World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7693 7177 111 105 164 16298

Florence Stinglhamber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Florence Stinglhamber between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Florence Stinglhamber published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2011. 13 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2011. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 3 publications
1999 2025

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Florence Stinglhamber: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 7
2003 6
2004 3
2005 4
2006 2
2007 5
2008 3
2009 1
2010 5
2011 19
2012 5
2013 18
2014 13
2015 7
2016 9
2017 6
2018 5
2019 16
2020 11
2021 16
2022 13
2023 5
2024 10
2025 3
Total 196
Download as CSV

Florence Stinglhamber publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florence Stinglhamber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 164 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 164
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Florence Stinglhamber D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florence Stinglhamber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Florence Stinglhamber is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the fields of business, management and accounting, psychology, and social sciences. They have contributed extensively to subfields such as organizational behavior and human resource management, social psychology, sociology and political science, general health professions, and clinical psychology.

Their work covers key topics including job satisfaction and organizational behavior, workaholism, burnout and well-being, cultural differences and values, workplace health and well-being, behavioral health and interventions, emotional labor in professions, and work-family balance challenges.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Stinglhamber include:

  • The relationship between presenteeism and job satisfaction: A mediated moderation model using work engagement and perceived organizational support (2020, European Management Journal)
  • Is Parental Burnout Distinct From Job Burnout and Depressive Symptoms? (2020, Clinical Psychological Science)
  • Examining the role of fundamental psychological needs in the development of metadehumanization: A multi-population approach (2020, British Journal of Social Psychology)
  • Are all Burned Out Parents Neglectful and Violent? A Latent Profile Analysis (2020, Journal of Child and Family Studies)
  • Leader-member exchange and organizational dehumanization: The role of supervisor's organizational embodiment (2021, European Management Journal)

Stinglhamber frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Stéphanie Demoulin
  • Gaëtane Caesens
  • Pierre Maurage
  • Nathan Nguyen
  • Constantin Lagios

Their research is often published in journals such as:

  • European Management Journal
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • Current Psychology

Best Publications

  • Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention.

    Robert Eisenberger;Florence Stinglhamber;Christian Vandenberghe;Ivan L. Sucharski

  • Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: a longitudinal study

    Florence Stinglhamber;Christian Vandenberghe

  • Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees.

    Robert Eisenberger;Florence Stinglhamber

  • Leader-member exchange and affective organizational commitment: The contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment

    Robert Eisenberger;Gokhan Karagonlar;Florence Stinglhamber;Pedro Neves

  • Affective commitment to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes

    Christian Vandenberghe;Kathleen Bentein;Florence Stinglhamber

  • The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach

    Kathleen Bentein;Christian Vandenberghe;Robert Vandenberg;Florence Stinglhamber

  • Perceived Organizational Support

    Florence Stinglhamber;Gaëtane Caesens;Laura Clark;Robert Eisenberger

  • Flow experiences at work: for high need achievers alone?

    Robert Eisenberger;Jason R. Jones;Florence Stinglhamber;Linda Shanock

  • Understanding employees' responses to corporate social responsibility: Mediating roles of overall justice and organisational identification.

    Kenneth De Roeck;Géraldine Marique;Florence Stinglhamber;Valérie Swaen

  • Extension of the three-component model of commitment to five foci - Development of measures and substantive test

    Florence Stinglhamber;Kathleen Bentein;Christian Vandenberghe

  • The relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement: The role of self-efficacy and its outcomes

    Gaëtane Caesens;Gaëtane Caesens;Florence Stinglhamber

  • Perceived support as a mediator of the relationship between justice and trust: A multiple foci approach

    Florence Stinglhamber;David De Cremer;Liesbeth Mercken

  • The impact of work engagement and workaholism on well-being: The role of work-related social support.

    Gaëtane Caesens;Florence Stinglhamber;Gaylord Luypaert

  • Perceived organizational support and employees’ well-being: the mediating role of organizational dehumanization

    Gaëtane Caesens;Florence Stinglhamber;Stéphanie Demoulin;Matthias De Wilde

  • The relationship between perceived organizational support and affective commitment: A social identity perspective

    Géraldine Marique;Florence Stinglhamber;Donatienne Desmette;Gaëtane Caesens

  • Rewarding leadership and fair procedures as determinants of self-esteem

    David De Cremer;Barbara van Knippenberg;Daan van Knippenberg;Danny Mullenders

  • Ageism at work: The impact of intergenerational contact and organizational multi- age perspective

    Caroline Iweins;Donatienne Desmette;Vincent Yzerbyt;Florence Stinglhamber

  • Organization-, supervisor-, and workgroup-directed commitments and citizenship behaviours: A comparison of models

    Kathleen Bentein;Florence Stinglhamber;Christian Vandenberghe

  • Extension of the Three-Component Model of Commitment to Five Foci1

    Florence Stinglhamber;Kathleen Bentein;Christian Vandenberghe

  • An Examination of the Cross-Cultural Validity of a Multidimensional Model of Commitment in Europe

    Christian Vandenberghe;Florence Stinglhamber;Kathleen Bentein;Tania Delhaise

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Eisenberger
Robert Eisenberger University of Houston
Pierre Maurage
Pierre Maurage Université Catholique de Louvain
Philippe de Timary
Philippe de Timary Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Alexandre J. S. Morin
Alexandre J. S. Morin Concordia University
David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
Moïra Mikolajczak
Moïra Mikolajczak Université Catholique de Louvain
Isabelle Roskam
Isabelle Roskam Université Catholique de Louvain
Thomas Becker
Thomas Becker University of South Florida
Vincent Yzerbyt
Vincent Yzerbyt Université Catholique de Louvain

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to a range of rewarding career options. Many students choose to advance into specialized fields like Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), where becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a popular path. To get started, it's important to understand local requirements—such as those specific for how to become a bcba in Tampa or for becoming a bcba in Toledo.

Online degree programs make it more convenient than ever to earn the necessary credentials. Students can access coursework remotely, making it easier to balance work and study. Certification details may vary based on location, so researching bcba certification requirements in Tucson or how to become a bcba in Tulsa can help clarify regional expectations.

Whether you plan to work directly with clients or pursue academic research, these online pathways support flexible learning and set a strong foundation for roles in clinical, educational, or community-based settings.

Best Scientists Citing Florence Stinglhamber

Trending Scientists