World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8628 8062 403 396 110 5639

Martin Heil publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Heil between 1991 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Heil published across 34 years, from 1991 to 2024, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2010. 4 of the 120 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2010. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications
1991 2024

120 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Heil: publications per year, 1991 to 2024
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 0
1993 4
1994 2
1995 4
1996 2
1997 4
1998 3
1999 4
2000 2
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 3
2005 1
2006 5
2007 11
2008 10
2009 6
2010 12
2011 5
2012 5
2013 3
2014 3
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 5
2019 4
2020 5
2021 3
2022 1
2023 1
2024 3
Total 120
Download as CSV

Martin Heil publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Heil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 110
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Heil D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Heil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Heil is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a pronounced focus on several subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Urology, and Surgery.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, notably Sexual Differentiation and Disorders, Urological Disorders and Treatments, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities, Anesthesia and Pain Management, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, and Congenital limb and hand anomalies.

Recent publications by Martin Heil include:

  • Perioperative anxiety and length of hospital stay after caesarean section - A cohort study, 2020, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • Investigating the reliability and sex differences of digit lengths, ratios, and hand measures in infants, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Parent-Reports of Sex-Typed Play Preference in Preschool Children: Relationships to 2D:4D Digit Ratio and Older Siblings' Sex, 2020, Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Health-related quality of life after heart surgery - Identification of high-risk patients: A cohort study, 2020, International Journal of Surgery
  • The association of prenatal amniotic sex hormones and digit ratio (2D:4D) in children aged 5 to 70 months: A longitudinal study, 2023, PLoS ONE

Martin Heil works frequently with several coauthors, including Nora K. Schaal, Lisa M. Körner, Luisa Ernsten, Gareth Richards, and Oliver T. Wolf.

The scientist's articles have appeared in specific venues multiple times, especially in Scientific Reports, as well as in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Archives of Sexual Behavior, PLoS ONE, and International Journal of Surgery.

Best Publications

  • Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect.

    Bettina Rolke;Martin Heil;Judith Streb;Erwin Hennighausen

  • Slow negative brain potentials as reflections of specific modular resources of cognition

    Frank Rösler;Martin Heil;Brigitte Röder

  • Expertise in dance modulates alpha/beta event-related desynchronization during action observation

    Guido Orgs;Jan-Henryk Dombrowski;Martin Heil;Petra Jansen-Osmann

  • N200 in the Eriksen-Task: Inhibitory Executive Processes?

    Martin Heil;Allen Osman;Juliane Wiegelmann;Bettina Rolke

  • The functional significance of ERP effects during mental rotation

    Martin Heil

  • Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation.

    Petra Jansen-Osmann;Martin Heil

  • Sex Differences in Mental Rotation with Polygons of Different Complexity: Do Men Utilize Holistic Processes whereas Women Prefer Piecemeal Ones?:

    Martin Heil;Petra Jansen-Osmann

  • A correction method for DC drift artifacts

    Erwin Hennighausen;Martin Heil;Frank Rösler

  • Distinct cortical activation patterns during long-term memory retrieval of verbal, spatial, and color information

    Frank Rösler;Martin Heil;Erwin Hennighausen

  • Toward a chronopsychophysiology of mental rotation.

    Martin Heil;Bettina Rolke

  • Gender differences in pre-adolescents’ mental-rotation performance: Do they depend on grade and stimulus type?

    Sarah Neuburger;Petra Jansen;Martin Heil;Claudia Quaiser-Pohl

  • Automatic Semantic Activation Is No Myth Semantic Context Effects on the N400 in the Letter-Search Task in the Absence of Response Time Effects

    Martin Heil;Bettina Rolke;Anna Pecchinenda

  • What is improved if a mental rotation task is repeated--the efficiency of memory access, or the speed of a transformation routine?

    Martin Heil;Frank Rösler;Michael Link;Jasmin Bajric

  • Topographic differences of slow event-related brain potentials in blind and sighted adult human subjects during haptic mental rotation

    Frank Ro¨sler;Brigitte Ro¨der;Martin Heil;Erwin Hennighausen

  • Toward a Functional Categorization of Slow Waves: Taking into Account Past and Future Events

    Frank Rösler;Martin Heil

  • Mental rotation in female fraternal twins: Evidence for intra-uterine hormone transfer?

    Martin Heil;Michael Kavšek;Bettina Rolke;Christian Beste

  • Monitoring retrieval from long-term memory by slow event-related brain potentials

    Frank Rösler;Martin Heil;Ulrich Glowalla

  • Mental rotation performance and the effect of gender in fourth graders and adults

    Corinna Titze;Petra Jansen;Martin Heil

  • Spatial knowledge acquisition in younger and elderly adults: a study in a virtual environment.

    Petra Jansen;Andrea Schmelter;Martin Heil

  • Conceptual priming for environmental sounds and words: an ERP study.

    Guido Orgs;Kathrin Lange;Jan-Henryk Dombrowski;Martin Heil

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Rösler
Frank Rösler Universität Hamburg
Petra Jansen
Petra Jansen University of Regensburg
Tanja Fehm
Tanja Fehm Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Gunther Meinlschmidt
Gunther Meinlschmidt University Hospital of Basel
Oliver T. Wolf
Oliver T. Wolf Ruhr University Bochum
Katharina Domschke
Katharina Domschke University of Freiburg
Bettina M. Pause
Bettina M. Pause Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Scott P. Johnson
Scott P. Johnson University of California, Los Angeles
Bernhard T. Baune
Bernhard T. Baune University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree can open diverse career pathways across counseling, research, education, and health sectors. With the growth of online learning, students now have access to a range of flexible psychology programs, meeting the needs of traditional and non-traditional learners alike.

When comparing options, location can matter, especially if you’re considering hybrid programs or local internship opportunities. For those near New Jersey, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Newark can help narrow down schools with strong local reputations. Similarly, the best psychology degree programs ranking in New Hampshire guides students interested in the Northeast.

Out west, the top psychology programs in Orange are worth exploring for those eyeing California’s vibrant job market. In Florida, the top psychology degrees in Orlando provide access to both metropolitan and clinical opportunities.

Whether you pursue an online or campus-based path, these rankings can assist in making an informed decision and preparing for careers in mental health, organizational psychology, or further graduate studies.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Heil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles