World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
6631
World Ranking
6770
National Ranking
681

Markus Hausmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Hausmann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 129 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Markus Hausmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Hausmann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Hausmann is affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans across neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. The main fields of study contributed to by Hausmann include Neuroscience with 31 publications and Psychology with 14 publications.

Their subfields of study reflect this interdisciplinary approach, comprising:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Hausmann's work addresses various topics within neuroscience and psychology. Prominent themes in their research include:

  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Sex and Gender in Healthcare

The scientist has published in several venues, with frequent contributions to these journals:

  • Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Neuropsychology
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Psychological Research

Recent papers co-authored by Hausmann include:

  • "Sex/Gender Differences in Verbal Fluency and Verbal-Episodic Memory: A Meta-Analysis" (2022) published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Gender stereotypes and incremental beliefs in STEM and non-STEM students in three countries: relationships with performance in cognitive tasks" (2020) published in Psychological Research
  • "Laterality indices consensus initiative (LICI): A Delphi expert survey report on recommendations to record, assess, and report asymmetry in human behavioural and brain research" (2023) published in Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition
  • "Recommendations for a Better Understanding of Sex and Gender in the Neuroscience of Mental Health" (2023) published in Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
  • "Sex/gender differences in the brain are not trivial-A commentary on Eliot et al. (2021)" (2021) published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

The scientist frequently collaborates with others in their field. These co-authors include:

  • Marco Hirnstein
  • Sophie Hodgetts
  • René Westerhausen
  • Angelica Moè
  • Gina M. Grimshaw

Best Publications

  • Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle.

    Markus Hausmann;Ditte Slabbekoorn;Stephanie H. M. Van Goozen;Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis

  • Sex Differences and the Impact of Steroid Hormones on the Developing Human Brain

    Susanne Neufang;Karsten Specht;Markus Hausmann;Onur Güntürkün

  • Steroid fluctuations modify functional cerebral asymmetries: the hypothesis of progesterone-mediated interhemispheric decoupling

    Markus Hausmann;Onur Güntürkün

  • Interactive effects of sex hormones and gender stereotypes on cognitive sex differences-A psychobiosocial approach

    Markus Hausmann;Daniela Schoofs;Harriet E.S. Rosenthal;Kirsten Jordan

  • Cognitive sex differences and hemispheric asymmetry: A critical review of 40 years of research.

    Marco Hirnstein;Kenneth Hugdahl;Markus Hausmann

  • Functional cerebral asymmetries during the menstrual cycle: a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis.

    Markus Hausmann;Claudia Becker;Ursula Gather;Onur Güntürkün

  • Estradiol Modulates Functional Brain Organization during the Menstrual Cycle: An Analysis of Interhemispheric Inhibition

    Susanne Weis;Markus Hausmann;Barbara Stoffers;René Vohn

  • Migraine and cognitive function: a life-course study.

    Karen E. Waldie;Markus Hausmann;Barry J. Milne;Richie Poulton

  • Resting states are resting traits--an FMRI study of sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in resting state cognitive control networks.

    Helene Hjelmervik;Markus Hausmann;Berge Osnes;René Westerhausen

  • Sex differences in line bisection as a function of hand

    Markus Hausmann;Gökce Ergun;Yanki Yazgan;Onur Güntürkün

  • Hemispheric asymmetry in spatial attention across the menstrual cycle.

    Markus Hausmann

  • Developmental changes in line bisection: a result of callosal maturation?

    Markus Hausmann;Karen E. Waldie;Michael C. Corballis

  • Why sex hormones matter for neuroscience: A very short review on sex, sex hormones, and functional brain asymmetries.

    Markus Hausmann

  • Sex/Gender Differences in Verbal Fluency and Verbal-Episodic Memory: A Meta-Analysis

    Unknown

  • Lateralized cognition: asymmetrical and complementary strategies of pigeons during discrimination of the "human concept".

    Y. Yamazaki;U. Aust;L. Huber;M. Hausmann

  • Transcallosal inhibition across the menstrual cycle: a TMS study.

    Markus Hausmann;Martin Tegenthoff;Jessica Sänger;Frank Janssen

  • The Neural Correlates of Emotional Prosody Comprehension: Disentangling Simple from Complex Emotion

    Lucy Alba-Ferrara;Lucy Alba-Ferrara;Markus Hausmann;Rachel L. Mitchell;Susanne Weis

  • Sex differences in cortical and subcortical recruitment during simple and complex motor control: an fMRI study.

    Silke Lissek;Markus Hausmann;Frauke Knossalla;Sören Peters

  • Influence of task complexity on manual asymmetries

    Markus Hausmann;Ian J. Kirk;Michael C. Corballis

  • Gender-Stereotyping and Cognitive Sex Differences in Mixed- and Same-Sex Groups

    Marco Hirnstein;Lisa Coloma Andrews;Markus Hausmann

  • Sex and Gender Differences

    Markus Hausmann;Barbara Schober

Frequent Co-Authors

Onur Güntürkün
Onur Güntürkün Ruhr University Bochum
Jörg Lewald
Jörg Lewald Ruhr University Bochum
Karsten Specht
Karsten Specht University of Bergen
Michael C. Corballis
Michael C. Corballis University of Auckland
Martin Tegenthoff
Martin Tegenthoff Ruhr University Bochum
Karen E. Waldie
Karen E. Waldie University of Auckland
Susanne Weis
Susanne Weis Forschungszentrum Jülich
Kenneth Hugdahl
Kenneth Hugdahl University of Bergen
Bettina Pfleiderer
Bettina Pfleiderer University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens up diverse online pathways, including careers in clinical practice, counseling, education, and social work. Social work, in particular, is a growing field with flexible online degree options and a strong demand for professionals across the United States.

Each state sets its own social work licensing standards. If you wish to practice in the Midwest, the Kansas social work license requirements outline educational and supervised experience criteria. Similarly, the requirements to be a social worker in Kentucky emphasize both academic preparation and fieldwork hours.

For those in the South, becoming a social worker in Louisiana requires a state-specific process, including accredited degrees and examination steps. If you are aiming for New England, requirements to be a social worker in Maine are also unique, with different licensing levels and continuing education expectations.

Before enrolling in an online psychology or social work program, be sure to research the local requirements for licensure. This helps ensure your degree will lead to the career pathway you want, wherever you plan to live or work.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Hausmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles