World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4681
World Ranking
9917
National Ranking
11

Anna Grabowska publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Grabowska sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anna Grabowska D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Grabowska sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna Grabowska is affiliated with the University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Poland. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Neuroscience, Psychology, and Social Sciences, with significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Education as subfields.

The main topics covered in their work include Reading and Literacy Development, Writing and Handwriting Education, Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills, Child Development and Digital Technology, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Anna Grabowska are:

  • Katarzyna Jednoróg
  • Agnieszka Dębska
  • Katarzyna Chyl
  • Gabriela Dzięgiel-Fivet
  • Magdalena Łuniewska

Their recent publications include:

  • Machine learning reveals differential effects of depression and anxiety on reward and punishment processing, 2024, Scientific Reports
  • Stefan Szuman we wspomnieniach rodzinnych: życie pełne pasji, poszukiwania prawdy i obcowania z pięknem, 2023, Psychologia Rozwojowa
  • Distinct medial-temporal lobe mechanisms of encoding and amygdala-mediated memory reinstatement for disgust and fear, 2022, NeuroImage
  • Neural patterns of word processing differ in children with dyslexia and isolated spelling deficit, 2021, Brain Structure and Function
  • The cognitive basis of dyslexia in school-aged children: A multiple case study in a transparent orthography, 2021, Developmental Science

Anna Grabowska has contributed to journals such as Brain Structure and Function, Developmental Science, Scientific Reports, NeuroImage, and Psychologia Rozwojowa. These venues reflect a cross-disciplinary approach involving cognitive neuroscience and psychological development.

Best Publications

  • The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database.

    Artur Marchewka;Łukasz Żurawski;Katarzyna Jednoróg;Anna Grabowska

  • Sex differences in perception of emotion intensity in dynamic and static facial expressions.

    Cezary Biele;Anna Grabowska

  • Cognitive subtypes of dyslexia.

    Stefan Heim;Julia Tschierse;Katrin Amunts;Marcus Wilms

  • Response inhibition of children with ADHD in the stop-signal task: an event-related potential study.

    Magdalena Senderecka;Anna Grabowska;Jakub Szewczyk;Krzysztof Gerc

  • EMG activity in response to static and dynamic facial expressions

    Krystyna Rymarczyk;Cezary Biele;Anna Grabowska;Henryk Majczynski

  • Sex on the brain: Are gender-dependent structural and functional differences associated with behavior?

    Anna Grabowska

  • Molecular characteristics of KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae at the early stage of their dissemination in Poland, 2008-2009

    Anna Baraniak;Anna Grabowska;Radosław Izdebski;Janusz Fiett

  • Characterization of the Nencki Affective Picture System by discrete emotional categories (NAPS BE)

    Monika Riegel;Łukasz Żurawski;Małgorzata Wierzba;Abnoss Moslehi;Abnoss Moslehi

  • Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL): the cultural adaptation of the Berlin Affective Word List-Reloaded (BAWL-R) for Polish.

    Monika Riegel;Małgorzata Wierzba;Marek Wypych;Łukasz Żurawski

  • Interhemispheric transmission of information and functional asymmetry of the human brain.

    A Nowicka;A Grabowska;E Fersten

  • Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from food and food processing environment in Poland.

    Dorota Korsak;Anna Borek;Sylwia Daniluk;Anna Grabowska

  • Attentional deficit in dyslexia: a general or specific impairment?

    Dorota B. Bednarek;David Saldana;Eliana Quintero-Gallego;Isabel Garcia

  • Cognitive subtypes of dyslexia are characterized by distinct patterns of grey matter volume

    Katarzyna Jednoróg;Natalia Gawron;Artur Marchewka;Stefan Heim

  • Masculinity, femininity, and transsexualism.

    Anna Herman-Jeglińska;Anna Grabowska;Stanisław Dulko

  • Switching handedness: fMRI study of hand motor control in right-handers, left-handers and converted left-handers.

    Anna Grabowska;Malgorzata Gut;Marek Binder;Lars Forsberg

  • VISUAL-SPATIAL-FREQUENCY MODEL OF CEREBRAL ASYMMETRY : A CRITICAL SURVEY OF BEHAVIORAL AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES

    Anna Grabowska;Anna Nowicka

  • Brain correlates of right-handedness.

    Malgorzata Gut;Andrzej Urbanik;Lars Forsberg;Marek Binder

  • How reliable are gray matter disruptions in specific reading disability across multiple countries and languages? insights from a large-scale voxel-based morphometry study

    Katarzyna Jednoróg;Artur Marchewka;Irene Altarelli;Irene Altarelli;Ana Karla Monzalvo Lopez;Ana Karla Monzalvo Lopez

  • Interaction of phonological awareness and 'magnocellular' processing during normal and dyslexic reading: behavioural and fMRI investigations.

    Stefan Heim;Marion Grande;Julia Pape-Neumann;Muna van Ermingen

  • Phonological and semantic fluencies are mediated by different regions of the prefrontal cortex

    Iwona Szatkowska;Anna Grabowska;Olga Szymañska

Frequent Co-Authors

Artur Marchewka
Artur Marchewka Polish Academy of Sciences
Katrin Amunts
Katrin Amunts Forschungszentrum Jülich
Patrik Vuilleumier
Patrik Vuilleumier University of Geneva
Leszek Kaczmarek
Leszek Kaczmarek Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego
Bogdan Draganski
Bogdan Draganski University Hospital of Bern
Henning Scheich
Henning Scheich Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Olivier Neyrolles
Olivier Neyrolles Paul Sabatier University
Marek Gniadkowski
Marek Gniadkowski Medical University of Warsaw
Walter Huber
Walter Huber RWTH Aachen University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens the door to diverse and rewarding career opportunities. Many students choose to specialize through related online degrees, such as counseling or marriage and family therapy (MFT). These programs offer flexibility and can often be tailored to fit your career goals and state-specific requirements.

For instance, if you are interested in helping couples and families, you may want to learn more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Phoenix or explore different MFT pathways, like how to become an mft in Pittsburgh. Requirements can vary depending on local licensure rules, so it's essential to research the specific criteria in your desired location.

For those living in Texas, you might be curious about how to become an mft in Plano. Alternatively, Florida residents can find guidance on mft requirements in Port St. Lucie. By understanding these requirements and available programs, you'll be better prepared to choose the right educational and professional pathway for your future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Anna Grabowska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles