureen L. Ambrose;Donald O. Neubaum

  • The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness.

    Marshall Schminke;Maureen L. Ambrose;Russell S. Cropanzano

  • Individual Moral Development and Ethical Climate: The Influence of Person–Organization Fit on Job Attitudes

    Maureen L. Ambrose;Anke Arnaud;Marshall Schminke

  • Organization structure and fairness perceptions: The moderating effects of organizational level

    Marshall Schminke;Russell Cropanzano;Deborah E Rupp

  • The Effect of Ethical Frameworks on Perceptions of Organizational Justice

    Marshall Schminke;Maureen L. Ambrose;Terry W. Noel

  • Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: a moderated mediation approach.

    Maureen L. Ambrose;Marshall Schminke;David M. Mayer

  • Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village

    David M. Mayer;Samir Nurmohamed;Linda Klebe Treviño;Debra L. Shapiro

  • Abusive supervision climate: : A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes

    Manuela Priesemuth;Marshall Schminke;Maureen L. Ambrose;Robert Folger

  • The Ethical Climate and Context of Organizations: A Comprehensive Model

    Anke Arnaud;Marshall Schminke

  • Firm Newness, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Ethical Climate

    Donald O. Neubaum;Marie S. Mitchell;Marshall Schminke

  • The Power of Ethical Work Climates

    Marshall Schminke;Anke Arnaud;Maribeth Kuenzi

  • Using Social Justice to Build Effective Work Groups

    Russell Cropanzano;Marshall Schminke

  • Sex differences in business ethics: The importance of perceptions.

    Maureen L. Ambrose;Marshall Schminke

  • Managerial Ethics: Moral Management of People and Processes

    Marshall Schminke

  • RESEARCH REPORTS The Role of Overall Justice Judgments in Organizational Justice Research: A Test of Mediation

    Maureen L. Ambrose;Marshall Schminke

Frequent Co-Authors

Maureen L. Ambrose
Maureen L. Ambrose University of Central Florida
David M. Mayer
David M. Mayer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Russell Cropanzano
Russell Cropanzano University of Colorado Boulder
David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
Donald O. Neubaum
Donald O. Neubaum Florida Atlantic University
Robert Folger
Robert Folger University of Central Florida
Deborah E. Rupp
Deborah E. Rupp George Mason University
Linda Klebe Treviño
Linda Klebe Treviño Pennsylvania State University
Debra L. Shapiro
Debra L. Shapiro University of Maryland, College Park
Karl Aquino
Karl Aquino University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and evolving career pathways, especially in specialized counseling fields. One prominent option is pursuing a career as a substance abuse counselor. Certification requirements can differ significantly by location, so it's crucial to research local criteria. For instance, Mesa substance abuse counselor certification requirements focus on specific education and supervised clinical experience.

If you are considering work in Florida, learning about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Miami will help you understand local licensure pathways and fieldwork expectations. Requirements may differ in the Midwest. Those interested in Wisconsin should review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Milwaukee to determine the necessary academic credentials and hands-on training.

In Minnesota, understanding Minneapolis substance abuse counselors education requirements is important before applying for licensure. Online psychology degrees often offer flexible coursework that supports these career goals, while also providing fundamental skills for advancement in mental health services, counseling, and social work across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Marshall Schminke

Trending Scientists